The best algorithm to confirm the diagnosis of HTLV-1 and HTLV-2 in at-risk individuals from São Paulo, Brazil.

The ability to confirm the diagnosis of human T-lymphotropic virus types 1 and 2 (HTLV-1 and HTLV-2) in at-risk individuals in São Paulo, Brazil by Western blotting (WB), conventional polymerase chain reaction (tax and pol PCR) and real-time PCR (pol) is compared. Seventy-three blood samples that were reactive in HTLV-1/2 serological screening enzyme immunoassays (EIAs) were evaluated. HTLV-1/2 was confirmed in 53 blood samples: 48 were positive by WB, 41 were positive by PCR and 42 scored positive by real-time PCR assays (37 of 48 WB-positive samples plus five WB-indeterminate samples that were further confirmed by sequencing). Although WB was able to detect more cases of HTLV-1/2 infection, the real-time PCR assay was able to discriminate between these two viruses and confirm an individual HTLV-1/HTLV-2 diagnosis in two HTLV WB-untyped samples and five WB-indeterminate samples. Because of the large number of WB-indeterminate samples and the cost of the WB assay in Brazil, it is proposed an algorithm that employs two EIAs for screening and then real-time PCR to confirm the infection, followed by testing any PCR-negative samples with the WB assay. This strategy reduces costs and improves the accuracy of the diagnosis of HTLV-1/2.