Suppr超能文献

使用距离调节社交情境下情绪反应的神经相关因素。

Neural correlates of using distancing to regulate emotional responses to social situations.

机构信息

James J Peters VA Medical Center, Bronx, NY 10468, USA.

出版信息

Neuropsychologia. 2010 May;48(6):1813-22. doi: 10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2010.03.002. Epub 2010 Mar 11.

Abstract

Cognitive reappraisal is a commonly used and highly adaptive strategy for emotion regulation that has been studied in healthy volunteers. Most studies to date have focused on forms of reappraisal that involve reinterpreting the meaning of stimuli and have intermixed social and non-social emotional stimuli. Here we examined the neural correlates of the regulation of negative emotion elicited by social situations using a less studied form of reappraisal known as distancing. Whole brain fMRI data were obtained as participants viewed aversive and neutral social scenes with instructions to either simply look at and respond naturally to the images or to downregulate their emotional responses by distancing. Three key findings were obtained accompanied with the reduced aversive response behaviorally. First, across both instruction types, aversive social images activated the amygdala. Second, across both image types, distancing activated the precuneus and posterior cingulate cortex (PCC), intraparietal sulci (IPS), and middle/superior temporal gyrus (M/STG). Third, when distancing one's self from aversive images, activity increased in dorsal anterior cingulate (dACC), medial prefrontal cortex (mPFC), lateral prefrontal cortex, precuneus and PCC, IPS, and M/STG, meanwhile, and decreased in the amygdala. These findings demonstrate that distancing from aversive social cues modulates amygdala activity via engagement of networks implicated in social perception, perspective-taking, and attentional allocation.

摘要

认知重评是一种常用于情绪调节的高度适应性策略,已在健康志愿者中进行了研究。迄今为止,大多数研究都集中在重新解释刺激意义的重评形式上,并混合了社会和非社会情感刺激。在这里,我们使用一种称为距离的研究较少的重评形式来检查调节社会情境引起的负面情绪的神经相关性。当参与者观看带有指令的厌恶和中性社交场景时,会获得全脑 fMRI 数据,这些指令要么只是观察并自然地对图像做出反应,要么通过距离来抑制他们的情绪反应。在行为上减少厌恶反应的同时,获得了三个关键发现。首先,在两种指令类型中,厌恶的社交图像都会激活杏仁核。其次,在两种图像类型中,距离都会激活顶内沟(IPS)和中/上颞叶(M/STG)。第三,当人们将自己与厌恶的图像拉开距离时,背侧前扣带(dACC)、内侧前额叶皮层(mPFC)、外侧前额叶皮层、顶内沟和后扣带皮层(PCC)、IPS 和 M/STG 的活动增加,而杏仁核的活动减少。这些发现表明,通过参与涉及社会感知、换位思考和注意力分配的网络,从厌恶的社交线索中拉开距离可以调节杏仁核的活动。

相似文献

1
Neural correlates of using distancing to regulate emotional responses to social situations.
Neuropsychologia. 2010 May;48(6):1813-22. doi: 10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2010.03.002. Epub 2010 Mar 11.
2
The neural bases of distraction and reappraisal.
J Cogn Neurosci. 2010 Feb;22(2):248-62. doi: 10.1162/jocn.2009.21243.
3
How to regulate emotion? Neural networks for reappraisal and distraction.
Cereb Cortex. 2011 Jun;21(6):1379-88. doi: 10.1093/cercor/bhq216. Epub 2010 Nov 1.
4
Effects of emotion regulation strategy on brain responses to the valence and social content of visual scenes.
Neuropsychologia. 2011 Apr;49(5):1067-1082. doi: 10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2011.02.020. Epub 2011 Feb 21.
5
Regulation of emotional responses elicited by threat-related stimuli.
Hum Brain Mapp. 2007 May;28(5):409-23. doi: 10.1002/hbm.20291.
6
7
Lasting effects of cognitive emotion regulation: neural correlates of reinterpretation and distancing.
Soc Cogn Affect Neurosci. 2021 Mar 5;16(3):268-279. doi: 10.1093/scan/nsaa159.
8
Brain functional correlates of emotion regulation across adolescence and young adulthood.
Hum Brain Mapp. 2016 Jan;37(1):7-19. doi: 10.1002/hbm.22905. Epub 2015 Nov 24.
9
Beyond arousal and valence: the importance of the biological versus social relevance of emotional stimuli.
Cogn Affect Behav Neurosci. 2012 Mar;12(1):115-39. doi: 10.3758/s13415-011-0062-x.

引用本文的文献

3
Acceptance and commitment therapy for nurses' sleep, rumination, psychological flexibility, and it's neural mechanism: A randomized controlled fNIRS study.
Int J Clin Health Psychol. 2025 Jan-Mar;25(1):100543. doi: 10.1016/j.ijchp.2025.100543. Epub 2025 Jan 15.
4
The implication of alexithymia in personality disorders: a systematic review.
BMC Psychiatry. 2024 Oct 1;24(1):647. doi: 10.1186/s12888-024-06083-6.
7
Social good reappraisal as a novel and effective emotion regulation strategy.
PLoS One. 2024 Jun 25;19(6):e0305756. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0305756. eCollection 2024.
9
10
Are reframing strategies more effective than empathy in processing trauma reports? A pilot study.
Front Psychol. 2023 Jul 3;14:1150475. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2023.1150475. eCollection 2023.

本文引用的文献

1
Cognitive Emotion Regulation: Insights from Social Cognitive and Affective Neuroscience.
Curr Dir Psychol Sci. 2008 Apr;17(2):153-158. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-8721.2008.00566.x.
3
Individual differences in some (but not all) medial prefrontal regions reflect cognitive demand while regulating unpleasant emotion.
Neuroimage. 2009 Sep;47(3):852-63. doi: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2009.05.069. Epub 2009 May 30.
4
Amygdala-frontal connectivity during emotion regulation.
Soc Cogn Affect Neurosci. 2007 Dec;2(4):303-12. doi: 10.1093/scan/nsm029.
5
Development during adolescence of the neural processing of social emotion.
J Cogn Neurosci. 2009 Sep;21(9):1736-50. doi: 10.1162/jocn.2009.21121.
6
Prefrontal-subcortical pathways mediating successful emotion regulation.
Neuron. 2008 Sep 25;59(6):1037-50. doi: 10.1016/j.neuron.2008.09.006.
8
10
BPD's interpersonal hypersensitivity phenotype: a gene-environment-developmental model.
J Pers Disord. 2008 Feb;22(1):22-41. doi: 10.1521/pedi.2008.22.1.22.

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验