Faculty of Social and Life Sciences, Department of Nursing, Karlstad University, SE-651 88 Karlstad, Sweden.
Accid Anal Prev. 2011 May;43(3):818-22. doi: 10.1016/j.aap.2010.10.032. Epub 2010 Dec 9.
Transportation with road ambulances is increasing because of a concentration of hospitals to larger units, with high quality in the acute care of the patients. The concentration implies longer distances to receiving units, which increases the transportation time. The purpose of the present study was to investigate the time difference in ambulance transportation with high speed emergency driving, compared to non-emergency driving in normal traffic pace. Data was collected from 30 emergency high speed ambulance transportations in urban and rural areas. These transportations were then repeated experimentally with an ambulance driving at normal traffic pace. The average speed and duration for the emergency transportations were shorter than for the experimental driving, both in urban and rural areas. The mean time saved was 2.9 min (urban areas) and 8.9 min (rural areas). Regardless of the patient's clinical status or need of care the emergency transportations were carried out in higher speed than the experimental driving. However, patients with life threatening conditions were not included in this study. Procedures and methods should be developed to identify the patients for which fast transportation has clinical relevance to the outcomes.
由于医院集中到更大的单位,提供高质量的急性患者护理,道路救护车的转运量正在增加。集中化意味着接收单位的距离增加,从而增加了转运时间。本研究的目的是调查高速紧急驾驶与正常交通速度下非紧急驾驶相比,救护车转运的时间差异。数据来自 30 例城乡地区的紧急高速救护车转运。然后,用一辆在正常交通速度下行驶的救护车对这些转运进行了实验性重复。无论是在城市还是农村地区,紧急转运的平均速度和持续时间都比实验驾驶短。节省的平均时间为 2.9 分钟(城市地区)和 8.9 分钟(农村地区)。无论患者的临床状况或护理需求如何,紧急转运的速度都高于实验驾驶。然而,本研究并未纳入有生命威胁的患者。应制定程序和方法,以确定对临床结局有快速转运相关性的患者。