• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

SNOMED CT节省击键次数:量化语义自动完成

SNOMED CT Saves Keystrokes: Quantifying Semantic Autocompletion.

作者信息

Sevenster Merlijn, Aleksovski Zharko

机构信息

Philips Research, Eindhoven, The Netherlands.

出版信息

AMIA Annu Symp Proc. 2010 Nov 13;2010:742-6.

PMID:21347077
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC3041304/
Abstract

In many applications autocompletion functionality saves keystrokes, increases user experience, and helps the user to comply with standardized terminology. Intuitively, the more context information we have about the user, the more accurate autocompletion suggestions we can give. In this paper we research the added value of contextual information for autocompletion algorithms, measured as the average number of saved keystrokes. In our experiments, a context is represented as a set of SNOMED CT terms. Using the structure of SNOMED CT we determine the semantic distance of each SNOMED CT term to the context terms. The resulting distance function is injected in the autocompletion algorithms to reward terms that are semantically close to the context. Our results show that semantic enhancement saves up to 18% of keystrokes, in addition to the percentage of keystrokes saved for the non-semantic base algorithm.

摘要

在许多应用中,自动完成功能节省了击键次数,提升了用户体验,并帮助用户遵循标准化术语。直观地说,我们拥有的关于用户的上下文信息越多,就能给出越准确的自动完成建议。在本文中,我们研究上下文信息对于自动完成算法的附加价值,以节省的平均击键次数来衡量。在我们的实验中,上下文由一组SNOMED CT术语表示。利用SNOMED CT的结构,我们确定每个SNOMED CT术语与上下文术语的语义距离。由此产生的距离函数被注入到自动完成算法中,以奖励那些在语义上与上下文接近的术语。我们的结果表明,除了非语义基础算法节省的击键百分比之外,语义增强还能节省高达18%的击键次数。

相似文献

1
SNOMED CT Saves Keystrokes: Quantifying Semantic Autocompletion.SNOMED CT节省击键次数:量化语义自动完成
AMIA Annu Symp Proc. 2010 Nov 13;2010:742-6.
2
Algorithmic and user study of an autocompletion algorithm on a large medical vocabulary.大型医学词汇自动补全算法的算法和用户研究。
J Biomed Inform. 2012 Feb;45(1):107-19. doi: 10.1016/j.jbi.2011.09.004. Epub 2011 Oct 11.
3
Analyzing structural changes in SNOMED CT's Bacterial infectious diseases using a visual semantic delta.使用视觉语义差异分析SNOMED CT细菌性传染病的结构变化。
J Biomed Inform. 2017 Mar;67:101-116. doi: 10.1016/j.jbi.2017.02.006. Epub 2017 Feb 12.
4
A comparative analysis of the density of the SNOMED CT conceptual content for semantic harmonization.用于语义协调的SNOMED CT概念内容密度的比较分析。
Artif Intell Med. 2015 May;64(1):29-40. doi: 10.1016/j.artmed.2015.03.002. Epub 2015 Apr 2.
5
Automatic SNOMED CT coding of Chinese clinical terms via attention-based semantic matching.通过基于注意力的语义匹配对中文临床术语进行自动SNOMED CT编码。
Int J Med Inform. 2022 Mar;159:104676. doi: 10.1016/j.ijmedinf.2021.104676. Epub 2021 Dec 28.
6
Mismatches between major subhierarchies and semantic tags in SNOMED CT.SNOMED CT 中的主要子层次结构和语义标签之间的不匹配。
J Biomed Inform. 2018 May;81:1-15. doi: 10.1016/j.jbi.2018.02.009. Epub 2018 Feb 17.
7
Using SNOMED CT to represent two interface terminologies.使用SNOMED CT来表示两种接口术语。
J Am Med Inform Assoc. 2009 Jan-Feb;16(1):81-8. doi: 10.1197/jamia.M2694. Epub 2008 Oct 24.
8
Spark-MCA: Large-scale, Exhaustive Formal Concept Analysis for Evaluating the Semantic Completeness of SNOMED CT.Spark-MCA:用于评估SNOMED CT语义完整性的大规模详尽形式概念分析
AMIA Annu Symp Proc. 2018 Apr 16;2017:1931-1940. eCollection 2017.
9
Quantitative analysis of manual annotation of clinical text samples.临床文本样本的人工标注定量分析。
Int J Med Inform. 2019 Mar;123:37-48. doi: 10.1016/j.ijmedinf.2018.12.011. Epub 2018 Dec 31.
10
Using a snowflake data model and autocompletion to support diagnostic coding in acute care hospitals.使用雪花数据模型和自动完成功能来支持急症医院的诊断编码。
Stud Health Technol Inform. 2015;210:334-8.

引用本文的文献

1
Words prediction based on N-gram model for free-text entry in electronic health records.基于N元语法模型的电子健康记录自由文本输入中的单词预测
Health Inf Sci Syst. 2019 Feb 28;7(1):6. doi: 10.1007/s13755-019-0065-5. eCollection 2019 Dec.
2
Comparison of a semi-automatic annotation tool and a natural language processing application for the generation of clinical statement entries.用于生成临床陈述条目的半自动注释工具与自然语言处理应用程序的比较。
J Am Med Inform Assoc. 2015 Jan;22(1):132-42. doi: 10.1136/amiajnl-2014-002991. Epub 2014 Oct 20.

本文引用的文献

1
SNOMED clinical terms: overview of the development process and project status.医学系统命名法临床术语:开发过程与项目状态概述
Proc AMIA Symp. 2001:662-6.