• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

应用转换系数来估算息肉检出率中的腺瘤检出率。

Application of a conversion factor to estimate the adenoma detection rate from the polyp detection rate.

机构信息

Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota 55905, USA.

出版信息

Gastrointest Endosc. 2011 Mar;73(3):493-7. doi: 10.1016/j.gie.2011.01.005.

DOI:10.1016/j.gie.2011.01.005
PMID:21353846
Abstract

BACKGROUND

The adenoma detection rate (ADR) is a quality benchmark for colonoscopy. Many practices find it difficult to determine the ADR because it requires a combination of endoscopic and histologic findings. It may be possible to apply a conversion factor to estimate the ADR from the polyp detection rate (PDR).

OBJECTIVE

To create a conversion factor that can be used to accurately estimate the ADR from the PDR.

DESIGN

This was a retrospective study of colonoscopies performed by board-certified gastroenterologists to determine the average adenoma to polyp detection rate quotient (APDRQ) for all endoscopists, individually and as a group.

SETTING

Academic group practice.

INTERVENTION

The group average APDRQ was used as a conversion factor for the endoscopist's PDR to estimate the ADR.

MAIN OUTCOME MEASUREMENTS

The strength of the relationship between the estimated ADR and the actual ADR determined by Pearson's correlation coefficient.

RESULTS

A total of 3367 colonoscopies performed by 20 staff gastroenterologists were included. The average ADR for all indications, all patient age groups, and both sexes was 0.17 (range 0.09-0.27, standard deviation 0.05). The average APDRQ was 0.64 (range 0.46-1.00, standard deviation 0.13). The correlation between the estimated ADR and the actual ADR was 0.85 (95% CI, 0.65-0.93, P = .000001).

LIMITATIONS

Retrospective study in 1 practice setting with all patient types.

CONCLUSIONS

The use of a conversion factor can accurately estimate the ADR from the PDR. Further study is needed to determine whether such a conversion factor can be applied to different practice settings and patient groups.

摘要

背景

腺瘤检出率(ADR)是结肠镜检查的质量基准。许多实践发现,由于需要结合内镜和组织学发现,确定 ADR 具有一定难度。可能可以应用转换系数,根据息肉检出率(PDR)来估计 ADR。

目的

创建一个转换系数,以便能够根据 PDR 准确估计 ADR。

设计

这是一项对由经委员会认证的胃肠病学家进行的结肠镜检查进行的回顾性研究,目的是确定所有内镜医生的平均腺瘤与息肉检出率比值(APDRQ),分别单独评估和作为一个整体评估。

设置

学术组实践。

干预

将组平均 APDRQ 用作内镜医生 PDR 的转换系数,以估计 ADR。

主要观察指标

通过 Pearson 相关系数确定估计的 ADR 与通过实际 ADR 之间关系的强度。

结果

共纳入 20 名工作人员胃肠病学家进行的 3367 例结肠镜检查。所有适应证、所有患者年龄组和男女的平均 ADR 为 0.17(范围为 0.09-0.27,标准差为 0.05)。平均 APDRQ 为 0.64(范围为 0.46-1.00,标准差为 0.13)。估计的 ADR 与实际 ADR 之间的相关性为 0.85(95%CI,0.65-0.93,P =.000001)。

局限性

在 1 个实践环境中对所有患者类型进行的回顾性研究。

结论

使用转换系数可以根据 PDR 准确估计 ADR。需要进一步研究,以确定这种转换系数是否可以应用于不同的实践环境和患者群体。

相似文献

1
Application of a conversion factor to estimate the adenoma detection rate from the polyp detection rate.应用转换系数来估算息肉检出率中的腺瘤检出率。
Gastrointest Endosc. 2011 Mar;73(3):493-7. doi: 10.1016/j.gie.2011.01.005.
2
Estimation of the Adenoma Detection Rate From the Polyp Detection Rate by Using a Conversion Factor in a Predominantly Hispanic Population.在以西班牙裔为主的人群中,通过使用转换因子从息肉检出率估算腺瘤检出率。
J Clin Gastroenterol. 2015 Aug;49(7):589-93. doi: 10.1097/MCG.0000000000000179.
3
Nonneoplastic polypectomy during screening colonoscopy: the impact on polyp detection rate, adenoma detection rate, and overall cost.筛查结肠镜检查期间的非肿瘤性息肉切除术:对息肉检出率、腺瘤检出率及总体成本的影响
Gastrointest Endosc. 2015 Aug;82(2):370-375.e1. doi: 10.1016/j.gie.2015.01.016. Epub 2015 Apr 3.
4
Polypectomy rate as a quality measure for colonoscopy.息肉切除术率作为结肠镜检查的质量衡量指标。
Gastrointest Endosc. 2011 Mar;73(3):498-506. doi: 10.1016/j.gie.2010.08.008.
5
Effect of simply recording colonoscopy withdrawal time on polyp and adenoma detection rates.单纯记录结肠镜退镜时间对息肉和腺瘤检出率的影响。
Gastrointest Endosc. 2010 Apr;71(4):782-6. doi: 10.1016/j.gie.2009.12.008.
6
Polyp and adenoma detection rates in the proximal and distal colon.近端结肠和远端结肠的息肉和腺瘤检出率。
Am J Gastroenterol. 2013 Jun;108(6):993-9. doi: 10.1038/ajg.2013.68. Epub 2013 Apr 9.
7
The conversion factor for predicting adenoma detection rate from polyp detection rate varies according to colonoscopy indication and patient sex.预测腺瘤检出率的转换因子因结肠镜检查适应证和患者性别而异。
Eur J Cancer Prev. 2020 Jul;29(4):294-302. doi: 10.1097/CEJ.0000000000000558.
8
Measurement of polypectomy rate by using administrative claims data with validation against the adenoma detection rate.使用行政索赔数据测量息肉切除术率,并与腺瘤检出率进行验证。
Gastrointest Endosc. 2013 Mar;77(3):390-4. doi: 10.1016/j.gie.2012.09.032. Epub 2012 Nov 27.
9
A novel method with significant impact on adenoma detection: combined water-exchange and cap-assisted colonoscopy.一种对腺瘤检测具有重大影响的新方法:联合水交换和帽辅助结肠镜检查。
Gastrointest Endosc. 2013 Jun;77(6):944-8. doi: 10.1016/j.gie.2013.01.011. Epub 2013 Mar 6.
10
Serrated polyp detection rate during screening colonoscopy.在筛查结肠镜检查中检测锯齿状息肉的情况。
Colorectal Dis. 2012 Nov;14(11):1323-7. doi: 10.1111/j.1463-1318.2012.03017.x.

引用本文的文献

1
Real-world effectiveness and safety of 1L polyethylene glycol and ascorbic acid for bowel preparation in patients aged 80 years or older.1L聚乙二醇和抗坏血酸用于80岁及以上患者肠道准备的真实世界有效性和安全性。
Endosc Int Open. 2025 Feb 26;13:a25259938. doi: 10.1055/a-2525-9938. eCollection 2025.
2
Adenoma Detection Rate and Polyp Detection Rate among Gastroenterology Fellows and Consultants in a Tertiary Hospital in the Philippines: A Cross-sectional Study.菲律宾一家三级医院胃肠病学住院医师和顾问医师的腺瘤检出率及息肉检出率:一项横断面研究
Acta Med Philipp. 2024 Sep 13;58(16):30-41. doi: 10.47895/amp.vi0.8395. eCollection 2024.
3
Performance comparison between two computer-aided detection colonoscopy models by trainees using different false positive thresholds: a cross-sectional study in Thailand.
泰国的一项横断面研究:学员使用不同假阳性阈值对两种计算机辅助检测结肠镜检查模型的性能比较
Clin Endosc. 2024 Mar;57(2):217-225. doi: 10.5946/ce.2023.145. Epub 2024 Feb 7.
4
Strategies to improve screening colonoscopy quality for the prevention of colorectal cancer.提高结直肠癌预防筛查结肠镜检查质量的策略。
Korean J Intern Med. 2024 Jul;39(4):547-554. doi: 10.3904/kjim.2023.334. Epub 2024 Jan 22.
5
Clinical value of sigmoid colon water exchange colonoscopy: a prospective randomized clinical trial.乙状结肠镜水交换结肠镜检查的临床价值:一项前瞻性随机临床试验。
Sci Rep. 2023 Aug 22;13(1):13704. doi: 10.1038/s41598-023-40706-4.
6
Quality indicators in colonoscopy: observational study in a supplementary health system.结肠镜检查中的质量指标:补充医疗保险体系中的观察性研究。
Acta Cir Bras. 2023 Jan 6;37(11):e371106. doi: 10.1590/acb371106. eCollection 2023.
7
Anesthesia Assistance in Colonoscopy: Impact on Quality Indicators.结肠镜检查中的麻醉辅助:对质量指标的影响。
Front Med (Lausanne). 2022 Jul 12;9:872231. doi: 10.3389/fmed.2022.872231. eCollection 2022.
8
Correlation between Surrogate Quality Indicators for Adenoma Detection Rate and Adenoma Miss Rate in Qualified Colonoscopy, CORE Study: KASID Multicenter Study.合格结肠镜检查中腺瘤检出率和腺瘤漏检率替代质量指标的相关性:KASID 多中心研究。
Gut Liver. 2022 Sep 15;16(5):716-725. doi: 10.5009/gnl210287. Epub 2021 Dec 21.
9
Effect of Using Personal Protective Equipment during the COVID-19 Pandemic on the Quality Indicators of Screening Colonoscopies.2019冠状病毒病大流行期间使用个人防护装备对结肠镜筛查质量指标的影响
Gastroenterol Res Pract. 2021 Jul 27;2021:8910004. doi: 10.1155/2021/8910004. eCollection 2021.
10
Assessment of quality benchmarks in adenoma detection in Mexico.墨西哥腺瘤检测质量基准评估。
Endosc Int Open. 2021 Jun;9(6):E796-E801. doi: 10.1055/a-1396-3718. Epub 2021 May 27.