• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

关爱伦理与职业角色。

Ethics of caring and professional roles.

机构信息

Centre for Medical Ethics, University of Oslo, PO Box 1130, Blindern, NO-0318 Oslo, Norway.

出版信息

Nurs Ethics. 2011 Mar;18(2):201-8. doi: 10.1177/0969733010392302.

DOI:10.1177/0969733010392302
PMID:21372233
Abstract

Normative discussions about modern health care often revolve around principles stating what must not be done or how to ration scarce resources in the name of justice. These are important discussions. However, in order to have an impact on clinical roles, ethical reflection must be able to describe and address the complexities and challenges of modern nursing and doctoring, and maybe even the patient role. A multi-principled approach, such as the one suggested by Beauchamp and Childress, can obviously address almost any such issue, but a great deal of translation is often required in order to address role-related issues. I shall here argue that an ethics of caring is better suited to grasping the big picture when the question is how to create value-informed clinical roles in an era of rapid development.

摘要

规范性讨论现代医疗保健往往围绕着原则展开,这些原则规定了什么是不能做的,或者如何以正义的名义分配稀缺资源。这些讨论很重要。然而,为了对临床角色产生影响,伦理反思必须能够描述和解决现代护理和医疗的复杂性和挑战,甚至可能是患者角色。一种多原则方法,如 Beauchamp 和 Childress 所建议的那样,显然可以解决几乎任何此类问题,但为了解决与角色相关的问题,通常需要大量的翻译。我在这里主张,当问题是如何在快速发展的时代创建有价值意识的临床角色时,关怀伦理更适合把握大局。

相似文献

1
Ethics of caring and professional roles.关爱伦理与职业角色。
Nurs Ethics. 2011 Mar;18(2):201-8. doi: 10.1177/0969733010392302.
2
Mature care in professional relationships and health care prioritizations.专业关系中的成熟关怀和医疗保健优先级。
Nurs Ethics. 2011 Mar;18(2):209-16. doi: 10.1177/0969733010389257.
3
Mature care and reciprocity: two cases from acute psychiatry.成熟的关怀与互惠:来自急性精神病学的两个案例。
Nurs Ethics. 2011 Mar;18(2):217-31. doi: 10.1177/0969733010392301.
4
Comment.评论。
Nurs Ethics. 2011 Mar;18(2):255-7. doi: 10.1177/0969733010395673.
5
Harm in the absence of care: Towards a medical ethics that cares.无心之过亦成害:走向关怀的医学伦理学。
Nurs Ethics. 2011 Mar;18(2):174-83. doi: 10.1177/0969733010392304.
6
The place of care in ethical theory.伦理理论中的照护场所
J Med Philos. 1998 Apr;23(2):210-24. doi: 10.1076/jmep.23.2.210.8925.
7
The ethics of care: role obligations and moderate partiality in health care.关怀伦理:医疗保健中的角色义务与适度偏爱。
Nurs Ethics. 2011 Mar;18(2):192-200. doi: 10.1177/0969733010388926.
8
Impartial principle and moral context: securing a place for the particular in ethical theory.公正原则与道德情境:在伦理理论中为特殊性争取一席之地
J Med Philos. 1998 Apr;23(2):153-69. doi: 10.1076/jmep.23.2.153.8923.
9
Care transformations: attentiveness, professional ethics and thoughts towards differentiation.护理转变:专注、职业道德与差异化思考
Nurs Ethics. 2011 Mar;18(2):258-61. doi: 10.1177/0969733010396818.
10
A personalist approach to care ethics.关怀伦理的人格主义进路。
Nurs Ethics. 2011 Mar;18(2):161-73. doi: 10.1177/0969733010388924.

引用本文的文献

1
Relational autonomy in informed consent (RAIC) as an ethics of care approach to the concept of informed consent.知情同意中的关系自主性(RAIC)作为一种对知情同意概念的关怀伦理方法。
Med Health Care Philos. 2018 Mar;21(1):101-111. doi: 10.1007/s11019-017-9789-7.