Haker E, Lundeberg T
Department of Physiology II, Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden.
Clin J Pain. 1990 Sep;6(3):221-6. doi: 10.1097/00002508-199009000-00009.
The purpose of this study was to compare the pain-alleviating effect of classical acupuncture with superficial needle insertion in 82 patients suffering from lateral epicondylalgia. Sessions were 20 min long, two to three times weekly with 10 treatments in all. Five acupuncture points were treated: LI 10, 11, 12, Lu 5, and SJ 5. After 10 treatments significant differences were observed between the groups favoring the classical acupuncture technique in relation to subjective and objective outcome. No such differences could be observed at the follow-ups after 3 months and 1 year. This study showed that classical "deep" acupuncture is superior to superficial needle insertion in the short-term symptomatic treatment of lateral epicondylalgia, but not at 3- and 12-month follow-up.
本研究旨在比较经典针刺法与浅刺法对82例外侧上髁炎患者的止痛效果。每次治疗时长20分钟,每周进行两到三次,共治疗10次。选取五个穴位进行针刺:手阳明大肠经的曲池(LI 10)、手三里(LI 11)、曲泽(LI 12),手太阴肺经的尺泽(Lu 5),以及手少阳三焦经的外关(SJ 5)。经过10次治疗后,在主观和客观疗效方面,两组间观察到显著差异,经典针刺法更具优势。在3个月和1年的随访中未观察到此类差异。本研究表明,在外侧上髁炎的短期症状治疗中,经典“深刺”法优于浅刺法,但在3个月和12个月随访时并非如此。