Department of Periodontology, School of Dentistry, Ege University, Izmir, Turkey.
J Clin Periodontol. 2011 Mar;38 Suppl 11:85-105. doi: 10.1111/j.1600-051X.2010.01670.x.
A major challenge in clinical periodontics is to find a reliable molecular marker of periodontal tissue destruction with high sensitivity, specificity and utility.
The aim of this systematic review is to evaluate available literature on 'the utility of molecular markers of soft and hard periodontal tissue destruction'.
Based on the focused question, 'What is the utility of molecular markers of soft and hard periodontal tissue destruction', an electronic and manual search was conducted for human studies presenting clinical data for the potential of molecular markers of tissue destruction in biofluids; gingival crevicular fluid (GCF), saliva, and serum.
Papers fulfilling the inclusion criteria were selected. All relevant data from the selected papers were extracted and recorded in separate tables for molecules in GCF, saliva, and serum.
Within the defined limits of the Problem/Population, Intervention, Comparison, Outcome, the present analysis reveals that (a) no single or combination of markers exists that can disclose periodontal tissue destruction adequately; (b) while the most fruitful source of biomarkers for periodontal destruction appears to be in molecules tightly related to bone and soft tissue destruction, this remains to be objectively demonstrated. Currently, clinical measurements are still the most reliable.
临床牙周病学的一个主要挑战是找到一种具有高灵敏度、特异性和实用性的可靠的牙周组织破坏的分子标志物。
本系统评价的目的是评估有关“软、硬组织牙周破坏的分子标志物的实用性”的现有文献。
根据重点问题“软、硬组织牙周破坏的分子标志物的实用性如何”,对在生物流体(龈沟液[GCF]、唾液和血清)中呈现组织破坏的分子标志物的临床数据的人类研究进行了电子和手动检索。
选择符合纳入标准的论文。从选定的论文中提取所有相关数据,并分别记录在 GCF、唾液和血清中分子的单独表格中。
在限定的问题/人群、干预、比较、结果范围内,本分析表明:(a)不存在能够充分揭示牙周组织破坏的单一或组合标志物;(b)虽然与骨和软组织破坏密切相关的分子似乎是牙周破坏生物标志物最有希望的来源,但这仍需客观证明。目前,临床测量仍然是最可靠的。