Center for Computational Imaging and Simulation Technologies in Biomedicine, Universitat Pompeu Fabra and Networking Biomedical Research Center on Bioengineering, Biomaterials and Nanomedicine, Barcelona 08018, Spain.
Med Phys. 2011 Jan;38(1):210-22. doi: 10.1118/1.3515749.
To evaluate the suitability of an improved version of an automatic segmentation method based on geodesic active regions (GAR) for segmenting cerebral vasculature with aneurysms from 3D x-ray reconstruction angiography (3DRA) and time of flight magnetic resonance angiography (TOF-MRA) images available in the clinical routine.
Three aspects of the GAR method have been improved: execution time, robustness to variability in imaging protocols, and robustness to variability in image spatial resolutions. The improved GAR was retrospectively evaluated on images from patients containing intracranial aneurysms in the area of the Circle of Willis and imaged with two modalities: 3DRA and TOF-MRA. Images were obtained from two clinical centers, each using different imaging equipment. Evaluation included qualitative and quantitative analyses of the segmentation results on 20 images from 10 patients. The gold standard was built from 660 cross-sections (33 per image) of vessels and aneurysms, manually measured by interventional neuroradiologists. GAR has also been compared to an interactive segmentation method: isointensity surface extraction (ISE). In addition, since patients had been imaged with the two modalities, we performed an intermodality agreement analysis with respect to both the manual measurements and each of the two segmentation methods.
Both GAR and ISE differed from the gold standard within acceptable limits compared to the imaging resolution. GAR (ISE) had an average accuracy of 0.20 (0.24) mm for 3DRA and 0.27 (0.30) mm for TOF-MRA, and had a repeatability of 0.05 (0.20) mm. Compared to ISE, GAR had a lower qualitative error in the vessel region and a lower quantitative error in the aneurysm region. The repeatability of GAR was superior to manual measurements and ISE. The intermodality agreement was similar between GAR and the manual measurements.
The improved GAR method outperformed ISE qualitatively as well as quantitatively and is suitable for segmenting 3DRA and TOF-MRA images from clinical routine.
评估一种基于测地线活动区域(GAR)的自动分割方法的改进版本,用于从临床常规中可用的 3D X 射线重建血管造影(3DRA)和时飞磁共振血管造影(TOF-MRA)图像中分割出带有动脉瘤的脑血管。
改进了 GAR 方法的三个方面:执行时间、对成像协议变化的鲁棒性以及对图像空间分辨率变化的鲁棒性。改进的 GAR 对来自颅内动脉瘤的 Willis 环区域的患者图像进行了回顾性评估,使用两种模态进行成像:3DRA 和 TOF-MRA。图像来自两个临床中心,每个中心使用不同的成像设备。评估包括对来自 10 名患者的 20 张图像的分割结果进行定性和定量分析。金标准是由介入神经放射科医生手动测量的 660 个血管和动脉瘤的横截面(每张图像 33 个)构建的。GAR 还与交互式分割方法进行了比较:等灰度表面提取(ISE)。此外,由于患者已经用两种方式进行了成像,因此我们针对手动测量值以及两种分割方法中的每一种,进行了跨模态一致性分析。
与成像分辨率相比,GAR 和 ISE 与金标准的差异均在可接受范围内。GAR(ISE)对 3DRA 的平均准确性为 0.20(0.24)mm,对 TOF-MRA 的平均准确性为 0.27(0.30)mm,重复性为 0.05(0.20)mm。与 ISE 相比,GAR 在血管区域的定性误差较小,在动脉瘤区域的定量误差较小。GAR 的重复性优于手动测量值和 ISE。GAR 的跨模态一致性与手动测量值相似。
改进后的 GAR 方法在定性和定量上均优于 ISE,适用于从临床常规中分割 3DRA 和 TOF-MRA 图像。