Palliative Care Consultation Service, Division of General Internal Medicine, Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center and Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts, USA.
Cancer. 2011 Sep 15;117(18):4304-11. doi: 10.1002/cncr.25952. Epub 2011 Mar 1.
Palliative care is recognized as integral to the practice of oncology, yet many oncologists report inadequate training in critical palliative care domains, such as symptom management, psychosocial care, and communication skills. The authors of this report sought to assess the quantity and quality of palliative care education within oncology fellowships.
Second-year oncology fellows completed a 104-item survey that was modified and adapted from a national survey of medical students and residents. Items allowed comparison between palliative care and nonpalliative care topics.
Of 402 eligible fellows, 63.2% responded (n = 254). Respondents were: 52% men, 62% Caucasian, and 64% US medical school graduates. Twenty-six percent had completed a palliative care rotation. Fellows rated the overall quality of fellowship teaching more highly than teaching on palliative care (3.7 v 3.0 on a 1-5 scale; t = 10.2; P < .001). Rates of being observed (81%) and receiving feedback (80%) on an end-of-life communication skill were high. Psychosocial needs of patients received some attention: Fifty-seven percent of fellows reported that they were conveyed as a core competency, but only 32% of fellows received explicit education on assessing and managing depression at the end of life. Fellows rarely reported receiving explicit education on opioid rotation (33%). Fellows scored a median of 2 of 4 items that tested basic palliative care knowledge, and only 23% correctly performed an opioid conversion.
Fellows rated the quality of palliative care education as inferior to overall oncology training and may benefit from more teaching on pain management, psychosocial care, and communication skills.
姑息治疗被认为是肿瘤学实践的一个组成部分,但许多肿瘤学家报告说,他们在关键的姑息治疗领域(如症状管理、心理社会护理和沟通技巧)的培训不足。本报告的作者试图评估肿瘤学住院医师培训中的姑息治疗教育的数量和质量。
第二年的肿瘤学住院医师完成了一项 104 项的调查,该调查是从一项针对医学生和住院医师的全国性调查中修改和改编而来的。这些项目允许在姑息治疗和非姑息治疗主题之间进行比较。
在 402 名符合条件的住院医师中,有 63.2%(n = 254)做出了回应。应答者的情况为:52%为男性,62%为白种人,64%为美国医学院的毕业生。26%的人完成了姑息治疗轮转。住院医师对住院医师培训的整体教学质量的评价高于姑息治疗(1-5 分制的 3.7 分对 3.0 分;t = 10.2;P <.001)。关于结束生命的沟通技巧,被观察(81%)和收到反馈(80%)的比例很高。患者的心理社会需求也受到了一定的关注:57%的住院医师报告说,他们将这些需求作为核心能力,但只有 32%的住院医师接受了关于在生命结束时评估和管理抑郁的明确教育。住院医师很少报告接受过关于阿片类药物轮转的明确教育(33%)。住院医师在测试基本姑息治疗知识的 4 项中的 2 项中得分中位数为 2 分,只有 23%的人正确进行了阿片类药物转换。
住院医师认为姑息治疗教育的质量不如整体肿瘤学培训,他们可能需要更多关于疼痛管理、心理社会护理和沟通技巧的教学。