National Institute of Psychiatry, Calzada Mexico Xochimilco No. 101, Col. San Lorenzo Huipulco, Mexico City, Mexico.
Alcohol Clin Exp Res. 2011 Jul;35(7):1270-6. doi: 10.1111/j.1530-0277.2011.01462.x. Epub 2011 Feb 25.
Current research suggests that Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorder (DSM)-IV alcohol abuse and dependence form a unidimensional continuum in emergency department (ED) patients in 4 countries: Argentina, Mexico, Poland, and the United States. In this continuum of alcohol use disorder (AUD), there are no clear-cut distinctions between the criteria for dependence and abuse in the severity dimension based on prior results from item response theory (IRT) analysis. Nevertheless, it is desirable to find a threshold for identifying cases for clinical practice and cut-points of clinical utility in this continuum to distinguish between patients more or less affected by an AUD, using a scale of symptoms count.
Data from 5,193 patients in 7 ED sites in the same 4 countries (3,191 current drinkers) were used to study the structure, threshold, and possible cut-points for the diagnoses of AUD.
The proposed changes in the DSM-V, dropping the abuse item "legal problems" and adding an item on "craving," did not impact the IRT performance and unidimensionality of AUD in this sample. With a total set of 11 items (deleting "legal problems" and adding "craving" to the current set of DSM criteria), an endorsement of 2 or more criteria can be used as the threshold to define those with an AUD in clinical practice. Furthermore, we can distinguish at least 2 levels of clinical severity, 2 to 3 criteria (moderate), and 4 or more criteria (severe).
A dimensional approach to AUD using the proposed new set of criteria for the DSM-V can be used to propose a threshold and levels of severity. More research in different populations and countries is needed to further substantiate a threshold and cut-points that could be used in new formulations of substance use disorders.
当前的研究表明,在四个国家(阿根廷、墨西哥、波兰和美国)的急诊科(ED)患者中,《精神疾病诊断与统计手册》(DSM-IV)酒精滥用和依赖形成了一个单一维度的连续统。在这个酒精使用障碍(AUD)连续统中,基于项目反应理论(IRT)分析的先前结果,在严重程度维度上,依赖和滥用的标准之间没有明确的区别。然而,在这个连续统中找到一个识别病例的阈值和临床实用性的切点是很理想的,以便使用症状计数量表来区分受 AUD 影响程度不同的患者。
使用来自四个国家的七个 ED 地点的 5193 名患者的数据(3191 名当前饮酒者)来研究 AUD 诊断的结构、阈值和可能的切点。
DSM-V 中的拟议变更,即删除滥用项目“法律问题”并添加“渴望”项目,并没有影响该样本中 AUD 的 IRT 性能和单一维度性。使用一套总共 11 个项目(删除“法律问题”并将“渴望”添加到当前的 DSM 标准中),可以将两个或更多标准的认可用作在临床实践中定义 AUD 的阈值。此外,我们可以区分至少两种临床严重程度水平,2 到 3 个标准(中度)和 4 个或更多标准(重度)。
使用 DSM-V 中建议的新的 AUD 标准的维度方法可以用于提出阈值和严重程度水平。需要在不同人群和国家进行更多的研究,以进一步证实可用于新的物质使用障碍配方的阈值和切点。