Suppr超能文献

利用 CellSearch(®) 系统进行循环肿瘤细胞计数的外部质量保证:一项可行性研究。

External quality assurance of circulating tumor cell enumeration using the CellSearch(®) system: a feasibility study.

机构信息

Department of Medical Oncology, Erasmus Medical Center, Rotterdam, The Netherlands.

出版信息

Cytometry B Clin Cytom. 2011 Mar;80(2):112-8. doi: 10.1002/cyto.b.20573. Epub 2010 Nov 10.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Circulating tumor cells (CTCs) are cells that have detached from solid tumors and entered the blood. CTCs can be detected, among others, by semi-automated immunomagnetic enrichment and image cytometry using CellSearch® (Veridex, Raritan, NJ). We studied the feasibility of external quality assurance (EQA) of the entire CellSearch procedure from blood draw to interpretation of results in multiple laboratories.

METHODS

Blood samples from six cancer patients and controls were distributed to 14 independent laboratories to test between-laboratory, between-assay, and between-instrument variation. Additionally, between-operator variability was assessed through the interpretation of blinded images of all blood samples on a website.

RESULTS

Shipment and storage of samples had no influence on CTC values. Between-instrument (coefficient of variation (CV) < 12%) and between-assay variation was low (CV ≤ 20%), indicating high reproducibility. However, between-laboratory CV ranged from 45 to 64%. Although inter-operator agreement on image interpretation (Fleiss' κ statistics) ranged from "substantial" to "almost perfect," image interpretation, particularly of samples containing high numbers of apoptotic cells, was the main contributor to between-laboratory variation.

CONCLUSIONS

This multicenter study shows the feasibility of an EQA program for CTC detection in patient samples, and the importance of continuation of such a program for the harmonization of CTC enumeration.

摘要

背景

循环肿瘤细胞(CTCs)是从实体瘤中脱落并进入血液的细胞。CTCs 可以通过半自动免疫磁珠富集和使用 CellSearch®(Veridex,Raritan,NJ)的图像细胞计数来检测。我们研究了在多个实验室中从采血到结果解释的整个 CellSearch 过程进行外部质量保证(EQA)的可行性。

方法

将来自 6 名癌症患者和对照者的血液样本分发给 14 个独立实验室,以测试实验室间、测定间和仪器间的变异。此外,通过在网站上对所有血液样本的盲样图像进行解释来评估操作人员间的可变性。

结果

样本的运输和储存对 CTC 值没有影响。仪器间(变异系数(CV)<12%)和测定间的变异性较低(CV≤20%),表明具有高重复性。然而,实验室间的 CV 范围为 45%至 64%。虽然图像解释的操作者间一致性(Fleiss'κ统计量)范围为“中等”到“几乎完美”,但图像解释,特别是对含有大量凋亡细胞的样本的解释,是造成实验室间变异的主要因素。

结论

这项多中心研究表明,在患者样本中进行 CTC 检测的 EQA 计划是可行的,并且继续进行此类计划对于 CTC 计数的协调化非常重要。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验