• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

大型医学词汇自动补全算法的算法和用户研究。

Algorithmic and user study of an autocompletion algorithm on a large medical vocabulary.

机构信息

Healthcare Information Management, Philips Research, High Tech Campus 34, 5656 AA Eindhoven, The Netherlands.

出版信息

J Biomed Inform. 2012 Feb;45(1):107-19. doi: 10.1016/j.jbi.2011.09.004. Epub 2011 Oct 11.

DOI:10.1016/j.jbi.2011.09.004
PMID:22019376
Abstract

INTRODUCTION

Autocompletion supports human-computer interaction in software applications that let users enter textual data. We will be inspired by the use case in which medical professionals enter ontology concepts, catering the ongoing demand for structured and standardized data in medicine.

OBJECTIVES

Goal is to give an algorithmic analysis of one particular autocompletion algorithm, called multi-prefix matching algorithm, which suggests terms whose words' prefixes contain all words in the string typed by the user, e.g., in this sense, opt ner me matches optic nerve meningioma. Second we aim to investigate how well it supports users entering concepts from a large and comprehensive medical vocabulary (snomed ct).

METHODS

We give a concise description of the multi-prefix algorithm, and sketch how it can be optimized to meet required response time. Performance will be compared to a baseline algorithm, which gives suggestions that extend the string typed by the user to the right, e.g. optic nerve m gives optic nerve meningioma, but opt ner me does not. We conduct a user experiment in which 12 participants are invited to complete 40 snomed ct terms with the baseline algorithm and another set of 40 snomed ct terms with the multi-prefix algorithm.

RESULTS

Our results show that users need significantly fewer keystrokes when supported by the multi-prefix algorithm than when supported by the baseline algorithm.

CONCLUSIONS

The proposed algorithm is a competitive candidate for searching and retrieving terms from a large medical ontology.

摘要

简介

自动补全支持软件应用程序中的人机交互,使用户能够输入文本数据。我们将受到医疗专业人员输入本体概念的用例的启发,满足医学领域对结构化和标准化数据的持续需求。

目的

对一种特定的自动补全算法(称为多前缀匹配算法)进行算法分析,该算法根据用户输入的字符串的所有单词的前缀来建议术语,例如,在这种意义上,opt ner me 匹配视神经脑膜瘤。其次,我们旨在研究它如何支持用户从大型综合医学词汇(SNOMED CT)中输入概念。

方法

我们对多前缀算法进行了简洁的描述,并概述了如何对其进行优化以满足所需的响应时间。将性能与基线算法进行比较,基线算法会根据用户输入的字符串向右扩展建议,例如,optic nerve m 给出了视神经脑膜瘤,但 opt ner me 没有。我们进行了一项用户实验,邀请 12 名参与者使用基线算法完成 40 个 SNOMED CT 术语,使用多前缀算法完成另一组 40 个 SNOMED CT 术语。

结果

我们的结果表明,与基线算法相比,用户在使用多前缀算法时所需的击键次数明显减少。

结论

所提出的算法是从大型医学本体中搜索和检索术语的有竞争力的候选算法。

相似文献

1
Algorithmic and user study of an autocompletion algorithm on a large medical vocabulary.大型医学词汇自动补全算法的算法和用户研究。
J Biomed Inform. 2012 Feb;45(1):107-19. doi: 10.1016/j.jbi.2011.09.004. Epub 2011 Oct 11.
2
Representation of disorders of the newborn infant by SNOMED CT.新生儿疾病在SNOMED CT中的表示。
Stud Health Technol Inform. 2008;136:833-8.
3
SNOMED CT Saves Keystrokes: Quantifying Semantic Autocompletion.SNOMED CT节省击键次数:量化语义自动完成
AMIA Annu Symp Proc. 2010 Nov 13;2010:742-6.
4
Implementing rules to improve the quality of concept post-coordination with SNOMED CT.实施规则以提高与SNOMED CT进行概念后协调的质量。
Stud Health Technol Inform. 2010;160(Pt 2):1045-9.
5
An applied evaluation of SNOMED CT as a clinical vocabulary for the computerized diagnosis and problem list.作为用于计算机化诊断和问题列表的临床词汇的SNOMED CT应用评估。
AMIA Annu Symp Proc. 2003;2003:699-703.
6
SNOMED CT implementation: implications of choosing clinical findings or observable entities.SNOMED CT的实施:选择临床发现或可观察实体的影响。
Stud Health Technol Inform. 2011;169:809-13.
7
Cross-mapping APACHE IV "reasons for intensive care admission" classification to SNOMED CT.将急性生理学及慢性健康状况评分系统IV版“重症监护入院原因”分类交叉映射至医学系统命名法临床术语集(SNOMED CT)。
Stud Health Technol Inform. 2008;136:779-84.
8
What is the coverage of SNOMED CT®on scientific medical corpora?医学系统命名法临床术语(SNOMED CT®)在科学医学语料库中的覆盖范围如何?
Stud Health Technol Inform. 2011;169:814-8.
9
Semantic issues in integrating data from different models to achieve data interoperability.整合来自不同模型的数据以实现数据互操作性中的语义问题。
Stud Health Technol Inform. 2007;129(Pt 1):674-8.
10
Evaluation of SNOMED coverage of Veterans Health Administration terms.对退伍军人健康管理局术语的SNOMED覆盖范围的评估。
Stud Health Technol Inform. 2004;107(Pt 1):540-4.

引用本文的文献

1
Semantic Search for Large Scale Clinical Ontologies.大规模临床本体的语义搜索。
AMIA Annu Symp Proc. 2022 Feb 21;2021:910-919. eCollection 2021.
2
Words prediction based on N-gram model for free-text entry in electronic health records.基于N元语法模型的电子健康记录自由文本输入中的单词预测
Health Inf Sci Syst. 2019 Feb 28;7(1):6. doi: 10.1007/s13755-019-0065-5. eCollection 2019 Dec.
3
Ontoserver: a syndicated terminology server.Ontoserver:一个联合术语服务器。
J Biomed Semantics. 2018 Sep 17;9(1):24. doi: 10.1186/s13326-018-0191-z.
4
Comparison of a semi-automatic annotation tool and a natural language processing application for the generation of clinical statement entries.用于生成临床陈述条目的半自动注释工具与自然语言处理应用程序的比较。
J Am Med Inform Assoc. 2015 Jan;22(1):132-42. doi: 10.1136/amiajnl-2014-002991. Epub 2014 Oct 20.
5
A survey of SNOMED CT implementations.SNOMED CT 实施情况调查。
J Biomed Inform. 2013 Feb;46(1):87-96. doi: 10.1016/j.jbi.2012.09.006. Epub 2012 Oct 3.