Swiss Center for Affective Sciences, University of Geneva, Switzerland; Laboratory for the Study of Emotion Elicitation and Expression (E3 Lab), Department of Psychology, FPSE, University of Geneva, Switzerland.
Swiss Center for Affective Sciences, University of Geneva, Switzerland; Laboratory for the Study of Emotion Elicitation and Expression (E3 Lab), Department of Psychology, FPSE, University of Geneva, Switzerland.
Neuropsychologia. 2011 Apr;49(5):1067-1082. doi: 10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2011.02.020. Epub 2011 Feb 21.
Emotion Regulation (ER) includes different mechanisms aiming at volitionally modulating emotional responses, including cognitive re-evaluation (re-appraisal; REAP) or inhibition of emotion expression and behavior (expressive suppression; ESUP). However, despite the importance of these ER strategies, previous functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI) studies have not sufficiently disentangled the specific neural impact of REAP versus ESUP on brain responses to different kinds of emotion-eliciting events. Moreover, although different effects have been reported for stimulus valence (positive vs. negative), no study has systematically investigated how ER may change emotional processing as a function of particular stimulus content variables (i.e., social vs. nonsocial). Our fMRI study directly compared brain activation to visual scenes during the use of different ER strategies, relative to a "natural" viewing condition, but also examined the effects of ER as a function of the social versus nonsocial content of scenes, in addition to their negative versus positive valence (by manipulating these factors orthogonally in a 2×2 factorial design). Our data revealed that several prefrontal cortical areas were differentially recruited during either REAP or ESUP, independent of the valence and content of images. In addition, selective modulations by either REAP or ESUP were found depending on the negative valence of scenes (medial fusiform gyrus, anterior insula, dmPFC), and on their nonsocial (middle insula) or social (bilateral amygdala, mPFC, posterior cingulate) significance. Furthermore, we observed a significant lateralization in the amygdala for the effect of the two different ER strategies, with a predominant modulation by REAP on the left side but by ESUP on the right side. Taken together, these results do not only highlight the distributed nature of neural changes induced by ER, but also reveal the specific impact of different strategies (REAP or ESUP), and the specific sites implicated by different dimensions of emotional information (social or negative).
情绪调节(ER)包括不同的机制,旨在有目的地调节情绪反应,包括认知重评(再评价;REAP)或抑制情绪表达和行为(表达抑制;ESUP)。然而,尽管这些 ER 策略很重要,但以前的功能磁共振成像(fMRI)研究并没有充分区分 REAP 与 ESUP 对不同类型情绪诱发事件的大脑反应的具体神经影响。此外,尽管已经报道了不同的刺激效价(积极与消极)对情绪调节的影响,但没有研究系统地研究了情绪调节如何根据特定的刺激内容变量(即社会与非社会)来改变情绪处理。我们的 fMRI 研究直接比较了在使用不同 ER 策略时相对于“自然”观看条件下大脑对视觉场景的激活,同时还研究了 ER 作为场景社会与非社会内容以及其正负效价的函数的影响(通过在 2×2 因子设计中正交地操纵这些因素)。我们的数据显示,在前额叶皮质的几个区域,无论图像的效价和内容如何,在进行 REAP 或 ESUP 时都会有不同程度的招募。此外,根据场景的负效价(内侧梭状回、前岛叶、dmPFC)以及非社会性(中脑岛)或社会性(双侧杏仁核、mPFC、后扣带回)意义,发现了由 REAP 或 ESUP 选择性调节的区域。此外,我们还观察到杏仁核的左右侧对两种不同 ER 策略的影响存在显著的偏侧化,REAP 主要调节左侧,而 ESUP 主要调节右侧。总的来说,这些结果不仅突出了 ER 引起的神经变化的分布式性质,还揭示了不同策略(REAP 或 ESUP)的具体影响,以及不同情绪信息维度(社会或负性)所涉及的特定部位。