Ministry of Health, General Directorate of Pharmacy and Pharmaceuticals, Ankara, Turkey.
J Evid Based Med. 2009 Nov;2(4):242-51. doi: 10.1111/j.1756-5391.2009.01050.x.
Family medicine (also called general practice) is a specialty with a focus on primary care. In Turkey, not all primary care is provided by specialists. Efforts are underway to improve primary care by improving the provision of primary care, establishing referral chains, and having care provided by general practitioners after transition training or by family medicine specialists. We investigated the relationship between evidence-based medicine (EBM) and primary care in Turkey, to provide a snapshot of the current situation and baseline data to assess the effects of current and future reforms.
A cross-sectional survey was done of 375 primary care physicians: 138 general practitioners (GPs), 121 family medicine (FM) trainees, and 116 FM specialists. They were asked 30 questions assessing general characteristics, knowledge, and training in EBM; general attitudes towards EBM; resources used to support clinical decisions; possible barriers to EBM practice; and opinions on future practice of EBM. Data were analyzed with SPSS 12.0.
Compared with the other physicians, FM specialists had significantly more Internet access, used the Internet for medical purposes more often and for longer hours, had published more scientific papers, searched MEDLINE or similar databases more often, and were more confident about conducting literature searches. FM specialists had significantly higher rates of training in EBM and critical appraisal. For all types of physicians surveyed, the main reported barrier to practicing EBM was lack of training in EBM.
Attitudes toward EBM differ significantly between GPs and FM specialists working in primary care in Turkey, which we believe results in variation in medical provision. The differences between these two groups of physicians should be investigated further, and means of improving the provision of care should be reported to policy makers.
家庭医学(也称为全科医学)是专注于初级保健的专业。在土耳其,并非所有初级保健都由专家提供。正在努力通过改善初级保健的提供、建立转诊链以及在过渡培训后由全科医生或家庭医学专家提供护理来改善初级保健。我们调查了土耳其循证医学(EBM)与初级保健之间的关系,以了解当前情况并提供基线数据,以评估当前和未来改革的效果。
对 375 名初级保健医生进行了横断面调查:138 名全科医生(GP)、121 名家庭医学(FM)受训者和 116 名 FM 专家。他们被问及 30 个问题,评估 EBM 的一般特征、知识和培训;对 EBM 的一般态度;用于支持临床决策的资源;EBM 实践的可能障碍;以及对未来 EBM 实践的看法。使用 SPSS 12.0 分析数据。
与其他医生相比,FM 专家具有明显更多的互联网访问权限,更频繁、更长时间地将互联网用于医疗目的,发表了更多的科学论文,更频繁地搜索 MEDLINE 或类似数据库,并且对进行文献搜索更有信心。FM 专家接受 EBM 和批判性评估培训的比例明显更高。对于所有类型的被调查医生,实施 EBM 的主要报告障碍是缺乏 EBM 培训。
在土耳其从事初级保健的全科医生和家庭医学专家对 EBM 的态度存在显着差异,我们认为这导致了医疗服务的差异。应进一步调查这两组医生之间的差异,并向决策者报告改善护理提供的方法。