Department of Radiology, Rehabilitation and Physiotherapy, Universidad Complutense de Madrid, Madrid, Spain.
Rehabilitación San Fernando, Madrid, Spain.
Acupunct Med. 2021 Oct;39(5):405-422. doi: 10.1177/0964528420967364. Epub 2020 Dec 17.
The aim of this study was to evaluate the effect of acupuncture/electroacupuncture, alone or combined with other interventions, on pain intensity, pain-related disability, and strength in lateral epicondylalgia (LE) of musculoskeletal origin.
Electronic databases were searched for randomized clinical trials, where at least one group received acupuncture or electroacupuncture for LE of musculoskeletal origin. To be eligible, trials had to include humans and collect outcomes on pain intensity or pain-related disability in LE. Data were extracted by two reviewers. The risk of bias (RoB) of the trials was assessed using the Cochrane RoB tool, methodological quality was assessed with the Physiotherapy Evidence Database (PEDro) score, and the level of evidence was summarized using the Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development, and Evaluation (GRADE). Standardized mean differences (SMDs) using random effects were calculated.
A total of 14 trials (10 acupuncture) were included. The meta-analysis found a moderate effect size of acupuncture (SMD = -0.66, 95% confidence interval (CI) = -1.22 to -0.10), but not electroacupuncture (SMD = -0.08, 95% CI = -0.99 to 0.83), in the reduction of elbow pain as compared to a comparative group. Acupuncture exhibited a significant moderate effect size (SMD = -0.51, 95% CI = -0.91 to -0.11) in the improvement of related-disability. Acupuncture (SMD = 0.36, 95% CI = 0.16 to 0.57), but not electroacupuncture (SMD = 0.34, 95% CI = -0.29 to 0.98), exhibited a significant but small effect size on strength. Most significant effects were in the short term. The RoB was low but the heterogeneity of trial results led to a downgrading of the GRADE evidence level.
Low-level evidence suggests positive effects of acupuncture, but not electroacupuncture, for pain, related-disability, and strength, in LE of musculoskeletal origin, in the short term.
本研究旨在评估针灸/电针对源于肌肉骨骼的外侧肱骨上髁炎(LE)的疼痛强度、疼痛相关残疾和力量的影响,单独或联合其他干预措施。
电子数据库检索了至少有一组接受针灸或电针对源于肌肉骨骼的 LE 治疗的随机临床试验。试验必须包括人类,并收集 LE 疼痛强度或疼痛相关残疾的结果才有资格入选。由两名审查员提取数据。使用 Cochrane RoB 工具评估试验的偏倚风险(RoB),使用 Physiotherapy Evidence Database(PEDro)评分评估方法学质量,并使用 Grading of Recommendations Assessment,Development,and Evaluation(GRADE)总结证据水平。使用随机效应计算标准化均数差值(SMD)。
共纳入 14 项试验(10 项针灸)。荟萃分析发现,与对照组相比,针灸具有中等的治疗效果(SMD=-0.66,95%置信区间[CI]:-1.22 至-0.10),但电针无明显效果(SMD=-0.08,95%CI:-0.99 至 0.83)。针灸在改善相关残疾方面具有显著的中等治疗效果(SMD=-0.51,95%CI:-0.91 至-0.11)。针灸(SMD=0.36,95%CI:0.16 至 0.57),但电针(SMD=0.34,95%CI:-0.29 至 0.98),对力量的影响呈中等但较小。最显著的效果是在短期。RoB 较低,但试验结果的异质性导致 GRADE 证据水平降低。
低水平证据表明,针灸对源于肌肉骨骼的 LE 的疼痛、相关残疾和力量具有积极影响,但电针无明显效果,短期有效。