• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

相似文献

1
Direct-acting antiviral therapy for hepatitis C: attitudes regarding future use.直接作用抗病毒疗法治疗丙型肝炎:对未来使用的态度。
Dig Dis Sci. 2011 May;56(5):1509-15. doi: 10.1007/s10620-011-1604-3. Epub 2011 Feb 19.
2
Association of the Extension for Community Healthcare Outcomes Project With Use of Direct-Acting Antiviral Treatment Among US Adults With Hepatitis C.社区医疗保健结果项目扩展与美国丙型肝炎成人直接抗病毒治疗使用率的关联。
JAMA Netw Open. 2021 Jul 1;4(7):e2115523. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2021.15523.
3
[The impact of direct-acting antiviral therapy on the diagnosis of hepatitis-C virus-associated hepatocellular carcinoma].[直接抗病毒治疗对丙型肝炎病毒相关肝细胞癌诊断的影响]
Nihon Shokakibyo Gakkai Zasshi. 2018;115(2):184-194. doi: 10.11405/nisshoshi.115.184.
4
Patient and healthcare provider experiences of hepatitis C treatment with direct-acting antivirals in Rwanda: a qualitative exploration of barriers and facilitators.卢旺达直接作用抗病毒药物治疗丙型肝炎的患者和医疗服务提供者体验:对障碍和促进因素的定性探索。
BMC Public Health. 2020 Jun 16;20(1):946. doi: 10.1186/s12889-020-09000-0.
5
Direct-Acting Antiviral Therapy Restores Immune Tolerance to Patients With Hepatitis C Virus-Induced Cryoglobulinemia Vasculitis.直接作用抗病毒疗法恢复丙型肝炎病毒相关冷球蛋白血症血管炎患者的免疫耐受。
Gastroenterology. 2017 Jun;152(8):2052-2062.e2. doi: 10.1053/j.gastro.2017.02.037. Epub 2017 Mar 6.
6
Effectiveness and cost of hepatitis C virus cryoglobulinaemia vasculitis treatment: From interferon-based to direct-acting antivirals era.丙型肝炎病毒冷球蛋白血症血管炎治疗的有效性和成本:从基于干扰素到直接作用抗病毒药物时代。
Liver Int. 2017 Dec;37(12):1805-1813. doi: 10.1111/liv.13465. Epub 2017 May 29.
7
Opportunistic treatment of hepatitis C virus infection (OPPORTUNI-C): study protocol for a pragmatic stepped wedge cluster randomized trial of immediate versus outpatient treatment initiation among hospitalized people who inject drugs.机会性治疗丙型肝炎病毒感染(OPPORTUNI-C):一项在住院吸毒者中进行即时与门诊治疗启动的实用阶梯楔形集群随机试验的研究方案。
Trials. 2020 Jun 15;21(1):524. doi: 10.1186/s13063-020-04434-8.
8
An update on direct antiviral agents for the treatment of hepatitis C.丙型肝炎直接抗病毒药物治疗的最新进展。
Expert Opin Pharmacother. 2021 Sep;22(13):1729-1741. doi: 10.1080/14656566.2021.1921737. Epub 2021 May 11.
9
Direct-acting antivirals after successful treatment of early hepatocellular carcinoma improve survival in HCV-cirrhotic patients.直接作用抗病毒药物治疗早期肝细胞癌后可改善 HCV 肝硬化患者的生存。
J Hepatol. 2019 Aug;71(2):265-273. doi: 10.1016/j.jhep.2019.03.027. Epub 2019 Apr 6.
10
Direct-acting antiviral treatment for hepatitis C virus infection and risk of incident liver cancer: a retrospective cohort study.直接作用抗病毒药物治疗丙型肝炎病毒感染与肝癌发病风险:一项回顾性队列研究。
Aliment Pharmacol Ther. 2018 May;47(9):1278-1287. doi: 10.1111/apt.14593. Epub 2018 Mar 7.

引用本文的文献

1
Influence of treatment complexity on adherence and incidence of blips in HIV/HCV coinfected patients.治疗复杂性对 HIV/HCV 合并感染患者的依从性和病毒学突破发生率的影响。
J Manag Care Spec Pharm. 2015 Feb;21(2):153-7. doi: 10.18553/jmcp.2015.21.2.153.
2
Chronic hepatitis C in Western Canada: a survey of practice patterns among gastroenterologists in Alberta and British Columbia.加拿大西部慢性丙型肝炎:艾伯塔省和不列颠哥伦比亚省胃肠病学家实践模式调查。
Can J Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2014 Jan;28(1):e1-4. doi: 10.1155/2014/651717. Epub 2013 Nov 8.
3
A survey of hepatitis C treatment clinical practice patterns using the newly approved protease inhibitors.一项使用新批准的蛋白酶抑制剂的丙型肝炎治疗临床实践模式调查。
J Clin Gastroenterol. 2013 Oct;47(9):800-6. doi: 10.1097/MCG.0b013e31828a37c0.
4
The protease inhibitor era: an opportunity to improve the quality of care.
Dig Dis Sci. 2011 May;56(5):1252-4. doi: 10.1007/s10620-011-1674-2.

本文引用的文献

1
Efficacy of boceprevir, an NS3 protease inhibitor, in combination with peginterferon alfa-2b and ribavirin in treatment-naive patients with genotype 1 hepatitis C infection (SPRINT-1): an open-label, randomised, multicentre phase 2 trial.Boceprevir,一种 NS3 蛋白酶抑制剂,联合聚乙二醇干扰素 alfa-2b 和利巴韦林治疗初治基因 1 型丙型肝炎感染患者的疗效(SPRINT-1):一项开放标签、随机、多中心 2 期临床试验。
Lancet. 2010 Aug 28;376(9742):705-16. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(10)60934-8. Epub 2010 Aug 6.
2
Telaprevir for previously treated chronic HCV infection.替拉瑞韦治疗既往治疗的慢性 HCV 感染。
N Engl J Med. 2010 Apr 8;362(14):1292-303. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa0908014.
3
Effectiveness of hepatitis C treatment with pegylated interferon and ribavirin in urban minority patients.聚乙二醇干扰素联合利巴韦林治疗城市少数民族丙型肝炎患者的疗效。
Hepatology. 2010 Apr;51(4):1137-43. doi: 10.1002/hep.23429.
4
Resistance to direct antiviral agents in patients with hepatitis C virus infection.丙型肝炎病毒感染患者对直接抗病毒药物的耐药性。
Gastroenterology. 2010 Feb;138(2):447-62. doi: 10.1053/j.gastro.2009.11.055. Epub 2009 Dec 16.
5
Telaprevir and peginterferon with or without ribavirin for chronic HCV infection.特拉匹韦与聚乙二醇干扰素联合或不联合利巴韦林用于慢性丙型肝炎病毒感染的治疗。
N Engl J Med. 2009 Apr 30;360(18):1839-50. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa0807650.
6
Telaprevir with peginterferon and ribavirin for chronic HCV genotype 1 infection.特拉匹韦联合聚乙二醇干扰素和利巴韦林用于慢性丙型肝炎1型感染
N Engl J Med. 2009 Apr 30;360(18):1827-38. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa0806104.
7
Diagnosis, management, and treatment of hepatitis C: an update.丙型肝炎的诊断、管理与治疗:最新进展
Hepatology. 2009 Apr;49(4):1335-74. doi: 10.1002/hep.22759.
8
Dynamic hepatitis C virus genotypic and phenotypic changes in patients treated with the protease inhibitor telaprevir.使用蛋白酶抑制剂特拉匹韦治疗的患者中丙型肝炎病毒的动态基因和表型变化。
Gastroenterology. 2007 May;132(5):1767-77. doi: 10.1053/j.gastro.2007.02.037. Epub 2007 Feb 21.
9
Global challenges in liver disease.肝病领域的全球挑战。
Hepatology. 2006 Sep;44(3):521-6. doi: 10.1002/hep.21347.
10
Peginterferon and ribavirin treatment in African American and Caucasian American patients with hepatitis C genotype 1.聚乙二醇干扰素和利巴韦林治疗非裔美国人和高加索裔美国人1型丙型肝炎患者。
Gastroenterology. 2006 Aug;131(2):470-7. doi: 10.1053/j.gastro.2006.06.008.

直接作用抗病毒疗法治疗丙型肝炎:对未来使用的态度。

Direct-acting antiviral therapy for hepatitis C: attitudes regarding future use.

机构信息

Department of Medicine, Albert Einstein College of Medicine, Montefiore Medical Center, Bronx, NY, USA.

出版信息

Dig Dis Sci. 2011 May;56(5):1509-15. doi: 10.1007/s10620-011-1604-3. Epub 2011 Feb 19.

DOI:10.1007/s10620-011-1604-3
PMID:21336604
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC3082020/
Abstract

INTRODUCTION

Response to current therapy of hepatitis C virus (HCV) is suboptimal. Direct-acting antiviral therapies (DAA) are expected to improve treatment outcomes. Additional treatments for HCV will invariably make therapeutic choices and patient management more complex. We hypothesize that current perceptions regarding the complexity of DAA therapy will influence attitudes towards future use by practitioners who are currently treating HCV.

METHODS

An Internet-based survey was sent to 10,082 AASLD and AGA members to determine if they treat HCV infection, their knowledge of DAA therapies, attitudes towards current and future HCV treatments, and if they participated in clinical trials using DAA agents.

RESULTS

Out of a total of 1,757 individuals responding to the survey, 75% treat HCV; 79% were MDs, 67% were Gastroenterologists, and 24% were Hepatologists. Of the respondents, 77% indicated they were "very aware" or "aware" of DAA therapies, 20% participated in clinical trials, and 3% had minimal knowledge of DAA agents. Comparing treatment "today" versus in the future when DAAs were available, 85 vs. 81% would treat (p = 0.0054), 6 vs. 10% would refer to an "HCV expert" (p = 0.016), and 1% would refer to an ID specialist. Of respondents with "minimal knowledge" of DAA, 52% stated that they would use them in the future.

CONCLUSIONS

Although the majority of respondents appear ready to utilize DAA agents in the future, referrals to "hepatitis C experts" will increase. More than half of respondents with "minimal knowledge" of DAA therapies also appear to be willing to utilize these compounds, raising concerns regarding their inappropriate use. Broad education of healthcare providers to prevent inappropriate use of these agents will be critical.

摘要

简介

目前对丙型肝炎病毒 (HCV) 的治疗效果并不理想。直接作用的抗病毒治疗 (DAA) 有望改善治疗效果。HCV 的额外治疗将不可避免地使治疗选择和患者管理更加复杂。我们假设,目前对 DAA 治疗复杂性的看法将影响目前正在治疗 HCV 的从业者对未来使用的态度。

方法

我们向 AASLD 和 AGA 的 10082 名成员发送了一项基于互联网的调查,以确定他们是否治疗 HCV 感染,他们对 DAA 治疗的了解,对当前和未来 HCV 治疗的态度,以及他们是否参与了使用 DAA 药物的临床试验。

结果

在总共回复调查的 1757 个人中,75%的人治疗 HCV;79%是 MD,67%是胃肠病学家,24%是肝病学家。在受访者中,77%的人表示他们“非常了解”或“了解”DAA 治疗,20%的人参与了临床试验,3%的人对 DAA 药物知之甚少。与今天治疗 HCV 相比,当 DAA 可用时,85%vs.81%的人会治疗(p = 0.0054),6%vs.10%的人会推荐给“HCV 专家”(p = 0.016),1%的人会推荐给 ID 专家。对于对 DAA 知之甚少的受访者,52%的人表示将来会使用它们。

结论

尽管大多数受访者似乎准备在未来使用 DAA 药物,但对“丙型肝炎专家”的推荐将会增加。超过一半对 DAA 治疗知之甚少的受访者似乎也愿意使用这些化合物,这引起了人们对其不当使用的担忧。广泛教育医疗保健提供者以防止这些药物的不当使用将是至关重要的。