Department of Psychology, University of Michigan, 530 Church Street, Ann Arbor, MI 48109, USA.
J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn. 2010 Sep;36(5):1331-8. doi: 10.1037/a0019903.
Distortions of long-term memory (LTM) in the converging associates task are thought to arise from semantic associative processes and monitoring failures due to degraded verbatim and/or contextual memory. Sensory-based coding is traditionally considered more prevalent than meaning-based coding in short-term memory (STM), whereas the converse is true of LTM, leading to the expectation that false memory phenomena should be less robust in a canonical STM task. These expectations were violated in 2 experiments in which participants were shown lists of 4 semantically related words and were probed immediately following a filled 3- to 4-s retention interval or approximately 20 min later in a surprise recognition test. Corrected false recognition rates, confidence ratings, and Remember/Know judgments reveal similar false memory effects across STM and LTM conditions. These results indicate that compelling false memory illusions can be rapidly instantiated and that, consistent with unitary models of memory, they originate from processes that are not specific to LTM tasks.
在汇聚联想任务中,长时记忆(LTM)的扭曲被认为是由于语义联想过程和监测失败导致的,这是由于详细记忆和/或上下文记忆的退化。传统上认为,感觉编码比基于意义的编码在短期记忆(STM)中更为普遍,而 LTM 则相反,这导致人们期望在典型的 STM 任务中,错误记忆现象应该不那么稳健。在两个实验中,这些期望被违反了,在这两个实验中,参与者被展示了 4 个语义相关的单词列表,并在填充的 3 到 4 秒保留间隔后立即进行探测,或者在大约 20 分钟后在惊喜识别测试中进行探测。校正后的错误识别率、置信度评级和记住/知道判断揭示了 STM 和 LTM 条件下相似的错误记忆效应。这些结果表明,令人信服的错误记忆错觉可以迅速产生,并且与记忆的单一模型一致,它们源自不是特定于 LTM 任务的过程。