• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

美敦力 Sprint Fidelis 导联召回:确定医疗保险最初 5 年的管理成本。

Medtronic Sprint Fidelis lead recall: determining the initial 5-year management cost to Medicare.

机构信息

Heart Rhythm Center in the Section of Cardiology, Department of Internal Medicine, University of Chicago, Chicago, Illinois, USA.

出版信息

Heart Rhythm. 2011 Aug;8(8):1192-7. doi: 10.1016/j.hrthm.2011.02.039. Epub 2011 Mar 3.

DOI:10.1016/j.hrthm.2011.02.039
PMID:21377552
Abstract

BACKGROUND

The Medtronic Sprint Fidelis defibrillator lead has a high failure rate and was recalled in October 2007.

OBJECTIVE

The purpose of this study was to determine the incremental cost of the management of this lead to Medicare.

METHODS

Real hospital cost data in U.S. dollars were collected on 32 patients with a Medtronic Sprint Fidelis lead who underwent lead revision. Of these patients, 15 were excluded because they had insurance coverage other than that provided by the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services. Seventeen patients with Medicare or Medicaid coverage underwent lead revision either electively (n = 6) or after being hospitalized for multiple shocks caused by a lead fracture (n = 11). Eighty-eight percent of the patients underwent extraction of the Fidelis lead at the time of lead revision. A decision model was made that outlines the potential management of the lead recall over time. The existing literature and Medtronic data were reviewed for parameters included in the decision model. The model assumed that 175,000 patients were alive with an implanted Fidelis lead at the time of the recall and that the annual failure rate will be 1.8% over the first 5 years. It was also assumed that 1% of patients without a lead fracture would also undergo elective lead revision each year and that the proportion of patients who would have the Fidelis lead extracted rather than abandoned would be 20:80. Estimates with ranges were used for parameters for which no data are available. The industry standard rate of lead failure was estimated based on the Sprint Quattro model 6947 lead, and this was subtracted from the estimated rates for the Sprint Fidelis lead such that the incremental cost of the lead failure could be estimated.

RESULTS

The cost of lead revision trended higher when the Fidelis lead was extracted rather than abandoned ($45,077 ± $11,693 vs $33,802 ± $33, P = .20). In 5 years, the estimated cost impact of the Medtronic Sprint Fidelis lead recall to Medicare will be $287,000,000 (range $176,000,000-$1,186,000,000, October 2007 USD).

CONCLUSION

The cost impact of managing a defibrillator lead with a high failure rate to Medicare will be substantial.

摘要

背景

美敦力 Sprint Fidelis 除颤器导联的故障率很高,并于 2007 年 10 月召回。

目的

本研究旨在确定管理 Medicare 中该导联的增量成本。

方法

以 32 名接受导联修正的美敦力 Sprint Fidelis 导联患者的实际医院成本数据为基础,以美元为单位进行收集。其中 15 名患者因保险范围与医疗保险和医疗补助服务中心提供的范围不同而被排除在外。17 名有医疗保险或医疗补助的患者因导联断裂导致多次电击而住院(n = 11)或选择(n = 6)进行导联修正。88%的患者在导联修正时同时进行 Fidelis 导联的提取。制作了一个决策模型,概述了随时间推移对导联召回的潜在管理。审查了现有文献和美敦力的数据,以确定决策模型中包含的参数。该模型假设在召回时,有 175,000 名患者植入 Fidelis 导联且在前 5 年内,每年的故障率将为 1.8%。还假设每年无导联断裂的 1%患者将接受选择性导联修正,且提取而非废弃 Fidelis 导联的患者比例将为 20:80。对于尚无数据的参数,使用了带有范围的估计值。根据 Sprint Quattro 模型 6947 导联,估计行业标准的导联故障率,并从 Sprint Fidelis 导联的估计率中减去,从而可以估计导联故障的增量成本。

结果

当 Fidelis 导联被提取而非废弃时,导联修正的成本呈上升趋势($45,077 ± $11,693 比 $33,802 ± $33,P =.20)。在 5 年内,美敦力 Sprint Fidelis 导联召回对 Medicare 的估计成本影响将为 287,000,000 美元(2007 年 10 月美元,范围为 176,000,000 美元至 1,186,000,000 美元)。

结论

管理 Medicare 中高故障率的除颤器导联的成本影响将是巨大的。

相似文献

1
Medtronic Sprint Fidelis lead recall: determining the initial 5-year management cost to Medicare.美敦力 Sprint Fidelis 导联召回:确定医疗保险最初 5 年的管理成本。
Heart Rhythm. 2011 Aug;8(8):1192-7. doi: 10.1016/j.hrthm.2011.02.039. Epub 2011 Mar 3.
2
A cost-effectiveness analysis of a proactive management strategy for the Sprint Fidelis recall: a probabilistic decision analysis model.主动管理策略对 Sprint Fidelis 召回的成本效益分析:概率决策分析模型。
Heart Rhythm. 2013 Dec;10(12):1761-7. doi: 10.1016/j.hrthm.2013.09.067. Epub 2013 Sep 25.
3
Increasing hazard of Sprint Fidelis implantable cardioverter-defibrillator lead failure.美敦力 Sprint Fidelis植入式心脏复律除颤器导线故障风险增加。
Heart Rhythm. 2009 May;6(5):605-10. doi: 10.1016/j.hrthm.2009.02.024. Epub 2009 Feb 20.
4
Lead integrity alert algorithm decreases inappropriate shocks in patients who have Sprint Fidelis pace-sense conductor fractures.导联完整性警示算法可降低 Sprint Fidelis 起搏感知导线断裂患者中不适当电击的发生率。
Heart Rhythm. 2010 Aug;7(8):1048-55. doi: 10.1016/j.hrthm.2010.05.015. Epub 2010 May 21.
5
Impact of implanted recalled sprint Fidelis lead on patient mortality.植入召回的 Sprint Fidelis 导联对患者死亡率的影响。
J Am Coll Cardiol. 2011 Jul 12;58(3):278-83. doi: 10.1016/j.jacc.2011.03.027.
6
Lead electrical parameters may not predict integrity of the Sprint Fidelis ICD lead.主导电参数可能无法预测 Sprint Fidelis ICD 导联的完整性。
Heart Rhythm. 2012 Sep;9(9):1446-51. doi: 10.1016/j.hrthm.2012.04.033. Epub 2012 Apr 24.
7
Class I recall of defibrillator leads: a comparison of the Sprint Fidelis and Riata families.I 类除颤器导线召回:Sprint Fidelis 和 Riata 家族的比较。
Heart Rhythm. 2012 Aug;9(8):1251-5. doi: 10.1016/j.hrthm.2012.04.003. Epub 2012 Apr 3.
8
Comparison of longevity and clinical outcomes of implantable cardioverter-defibrillator leads among manufacturers.比较不同制造商生产的植入式心脏复律除颤器导线的寿命和临床结果。
Heart Rhythm. 2017 Oct;14(10):1496-1503. doi: 10.1016/j.hrthm.2017.05.020. Epub 2017 May 11.
9
Risk of Sprint Fidelis defibrillator lead failure is highly dependent on age.Sprint Fidelis 除颤器导联故障的风险高度依赖于年龄。
Arch Cardiovasc Dis. 2011 Jun-Jul;104(6-7):388-95. doi: 10.1016/j.acvd.2011.05.002. Epub 2011 Jul 8.
10
Comparison of Sprint Fidelis and Riata defibrillator lead failure rates.Sprint Fidelis 与 Riata 除颤器导联故障发生率比较。
Int J Cardiol. 2013 Sep 30;168(2):848-52. doi: 10.1016/j.ijcard.2012.10.015. Epub 2012 Nov 6.

引用本文的文献

1
Recalls of cardiac implants in the last decade: what lessons can we learn?过去十年中心脏植入物的召回事件:我们能吸取哪些教训?
PLoS One. 2015 May 11;10(5):e0125987. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0125987. eCollection 2015.
2
Managing patients with advisory defibrillator leads: what can we learn from published data?管理带有建议性除颤器导线的患者:我们能从已发表的数据中学到什么?
Neth Heart J. 2015 Apr;23(4):199-204. doi: 10.1007/s12471-015-0669-6.