Suppr超能文献

针灸治疗肱骨外上髁炎:两种针灸技术的比较研究

Acupuncture treatment in epicondylalgia: a comparative study of two acupuncture techniques.

作者信息

Haker E, Lundeberg T

机构信息

Department of Physiology II, Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden.

出版信息

Clin J Pain. 1990 Sep;6(3):221-6. doi: 10.1097/00002508-199009000-00009.

Abstract

The purpose of this study was to compare the pain-alleviating effect of classical acupuncture with superficial needle insertion in 82 patients suffering from lateral epicondylalgia. Sessions were 20 min long, two to three times weekly with 10 treatments in all. Five acupuncture points were treated: LI 10, 11, 12, Lu 5, and SJ 5. After 10 treatments significant differences were observed between the groups favoring the classical acupuncture technique in relation to subjective and objective outcome. No such differences could be observed at the follow-ups after 3 months and 1 year. This study showed that classical "deep" acupuncture is superior to superficial needle insertion in the short-term symptomatic treatment of lateral epicondylalgia, but not at 3- and 12-month follow-up.

摘要

本研究旨在比较经典针刺法与浅刺法对82例外侧上髁炎患者的止痛效果。每次治疗时长20分钟,每周进行两到三次,共治疗10次。选取五个穴位进行针刺:手阳明大肠经的曲池(LI 10)、手三里(LI 11)、曲泽(LI 12),手太阴肺经的尺泽(Lu 5),以及手少阳三焦经的外关(SJ 5)。经过10次治疗后,在主观和客观疗效方面,两组间观察到显著差异,经典针刺法更具优势。在3个月和1年的随访中未观察到此类差异。本研究表明,在外侧上髁炎的短期症状治疗中,经典“深刺”法优于浅刺法,但在3个月和12个月随访时并非如此。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验