• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

默认效应易感性不因年龄而异。

Susceptibility to default effects does not differ by age.

机构信息

Department of Psychology, Cornell University.

出版信息

J Exp Psychol Gen. 2023 Apr;152(4):1175-1187. doi: 10.1037/xge0001317. Epub 2022 Nov 10.

DOI:10.1037/xge0001317
PMID:36355772
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC10169537/
Abstract

Decision makers are more likely to passively accept than to actively reject preselected default options. Age differences in such "default effects" have not been systematically examined, but prior research reports age-related variation in several known determinants of default effects suggesting that they may be more common in older as compared to younger adults. To address this question, a representative life span sample ( = 500; = 49.90, = 19.34; 51% female, 49% male; 67% non-Hispanic White) responded to a preregistered online study. Participants completed a default effect task comprising two conditions, one requiring opt-out and one requiring opt-in decisions (i.e., 15 vs. 0 preselected features each). Susceptibility to defaults was assessed as the discrepancy between the number of features selected within each condition. In addition, we collected data on known determinants of default effects (i.e., perceived endowment, endorsement, ease, experience making similar choices, importance of the choice, and affective responses to the choice). Finally, we screened demographic background, personality, socioemotional and health status, and cognitive ability. Susceptibility to default effects was evident both at the individual and the group level. Unlike hypothesized, older age did not predict greater susceptibility to defaults, and older adults were less likely to endorse determinants of default effect compliance. Of the covariates assessed, only identifying as non-Hispanic White, greater perceived endorsement, greater perceived ease, and lower perceived importance of making the right choice predicted decision makers' susceptibility to default effects. Thus, our findings suggest that susceptibility to decision defaults does not vary by age. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2023 APA, all rights reserved).

摘要

决策者更倾向于被动接受而不是主动拒绝预先选定的默认选项。但对于这种“默认效应”的年龄差异,尚未进行系统研究,不过先前的研究报告显示,默认效应的几个已知决定因素存在与年龄相关的变化,这表明默认效应在老年人中比在年轻人中更为常见。为了解决这个问题,一项代表性的全生命周期样本(n=500;年龄:49.90,标准差:19.34;51%女性,49%男性;67%非西班牙裔白人)参与了一项预先注册的在线研究。参与者完成了一个默认效应任务,该任务包括两个条件,一个需要选择退出,一个需要选择加入决策(即每个条件下预先选择 15 个与 0 个特征)。默认效应的易感性评估为每个条件下选择的特征数量差异。此外,我们还收集了默认效应的已知决定因素(即感知赋予、认可、易用性、类似选择经验、选择的重要性和对选择的情感反应)的数据。最后,我们筛选了人口统计学背景、个性、社会情感和健康状况以及认知能力。在个体和群体层面都明显存在对默认效应的易感性。与假设相反,年龄较大并不预示着更容易受到默认的影响,老年人更不可能认可默认效应遵守的决定因素。在所评估的协变量中,只有认定为非西班牙裔白人、更大的感知认可、更大的感知易用性以及更低的做出正确选择的重要性预测了决策者对默认效应的易感性。因此,我们的研究结果表明,对决策默认的易感性不因年龄而异。

相似文献

1
Susceptibility to default effects does not differ by age.默认效应易感性不因年龄而异。
J Exp Psychol Gen. 2023 Apr;152(4):1175-1187. doi: 10.1037/xge0001317. Epub 2022 Nov 10.
2
Reason Defaults: Presenting Defaults With Reasons for Choosing Each Option Helps Decision-Makers With Minority Interests.默认理由:呈现带有选择每个选项理由的默认值有助于具有少数群体利益的决策者。
Psychol Sci. 2023 Dec;34(12):1363-1376. doi: 10.1177/09567976231198184. Epub 2023 Nov 6.
3
Folic acid supplementation and malaria susceptibility and severity among people taking antifolate antimalarial drugs in endemic areas.在流行地区,服用抗叶酸抗疟药物的人群中,叶酸补充剂与疟疾易感性和严重程度的关系。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2022 Feb 1;2(2022):CD014217. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD014217.
4
Better medicine by default.默认情况下提供更好的医疗服务。
Med Decis Making. 2014 Feb;34(2):147-58. doi: 10.1177/0272989X13507339. Epub 2013 Oct 14.
5
The application of defaults to optimize parents' health-based choices for children.应用默认设置来优化父母基于健康的儿童选择。
Appetite. 2017 Jun 1;113:368-375. doi: 10.1016/j.appet.2017.02.039. Epub 2017 Feb 28.
6
Financial Surrogate Decision Making: Lessons from Applied Experimental Philosophy.财务代理决策:应用实验哲学的经验教训。
Span J Psychol. 2016 Sep 20;19:E56. doi: 10.1017/sjp.2016.54.
7
Beyond the ticked box: organ donation decision-making under different registration systems.超越勾选框:不同登记制度下的器官捐赠决策。
Psychol Health. 2021 May;36(5):511-528. doi: 10.1080/08870446.2020.1811867. Epub 2020 Aug 26.
8
Default options and neonatal resuscitation decisions.默认选项和新生儿复苏决策。
J Med Ethics. 2012 Dec;38(12):713-8. doi: 10.1136/medethics-2011-100182.
9
The joint effect of framing and defaults on choice behavior.框架效应和默认选项对选择行为的共同影响。
Psychol Res. 2023 Jun;87(4):1114-1128. doi: 10.1007/s00426-022-01726-3. Epub 2022 Sep 5.
10
Underlying wishes and nudged choices.潜在愿望与引导性选择。
J Exp Psychol Appl. 2018 Dec;24(4):459-475. doi: 10.1037/xap0000183. Epub 2018 Aug 16.

引用本文的文献

1
Information Avoidance in Consumer Choice: Do Avoidance Tendencies and Motives Vary by Age?消费者选择中的信息回避:回避倾向和动机是否随年龄而异?
Exp Aging Res. 2023 Mar-Apr;49(2):112-129. doi: 10.1080/0361073X.2022.2051967. Epub 2022 Mar 20.

本文引用的文献

1
Information Avoidance in Consumer Choice: Do Avoidance Tendencies and Motives Vary by Age?消费者选择中的信息回避:回避倾向和动机是否随年龄而异?
Exp Aging Res. 2023 Mar-Apr;49(2):112-129. doi: 10.1080/0361073X.2022.2051967. Epub 2022 Mar 20.
2
The influence of verbatim versus gist formatting on younger and older adults' information acquisition and decision-making.逐字记录与要点概括格式对年轻人和老年人信息获取及决策的影响。
Psychol Aging. 2022 Mar;37(2):197-209. doi: 10.1037/pag0000676. Epub 2022 Jan 27.
3
Is Reliance on the Affect Heuristic Associated With Age?对情感启发式的依赖与年龄有关吗?
J Gerontol B Psychol Sci Soc Sci. 2022 Mar 3;77(3):482-492. doi: 10.1093/geronb/gbab126.
4
Age Differences in Media Consumption and Avoidance With Respect to COVID-19.年龄差异与新冠疫情期间的媒体接触和回避
J Gerontol B Psychol Sci Soc Sci. 2022 Apr 1;77(4):e76-e82. doi: 10.1093/geronb/gbab123.
5
Age differences in deliberate ignorance.故意忽视的年龄差异。
Psychol Aging. 2021 Jun;36(4):407-414. doi: 10.1037/pag0000603. Epub 2021 Apr 29.
6
Age Differences in Stress, Life Changes, and Social Ties During the COVID-19 Pandemic: Implications for Psychological Well-Being.新冠疫情期间压力、生活变化和社会关系的年龄差异:对心理健康的影响。
Gerontologist. 2021 Feb 23;61(2):205-216. doi: 10.1093/geront/gnaa204.
7
Age Differences in COVID-19 Risk Perceptions and Mental Health: Evidence From a National U.S. Survey Conducted in March 2020.新冠疫情期间的风险认知和心理健康的年龄差异:来自 2020 年 3 月美国全国性调查的证据。
J Gerontol B Psychol Sci Soc Sci. 2021 Jan 18;76(2):e24-e29. doi: 10.1093/geronb/gbaa074.
8
Age differences in risk attitude are shaped by option complexity.风险态度的年龄差异受选项复杂性的影响。
J Exp Psychol Gen. 2020 Sep;149(9):1644-1683. doi: 10.1037/xge0000741. Epub 2020 Feb 6.
9
Strive to Win or Not to Lose? Age-Related Differences in Framing Effects on Effort-Based Decision-Making.力争胜利还是避免失败?基于努力的决策制定中框架效应的年龄差异。
J Gerontol B Psychol Sci Soc Sci. 2020 Nov 13;75(10):2095-2105. doi: 10.1093/geronb/gbz136.
10
Psychometric Evaluation of the BFI-10 and the NEO-FFI-3 in Indian Adolescents.BFI-10和NEO-FFI-3在印度青少年中的心理测量评估。
Front Psychol. 2019 May 9;10:1057. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2019.01057. eCollection 2019.