• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

基于 GRAPPA 的并行成像重建和采集参数对图像质量的影响。

The effect of reconstruction and acquisition parameters for GRAPPA-based parallel imaging on the image quality.

机构信息

Department of Radiology, Medical Physics, University Hospital Freiburg, Freiburg, Germany.

出版信息

Magn Reson Med. 2011 Aug;66(2):402-9. doi: 10.1002/mrm.22803. Epub 2011 Mar 4.

DOI:10.1002/mrm.22803
PMID:21381100
Abstract

Parallel imaging based on generalized autocalibrating partially parallel acquisitions is widely used in the clinical routine. To date, no detailed analysis has been presented describing the dependence of the image quality on the reconstruction and acquisition parameters such as the number of autocalibration signal (ACS) lines NACS, the reconstruction kernel size (bx×by), and the undersampling factor R. To evaluate their influence on the performance of generalized autocalibrating partially parallel acquisitions, two phantom data sets acquired with 12-channel and 32-channel receive coils and three in vivo measurements were analyzed. Reconstruction parameters were systematically varied between R=2-4, NACS=4-64, bx=1-9, and by=2-10 to characterize their influence on image quality and noise. A main aspect of the analysis was to optimize the parameter set with respect to the effectively achieved net image acceleration. Selecting the undersampling factor R as small as possible for a given net acceleration yielded the best result in a clear majority of cases. For all data sets and coil geometries, the optimal kernel sizes and number of ACS lines were similar for a chosen undersampling factor R. In summary, the number of ACS lines should not be chosen below NACS=10-16. A robust choice for the kernel size was bx=9 and by=2-4.

摘要

基于广义自校准部分并行采集的并行成像广泛应用于临床常规。迄今为止,还没有详细的分析描述重建和采集参数(如自动校准信号 (ACS) 线数量 NACS、重建核大小 (bx×by) 和欠采样因子 R)对图像质量的依赖关系。为了评估它们对广义自校准部分并行采集性能的影响,分析了两个使用 12 通道和 32 通道接收线圈以及三个体内测量采集的体模数据集。在 R=2-4、NACS=4-64、bx=1-9 和 by=2-10 之间系统地改变重建参数,以表征它们对图像质量和噪声的影响。分析的一个主要方面是针对有效实现的净图像加速来优化参数集。在给定的净加速下,尽可能选择较小的欠采样因子 R 可在绝大多数情况下获得最佳结果。对于所有数据集和线圈几何形状,对于给定的欠采样因子 R,最佳核大小和 ACS 线数量相似。总之,ACS 线的数量不应低于 NACS=10-16。核大小的稳健选择是 bx=9 和 by=2-4。

相似文献

1
The effect of reconstruction and acquisition parameters for GRAPPA-based parallel imaging on the image quality.基于 GRAPPA 的并行成像重建和采集参数对图像质量的影响。
Magn Reson Med. 2011 Aug;66(2):402-9. doi: 10.1002/mrm.22803. Epub 2011 Mar 4.
2
Highly accelerated T1-weighted abdominal imaging using 2-dimensional controlled aliasing in parallel imaging results in higher acceleration: a comparison with generalized autocalibrating partially parallel acquisitions parallel imaging.采用二维并行采集压缩感知技术进行高加速 T1 加权腹部成像:与广义自动校准部分并行采集并行成像的比较。
Invest Radiol. 2013 Jul;48(7):554-61. doi: 10.1097/RLI.0b013e31828654ff.
3
Iterative GRAPPA (iGRAPPA) for improved parallel imaging reconstruction.用于改进并行成像重建的迭代GRAPPA(iGRAPPA)
Magn Reson Med. 2008 Apr;59(4):903-7. doi: 10.1002/mrm.21370.
4
Cross-validation-based kernel support selection for improved GRAPPA reconstruction.基于交叉验证的内核支持选择以改进GRAPPA重建
Magn Reson Med. 2008 Apr;59(4):819-25. doi: 10.1002/mrm.21535.
5
Improved parallel MR imaging using a coefficient penalized regularization for GRAPPA reconstruction.基于 GRAPPA 重建的系数惩罚正则化的并行磁共振成像改进。
Magn Reson Med. 2013 Apr;69(4):1109-14. doi: 10.1002/mrm.24344. Epub 2012 May 24.
6
Ghost artifact removal using a parallel imaging approach.使用并行成像方法去除鬼影伪影。
Magn Reson Med. 2005 Oct;54(4):1002-9. doi: 10.1002/mrm.20640.
7
Virtual coil concept for improved parallel MRI employing conjugate symmetric signals.采用共轭对称信号改进并行磁共振成像的虚拟线圈概念
Magn Reson Med. 2009 Jan;61(1):93-102. doi: 10.1002/mrm.21652.
8
Improving GRAPPA using cross-sampled autocalibration data.利用交叉采样自校准数据改进 GRAPPA。
Magn Reson Med. 2012 Apr;67(4):1042-53. doi: 10.1002/mrm.23083. Epub 2011 Aug 23.
9
General formulation for quantitative G-factor calculation in GRAPPA reconstructions.GRAPPA重建中定量G因子计算的通用公式。
Magn Reson Med. 2009 Sep;62(3):739-46. doi: 10.1002/mrm.22066.
10
IIR GRAPPA for parallel MR image reconstruction.并行磁共振图像重建的 IIR GRAPPA。
Magn Reson Med. 2010 Feb;63(2):502-9. doi: 10.1002/mrm.22197.

引用本文的文献

1
Accelerated Synthetic MRI with Deep Learning-Based Reconstruction for Pediatric Neuroimaging.基于深度学习重建的儿科神经成像加速合成 MRI。
AJNR Am J Neuroradiol. 2022 Nov;43(11):1653-1659. doi: 10.3174/ajnr.A7664. Epub 2022 Sep 29.
2
Effect of Matrix Size Reduction on Textural Information in Clinical Magnetic Resonance Imaging.临床磁共振成像中矩阵尺寸缩小对纹理信息的影响
J Clin Med. 2022 Apr 30;11(9):2526. doi: 10.3390/jcm11092526.
3
Compressed sensing MRI: a review from signal processing perspective.压缩感知磁共振成像:从信号处理角度的综述
BMC Biomed Eng. 2019 Mar 29;1:8. doi: 10.1186/s42490-019-0006-z. eCollection 2019.
4
Recent advances in parallel imaging for MRI.磁共振成像并行成像的最新进展。
Prog Nucl Magn Reson Spectrosc. 2017 Aug;101:71-95. doi: 10.1016/j.pnmrs.2017.04.002. Epub 2017 May 2.
5
Improvement of temporal signal-to-noise ratio of GRAPPA accelerated echo planar imaging using a FLASH based calibration scan.使用基于快速低角度激发(FLASH)的校准扫描改善GRAPPA加速回波平面成像的时间信噪比。
Magn Reson Med. 2016 Jun;75(6):2362-71. doi: 10.1002/mrm.25846. Epub 2015 Jul 20.
6
Calibrationless parallel magnetic resonance imaging: a joint sparsity model.无校准并行磁共振成像:联合稀疏模型。
Sensors (Basel). 2013 Dec 5;13(12):16714-35. doi: 10.3390/s131216714.
7
Sparsity-promoting calibration for GRAPPA accelerated parallel MRI reconstruction.促进 GRAPPA 加速并行 MRI 重建稀疏性的校准。
IEEE Trans Med Imaging. 2013 Jul;32(7):1325-35. doi: 10.1109/TMI.2013.2256923. Epub 2013 Apr 9.