Digestive Diseases Center, Department of Medicine, Medical University of South Carolina, Charleston, South Carolina, USA.
Gastrointest Endosc. 2010 Apr;71(4):782-6. doi: 10.1016/j.gie.2009.12.008.
According to national recommendations, colonoscopy withdrawal time (WT) on negative screening examinations should average more than 6 minutes because this time is associated with a higher rate of polyp detection. Attempts have been made to increase the WT; however, simply knowing that a quality measure, such as the WT, is being monitored, by itself, may improve the quality of an examination.
To measure changes in the polyp detection rate associated with recording the WT.
Retrospective.
Single tertiary care center.
Patients undergoing colonoscopy within 5 months immediately before (group A) and after (group B) initiation of WT recording. Colonoscopies were excluded if procedure times were incomplete, missing, or nonsensical.
Polyp detection, compared by using the chi(2) test and logistic regression multivariate analyses; pathology manually reviewed from a sample of 200 consecutive polyp cases (100 per group).
The average WT in group B was 14.5 minutes (11.0 minutes in negative screening examinations). In group A, polyps were detected in 530 (37.7%) of 1405 colonoscopies compared with 571 (41.2%) of 1387 colonoscopies in group B (difference 3.5%; 95% CI, -0.2% to 7.1%), a nonsignificant 9.3% relative increase. Longer procedure time, age, sex, and indication were significant predictors; monitoring the WT was not. Nonsignificantly, more polyp examinations in group B found all nonadenomas compared with group A (36% vs 27%; P = .17), and polyps were nonsignificantly smaller (P = .30).
Retrospective database data, pathology performed only on a subsample.
WT recording was associated with a nonsignificant increase in polyp detection, but this was likely attributable to a slight increase in the detection of (smaller) nonadenomatous polyps.
根据国家建议,阴性筛查检查的结肠镜检查退出时间(WT)应平均超过 6 分钟,因为这段时间与更高的息肉检出率相关。已经尝试增加 WT;然而,仅知道正在监测质量指标(如 WT)本身就可以提高检查的质量。
测量与记录 WT 相关的息肉检出率变化。
回顾性。
单一的三级护理中心。
在开始记录 WT 之前(A 组)和之后(B 组)的 5 个月内接受结肠镜检查的患者。如果程序时间不完整、缺失或不合理,则排除结肠镜检查。
使用卡方检验和逻辑回归多变量分析比较息肉检出率;从 200 例连续息肉病例中(每组 100 例)手动复查病理。
B 组的平均 WT 为 14.5 分钟(阴性筛查检查为 11.0 分钟)。在 A 组中,1405 例结肠镜检查中检出息肉 530 例(37.7%),而 B 组 1387 例结肠镜检查中检出息肉 571 例(41.2%)(差异 3.5%;95%CI,-0.2%至 7.1%),相对增加 9.3%,但无统计学意义。较长的手术时间、年龄、性别和指征是显著的预测因素;监测 WT 不是。B 组中略多的息肉检查发现所有非腺瘤(36%对 27%;P =.17),息肉也略小(P =.30),但差异无统计学意义。
回顾性数据库数据,仅对亚组进行病理检查。
WT 记录与息肉检出率的轻微但无统计学意义的增加相关,但这可能归因于(较小)非腺瘤性息肉的检出略有增加。