Gould K L, Kirkeeide R L, Buchi M
Department of Medicine, University of Texas Health Science Center, Houston 77225.
J Am Coll Cardiol. 1990 Feb;15(2):459-74. doi: 10.1016/s0735-1097(10)80078-6.
Coronary flow reserve indicates functional stenosis severity, but may be altered by physiologic conditions unrelated to stenosis geometry. To assess the effects of changing physiologic conditions on coronary flow reserve, aortic pressure and heart rate-blood pressure (rate-pressure) product were altered by phenylephrine and nitroprusside in 11 dogs. There was a total of 366 measurements, 26 without and 340 with acute stenoses of the left circumflex artery by a calibrated stenoser, providing percent area stenosis with flow reserve measured by flow meter after the administration of intracoronary adenosine. Absolute coronary flow reserve (maximal flow/rest flow) with no stenosis was 5.9 +/- 1.5 (1 SD) at control study, 7.0 +/- 2.2 after phenylephrine and 4.6 +/- 2.0 after nitroprusside, ranging from 2.0 to 12.1 depending on aortic pressure and rate-pressure product. However, relative coronary flow reserve (maximal flow with stenosis/normal maximal flow without stenosis) was independent of aortic pressure and rate-pressure product. Over the range of aortic pressures and rate-pressure products, the size of 1 SD expressed as a percent of mean absolute coronary flow reserve was +/- 43% without stenosis, and for each category of stenosis severity from 0 to 100% narrowing, it averaged +/- 45% compared with +/- 17% for relative coronary flow reserve. For example, for a 65% stenosis, absolute flow reserve was 5.2 +/- 1.7 (+/- 33% variation), whereas relative flow reserve was 0.9 +/- 0.09 (+/- 10% variation), where 1.0 is normal. Therefore, absolute coronary flow reserve by flow meter was highly variable for fixed stenoses depending on aortic pressure and rate-pressure product, whereas relative flow reserve more accurately and specifically described stenosis severity independent of physiologic conditions. Together, absolute and relative coronary flow reserve provide a more complete description of physiologic stenosis severity than either does alone. PART II: Coronary flow reserve directly measured by a flow meter is altered not only by stenosis, but also by physiologic variables. Stenosis flow reserve is derived from length, percent stenosis, absolute diameters and shape by quantitative coronary arteriography using standardized physiologic conditions. To study the relative merits of absolute coronary flow reserve measured by flow meter and stenosis flow reserve determined by quantitative coronary arteriography for assessing stenosis severity, aortic pressure and rate-pressure product were altered by phenylephrine and nitroprusside in 11 dogs, with 366 stenoses of the left circumflex artery by a calibrated stenoser providing percent area stenosis as described in Part I.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 400 WORDS)
冠状动脉血流储备可指示功能性狭窄的严重程度,但可能会受到与狭窄几何形状无关的生理状况的影响。为了评估生理状况变化对冠状动脉血流储备的影响,在11只犬中使用去氧肾上腺素和硝普钠改变主动脉压力和心率-血压(率压)乘积。总共进行了366次测量,其中26次无左回旋支急性狭窄,340次有左回旋支急性狭窄,通过校准的狭窄器造成狭窄,在冠状动脉内注射腺苷后用流量计测量狭窄面积百分比及血流储备。在对照研究中,无狭窄时的绝对冠状动脉血流储备(最大血流/静息血流)为5.9±1.5(1个标准差),去氧肾上腺素后为7.0±2.2,硝普钠后为4.6±2.0,根据主动脉压力和率压乘积,范围在2.0至12.1之间。然而,相对冠状动脉血流储备(有狭窄时的最大血流/无狭窄时的正常最大血流)与主动脉压力和率压乘积无关。在主动脉压力和率压乘积的范围内,以平均绝对冠状动脉血流储备的百分比表示的1个标准差大小,无狭窄时为±43%,对于从0至100%狭窄的每一类狭窄严重程度,平均为±45%,而相对冠状动脉血流储备为±17%。例如,对于65%的狭窄,绝对血流储备为5.2±1.7(±33%变化),而相对血流储备为0.9±0.09(±10%变化),其中1.0为正常。因此,对于固定狭窄,通过流量计测量的绝对冠状动脉血流储备因主动脉压力和率压乘积而高度可变,而相对血流储备更准确、更具体地描述了独立于生理状况的狭窄严重程度。绝对和相对冠状动脉血流储备共同提供了比单独任何一个更完整的生理狭窄严重程度描述。第二部分:通过流量计直接测量的冠状动脉血流储备不仅会因狭窄而改变,还会因生理变量而改变。狭窄血流储备是在标准化生理状况下通过定量冠状动脉造影从长度、狭窄百分比、绝对直径和形状推导得出的。为了研究通过流量计测量的绝对冠状动脉血流储备和通过定量冠状动脉造影确定的狭窄血流储备在评估狭窄严重程度方面的相对优点,在11只犬中使用去氧肾上腺素和硝普钠改变主动脉压力和率压乘积,如第一部分所述,对左回旋支进行了366次狭窄。(摘要截断于400字)