• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

头颈部癌症中改变分割放疗和化疗的混合治疗比较荟萃分析。

Mixed treatment comparison meta-analysis of altered fractionated radiotherapy and chemotherapy in head and neck cancer.

机构信息

Department of Biostatistics and Epidemiology, Institut Gustave Roussy, Villejuif, France.

出版信息

J Clin Epidemiol. 2011 Sep;64(9):985-92. doi: 10.1016/j.jclinepi.2010.10.016. Epub 2011 Feb 18.

DOI:10.1016/j.jclinepi.2010.10.016
PMID:21330105
Abstract

OBJECTIVE

Different treatments have been investigated in head and neck cancers (HNCs) but not all of them have been appraised using pairwise comparison. This has resulted in failure to directly identify the best treatment with standard methods. Mixed treatment comparison (MTC) meta-analysis allows one to perform simultaneous inference regarding all treatments and select the best among them.

STUDY DESIGN AND SETTING

We applied MTC models to the Meta-Analyses of Chemotherapy and Radiotherapy in HNC, which pooled individual patient data concerning more than 24,000 patients involved in 102 trials. Fixed- and random-effects models, models with or without consistency factors, possibly adapted to multiarm trials are discussed.

RESULTS

Altered fractionated concomitant chemoradiotherapy (AF-CRT) leads to the highest probability of survival in nonmetastatic HNC. The probability that AF-CRT is the best treatment is 94% with random-effects models. There was no relevant inconsistency. When only the most recent trials were selected, AF-CRT and concomitant chemoradiotherapy (CRT) were the two best treatments. AF-CRT remains better than CRT but with a lower posterior probability.

CONCLUSION

MTC is a powerful method for investigating networks of randomized trials. Homogeneity, similarity of trial designs, populations, and the consistency of the network should be thoroughly checked.

摘要

目的

在头颈部癌症(HNC)中已经研究了不同的治疗方法,但并非所有方法都使用配对比较进行评估。这导致无法使用标准方法直接确定最佳治疗方法。混合治疗比较(MTC)荟萃分析允许对所有治疗方法进行同时推断,并从中选择最佳方法。

研究设计和设置

我们将 MTC 模型应用于头颈部癌症的化疗和放疗荟萃分析,该分析汇总了涉及 102 项试验的超过 24000 名患者的个体患者数据。讨论了固定效应和随机效应模型、具有或不具有一致性因素的模型,以及可能适用于多臂试验的模型。

结果

改变分割同期放化疗(AF-CRT)可提高非转移性 HNC 的生存率。随机效应模型中,AF-CRT 是最佳治疗方法的概率为 94%。没有明显的不一致性。当仅选择最新的试验时,AF-CRT 和同期放化疗(CRT)是两种最佳治疗方法。AF-CRT 仍然优于 CRT,但后验概率较低。

结论

MTC 是研究随机试验网络的有力方法。应彻底检查同质性、试验设计、人群和网络的一致性。

相似文献

1
Mixed treatment comparison meta-analysis of altered fractionated radiotherapy and chemotherapy in head and neck cancer.头颈部癌症中改变分割放疗和化疗的混合治疗比较荟萃分析。
J Clin Epidemiol. 2011 Sep;64(9):985-92. doi: 10.1016/j.jclinepi.2010.10.016. Epub 2011 Feb 18.
2
A Network Meta-Analysis of the Systemic Therapies in Unresectable Head and Neck Squamous Cell Carcinoma.无法切除的头颈部鳞状细胞癌的系统治疗的网状荟萃分析。
Cancer Control. 2024 Jan-Dec;31:10732748241255535. doi: 10.1177/10732748241255535.
3
Role of radiotherapy fractionation in head and neck cancers (MARCH): an updated meta-analysis.头颈部癌放疗分割的作用(MARCH):一项更新的荟萃分析。
Lancet Oncol. 2017 Sep;18(9):1221-1237. doi: 10.1016/S1470-2045(17)30458-8. Epub 2017 Jul 27.
4
Systematic Review and Meta-analysis of Conventionally Fractionated Concurrent Chemoradiotherapy versus Altered Fractionation Radiotherapy Alone in the Definitive Management of Locoregionally Advanced Head and Neck Squamous Cell Carcinoma.常规分割同步放化疗与单纯超分割放疗在局部晚期头颈部鳞状细胞癌确定性治疗中的系统评价和荟萃分析
Clin Oncol (R Coll Radiol). 2016 Jan;28(1):50-61. doi: 10.1016/j.clon.2015.09.002. Epub 2015 Oct 9.
5
An intergroup phase III comparison of standard radiation therapy and two schedules of concurrent chemoradiotherapy in patients with unresectable squamous cell head and neck cancer.不可切除的头颈部鳞状细胞癌患者中标准放射治疗与两种同步放化疗方案的 III 期组间比较。
J Clin Oncol. 2003 Jan 1;21(1):92-8. doi: 10.1200/JCO.2003.01.008.
6
Locally advanced squamous cell carcinoma of the head and neck: A systematic review and Bayesian network meta-analysis of the currently available treatment options.局部晚期头颈部鳞状细胞癌:当前治疗方案的系统评价和贝叶斯网络荟萃分析。
Oral Oncol. 2018 May;80:40-51. doi: 10.1016/j.oraloncology.2018.03.001. Epub 2018 Mar 27.
7
[Taxan induction chemotherapy and concomitant chemoradiotherapy with cisplatin in patients with locally advanced head and neck cancer--early results].[多西他赛诱导化疗联合顺铂同步放化疗治疗局部晚期头颈癌患者的早期结果]
Pol Merkur Lekarski. 2010 Dec;29(174):357-60.
8
Systemic therapy in the curative treatment of head and neck squamous cell cancer: a systematic review.头颈部鳞状细胞癌根治性治疗中的全身治疗:一项系统评价
J Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 2017 Apr 4;46(1):29. doi: 10.1186/s40463-017-0199-x.
9
Chemotherapy and radiotherapy in locally advanced head and neck cancer: an individual patient data network meta-analysis.局部晚期头颈部癌症的化疗和放疗:一项个体患者数据网络荟萃分析。
Lancet Oncol. 2021 May;22(5):727-736. doi: 10.1016/S1470-2045(21)00076-0. Epub 2021 Apr 13.
10
Induction chemotherapy in head and neck cancer patients followed by concomitant docetaxel-based radiochemotherapy.头颈部癌症患者的诱导化疗后行多西紫杉醇为基础的放化疗。
Eur J Cancer Care (Engl). 2011 Jul;20(4):503-7. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2354.2010.01185.x. Epub 2010 Apr 30.

引用本文的文献

1
Response assessment of post-treatment head and neck cancers to determine further management using NI-RADS (Neck Imaging Reporting and Data System): a subgroup analysis of a randomized controlled trial.使用NI-RADS(颈部影像报告和数据系统)评估治疗后头颈癌的反应以确定进一步治疗方案:一项随机对照试验的亚组分析
Front Oncol. 2023 Sep 21;13:1200366. doi: 10.3389/fonc.2023.1200366. eCollection 2023.
2
Machine learning identifies multi-parametric functional PET/MR imaging cluster to predict radiation resistance in preclinical head and neck cancer models.机器学习识别多参数功能 PET/MR 成像簇,以预测头颈部癌症模型中的放射抵抗。
Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging. 2023 Aug;50(10):3084-3096. doi: 10.1007/s00259-023-06254-9. Epub 2023 May 6.
3
A frequentist one-step model for a simple network meta-analysis of time-to-event data in presence of an effect modifier.存在效应修饰时,简单网络荟萃分析中事件时间数据的频繁主义一步模型。
PLoS One. 2021 Nov 1;16(11):e0259121. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0259121. eCollection 2021.
4
The Most Efficacious Induction Chemotherapy Regimen for Locoregionally Advanced Nasopharyngeal Carcinoma: A Network Meta-Analysis.局部晚期鼻咽癌最有效的诱导化疗方案:一项网状Meta分析
Front Oncol. 2021 Feb 25;11:626145. doi: 10.3389/fonc.2021.626145. eCollection 2021.
5
Tobacco exposure as a major modifier of oncologic outcomes in human papillomavirus (HPV) associated oropharyngeal squamous cell carcinoma.烟草暴露作为人乳头瘤病毒(HPV)相关口咽鳞状细胞癌肿瘤学结果的主要修饰因子。
BMC Cancer. 2020 Sep 23;20(1):912. doi: 10.1186/s12885-020-07427-7.
6
Radiobiologically derived biphasic fractionation schemes to overcome the effects of tumour hypoxia.通过放射生物学得出的双相分割方案,以克服肿瘤缺氧的影响。
Br J Radiol. 2020 Aug;93(1112):20190250. doi: 10.1259/bjr.20190250. Epub 2020 Jun 2.
7
A Review of Controversial Issues in the Management of Head and Neck Cancer: A Swiss Multidisciplinary and Multi-Institutional Patterns of Care Study-Part 2 (Radiation Oncology).头颈部癌管理中的争议问题综述:瑞士多学科和多机构护理模式研究 - 第2部分(放射肿瘤学)
Front Oncol. 2019 Oct 24;9:1126. doi: 10.3389/fonc.2019.01126. eCollection 2019.
8
Impact of clinical complete response on treatment outcomes in patients with locally advanced HPV-negative oropharyngeal squamous cell carcinoma.HPV 阴性局部晚期口咽鳞状细胞癌患者临床完全缓解对治疗结局的影响。
J Cancer Res Clin Oncol. 2020 Feb;146(2):477-483. doi: 10.1007/s00432-019-03075-y. Epub 2019 Nov 4.
9
Individual patient data network meta-analysis using either restricted mean survival time difference or hazard ratios: is there a difference? A case study on locoregionally advanced nasopharyngeal carcinomas.个体患者数据网络荟萃分析使用受限平均生存时间差或风险比:有区别吗?一项局部晚期鼻咽癌的病例研究。
Syst Rev. 2019 Apr 15;8(1):96. doi: 10.1186/s13643-019-0984-x.
10
Altered fractionation radiotherapy with or without chemotherapy in the treatment of head and neck cancer: a network meta-analysis.头颈部癌治疗中采用或不采用化疗的分割放疗改变:一项网状荟萃分析
Onco Targets Ther. 2018 Sep 4;11:5465-5483. doi: 10.2147/OTT.S172018. eCollection 2018.