Buckler Biomedical, 13 Larch Row, Wenham, MA 01984, USA.
Radiology. 2011 Jun;259(3):875-84. doi: 10.1148/radiol.10100800. Epub 2011 Feb 15.
Quantitative imaging biomarkers could speed the development of new treatments for unmet medical needs and improve routine clinical care. However, it is not clear how the various regulatory and nonregulatory (eg, reimbursement) processes (often referred to as pathways) relate, nor is it clear which data need to be collected to support these different pathways most efficiently, given the time- and cost-intensive nature of doing so. The purpose of this article is to describe current thinking regarding these pathways emerging from diverse stakeholders interested and active in the definition, validation, and qualification of quantitative imaging biomarkers and to propose processes to facilitate the development and use of quantitative imaging biomarkers. A flexible framework is described that may be adapted for each imaging application, providing mechanisms that can be used to develop, assess, and evaluate relevant biomarkers. From this framework, processes can be mapped that would be applicable to both imaging product development and to quantitative imaging biomarker development aimed at increasing the effectiveness and availability of quantitative imaging.
http://radiology.rsna.org/lookup/suppl/doi:10.1148/radiol.10100800/-/DC1.
定量成像生物标志物可以加快满足未满足的医疗需求的新疗法的开发,并改善常规临床护理。然而,目前尚不清楚各种监管和非监管(例如报销)流程(通常称为途径)之间的关系,也不清楚为了最有效地支持这些不同途径需要收集哪些数据,因为这样做的时间和成本都很高。本文的目的是描述来自对定量成像生物标志物的定义、验证和资格鉴定感兴趣并积极参与的不同利益相关者的当前思路,并提出促进定量成像生物标志物的开发和使用的流程。本文描述了一个灵活的框架,该框架可以针对每个成像应用进行调整,提供可以用于开发、评估和评估相关生物标志物的机制。在此框架中,可以映射出适用于成像产品开发以及旨在提高定量成像的有效性和可用性的定量成像生物标志物开发的流程。
http://radiology.rsna.org/lookup/suppl/doi:10.1148/radiol.10100800/-/DC1.