• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

急性阑尾炎的保守治疗:综述

Conservative treatment of acute appendicitis: an overview.

作者信息

Wojciechowicz K H, Hoffkamp H J, van Hulst R A

机构信息

Maritime Medical Expertise Centre Royal Netherlands Navy, PO Box 10.000, 1780 CA Den Helder, The Netherlands.

出版信息

Int Marit Health. 2010;62(4):265-72.

PMID:21348022
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Although the standard treatment for appendicitis (since 1883) is an appendectomy, this is not always possible in a maritime or military setting. To avoid relying on improvisation in such situations this study examines the evidence for conservative management of appendicitis.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

PubMed was searched for studies on conservative treatment of appendicitis. Both prospective and retrospective studies with a well-defined description of the protocol were included.

RESULTS

Finally, 5 publications (a total of 342 patients) were included in this overview. For these reports, the success rate for conservative treatment of appendicitis is 90.8% (88-95%) with a risk of relapse within 12 months of 15.9% (5-37%). For complicated appendicitis these mean rates decrease to 89% (67-100%) and 9.8% (0-39.6%), respectively.

DISCUSSION AND CONCLUSIONS

This overview indicates that appendicitis can be safely and effectively treated conservatively. The studies differed in their treatment protocols. Appendicitis can best be treated with a third-generation cephalosporin and an imidazole derivative (2 days intravenously and 10 days orally). This is based on evidence from a combination of the studies presented here, and on expert opinion. Currently, this combination is the best available "evidence" on this topic.

摘要

背景

尽管阑尾炎的标准治疗方法(自1883年起)是阑尾切除术,但在海上或军事环境中并非总是可行。为避免在这种情况下依赖临时措施,本研究考察了阑尾炎保守治疗的证据。

材料与方法

在PubMed上搜索有关阑尾炎保守治疗的研究。纳入对方案有明确描述的前瞻性和回顾性研究。

结果

最终,本综述纳入了5篇文献(共342例患者)。对于这些报告,阑尾炎保守治疗的成功率为90.8%(88 - 95%),12个月内复发风险为15.9%(5 - 37%)。对于复杂性阑尾炎,这些平均比率分别降至89%(67 - 100%)和9.8%(0 - 39.6%)。

讨论与结论

本综述表明阑尾炎可以通过保守治疗安全有效地治愈。这些研究的治疗方案有所不同。阑尾炎最好用第三代头孢菌素和咪唑衍生物治疗(静脉注射2天,口服10天)。这是基于此处呈现的研究组合的证据以及专家意见。目前,这种组合是关于该主题的最佳可用“证据”。

相似文献

1
Conservative treatment of acute appendicitis: an overview.急性阑尾炎的保守治疗:综述
Int Marit Health. 2010;62(4):265-72.
2
A meta-analysis comparing conservative treatment versus acute appendectomy for complicated appendicitis (abscess or phlegmon).一项比较保守治疗与急性阑尾切除术治疗复杂性阑尾炎(脓肿或蜂窝织炎)的荟萃分析。
Surgery. 2010 Jun;147(6):818-29. doi: 10.1016/j.surg.2009.11.013. Epub 2010 Feb 10.
3
[Can acute appendicitis be treated by antibiotics and in what conditions?].[急性阑尾炎能用抗生素治疗吗?在什么情况下可以?]
J Chir (Paris). 2009 Oct;146 Spec No 1:17-21. doi: 10.1016/j.jchir.2009.08.033. Epub 2009 Oct 28.
4
[The efficacy of the conservative treatment of patients with acute appendicitis on board ships at sea].[海上船舶上急性阑尾炎患者保守治疗的疗效]
Vestn Khir Im I I Grek. 1992 May;148(5):144-50.
5
Conservative treatment in acute appendicitis.急性阑尾炎的保守治疗
JNMA J Nepal Med Assoc. 2010 Oct-Dec;50(180):295-9.
6
Conservative treatment of acute appendicitis: heresy or an effective and acceptable alternative to surgery?急性阑尾炎的保守治疗:异端邪说还是一种有效且可接受的手术替代方法?
Eur J Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2011 Feb;23(2):121-7. doi: 10.1097/MEG.0b013e32834233b6.
7
An evidence-based definition for perforated appendicitis derived from a prospective randomized trial.一项基于前瞻性随机试验得出的穿孔性阑尾炎的循证定义。
J Pediatr Surg. 2008 Dec;43(12):2242-5. doi: 10.1016/j.jpedsurg.2008.08.051.
8
Initial laparoscopic appendectomy versus initial nonoperative management and interval appendectomy for perforated appendicitis with abscess: a prospective, randomized trial.初始腹腔镜阑尾切除术与初始非手术治疗和脓肿穿孔性阑尾炎间隔阑尾切除术的前瞻性随机试验。
J Pediatr Surg. 2010 Jan;45(1):236-40. doi: 10.1016/j.jpedsurg.2009.10.039.
9
[Indications for medical treatment of acute appendicitis].[急性阑尾炎的药物治疗适应证]
Rev Prat. 2013 Apr;63(4):535-7, 540-1.
10
Comparison of operative and non operative management of acute appendicitis.急性阑尾炎手术治疗与非手术治疗的比较。
Ulus Travma Acil Cerrahi Derg. 2009 Sep;15(5):459-62.

引用本文的文献

1
Impacts of COVID-19 on Patients With Common Surgical Emergencies at the King Fahad Specialist Hospital in Buraidah, Saudi Arabia.新型冠状病毒肺炎对沙特阿拉伯布赖代法赫德国王专科医院常见外科急症患者的影响。
Cureus. 2022 Nov 24;14(11):e31868. doi: 10.7759/cureus.31868. eCollection 2022 Nov.
2
Are the immature granulocyte count and percentage important in continue medical treatment in acute appendicitis? A prospective, randomized, and controlled study.不成熟粒细胞计数和百分比在急性阑尾炎继续治疗中重要吗?一项前瞻性、随机和对照研究。
Ulus Travma Acil Cerrahi Derg. 2022 Jul;28(7):979-987. doi: 10.14744/tjtes.2021.76307.
3
Medical Treatment: An Emerging Standard in Acute Appendicitis?
医学治疗:急性阑尾炎的一种新兴标准?
Niger Med J. 2019 Sep-Oct;60(5):226-233. doi: 10.4103/nmj.NMJ_65_19. Epub 2019 Nov 26.
4
Clinical Management of Appendicitis.阑尾炎的临床管理
Visc Med. 2018 Dec;34(6):453-458. doi: 10.1159/000494883. Epub 2018 Nov 24.
5
Comparison of Outcomes of antibiotic Drugs and Appendectomy (CODA) trial: a protocol for the pragmatic randomised study of appendicitis treatment.抗生素与阑尾切除术疗效比较(CODA)试验:一项关于阑尾炎治疗的实用随机研究方案。
BMJ Open. 2017 Nov 15;7(11):e016117. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2017-016117.
6
Mandatory imaging cuts costs and reduces the rate of unnecessary surgeries in the diagnostic work-up of patients suspected of having appendicitis.强制性影像学检查可降低成本,并减少疑似阑尾炎患者诊断性检查中不必要手术的比例。
Eur Radiol. 2015 May;25(5):1464-70. doi: 10.1007/s00330-014-3531-0. Epub 2015 Jan 16.
7
Update on procalcitonin measurements.降钙素原检测的最新进展。
Ann Lab Med. 2014 Jul;34(4):263-73. doi: 10.3343/alm.2014.34.4.263. Epub 2014 Jun 19.