• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

新旧骨水泥复合样本的特性

Properties of composite specimens of old and new bone cement.

作者信息

Acharya A, Timperley A J, Lee A J C

机构信息

Warrington and Halton Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Warrington, UK.

出版信息

Proc Inst Mech Eng H. 2011 Jan;225(1):86-93. doi: 10.1243/09544119JEIM804.

DOI:10.1243/09544119JEIM804
PMID:21381491
Abstract

The most common cause of failure of a total hip replacement is aseptic loosening of an implant. In a number of cases, the cement-bone interface of at least one component is not compromised. In cases of aseptic cup loosening, removal of a well-fixed femoral stem may be undertaken to facilitate exposure of the acetabulum for cup revision, and the surgeon may choose to leave the functional cement-bone interfaces in the femur undisturbed. After cup revision, new cement is pressurized within the old cement mantle and a stem is cemented into this 'old-new cement' composite. Retaining the old cement mantle is an attractive option as it reduces the duration of surgery, minimizes bleeding, and preserves the bone stock. Excellent results have been shown with this technique of 'in-cement femoral revision' using a double-tapered polished stem. While considerable literature is available on the short- and long-term properties of PMMA bone cement, very little is known about the mechanical properties of old-new composite cement specimens where the old cement is more than a few days old. This paper tests the properties of such old-new composite specimens where the 'old' cement is aged between 3.3 and 17.7 years, better reflecting clinical situations.

摘要

全髋关节置换失败最常见的原因是植入物的无菌性松动。在许多情况下,至少一个组件的骨水泥-骨界面并未受损。在无菌性髋臼杯松动的情况下,可以移除固定良好的股骨干以方便髋臼杯翻修时暴露髋臼,并且外科医生可能会选择不干扰股骨中功能良好的骨水泥-骨界面。髋臼杯翻修后,新骨水泥在旧骨水泥壳内加压,然后将一个柄部用骨水泥固定到这个“新旧骨水泥”复合体中。保留旧骨水泥壳是一个有吸引力的选择,因为它缩短了手术时间,减少了出血,并保留了骨量。使用双锥形抛光柄部的“骨水泥内股骨翻修”技术已显示出优异的效果。虽然有大量关于聚甲基丙烯酸甲酯(PMMA)骨水泥短期和长期性能的文献,但对于旧骨水泥超过几天的新旧复合骨水泥标本(试件)的力学性能却知之甚少。本文测试了“旧”骨水泥老化时间在3.3至17.7年之间的此类新旧复合标本(试件)的性能,能更好地反映临床情况。

相似文献

1
Properties of composite specimens of old and new bone cement.新旧骨水泥复合样本的特性
Proc Inst Mech Eng H. 2011 Jan;225(1):86-93. doi: 10.1243/09544119JEIM804.
2
[Early aseptic loosening of the CF 30 femoral stem].[CF 30股骨柄早期无菌性松动]
Acta Chir Orthop Traumatol Cech. 2007 Feb;74(1):59-64.
3
In vitro cyclic testing of the Exeter stem after cement within cement revision.骨水泥型翻修术中Exeter柄在骨水泥内的体外循环测试。
J Arthroplasty. 2009 Aug;24(5):789-94. doi: 10.1016/j.arth.2008.02.014. Epub 2008 Jun 4.
4
Revision of the cemented femoral stem using a cement-in-cement technique: a five- to 15-year review.采用骨水泥内骨水泥技术翻修骨水泥型股骨柄:5至15年的回顾
J Bone Joint Surg Br. 2009 May;91(5):577-82. doi: 10.1302/0301-620X.91B5.21621.
5
Cement-within-cement revision hip arthroplasty; should it be done?水泥内水泥翻修髋关节置换术;应该做吗?
J Bone Joint Surg Br. 1996 Sep;78(5):809-11.
6
Primary aseptic revision of the femoral component of a cemented total hip arthroplasty using a cemented technique without bone graft.初次使用骨水泥技术行全髋关节置换术股骨侧翻修,不使用植骨。
Orthop Traumatol Surg Res. 2009 Jun;95(4):243-8. doi: 10.1016/j.otsr.2009.04.007. Epub 2009 Jun 11.
7
Pull-out strength of a polished tapered stem is improved by placing bone cement over the shoulder of the implant.通过在植入物肩部上方放置骨水泥,可提高抛光锥形柄的拔出强度。
J Arthroplasty. 2009 Jan;24(1):139-43. doi: 10.1016/j.arth.2008.05.029. Epub 2008 Sep 26.
8
[Temporary antibiotic-loaded cemented prosthesis for two-stage septic hip arthroplasty].用于两阶段感染性髋关节置换术的临时载抗生素骨水泥假体
Rev Chir Orthop Reparatrice Appar Mot. 1997;83(5):466-8.
9
[A new method to optimize the adhesion between bone cement and acetabular bone in total hip arthroplasty].[一种在全髋关节置换术中优化骨水泥与髋臼骨之间黏附力的新方法]
Z Orthop Ihre Grenzgeb. 2003 Mar-Apr;141(2):209-16. doi: 10.1055/s-2003-38661.
10
The cement-bone bond is weaker than cement-cement bond in cement-in-cement revision arthroplasty. A comparative biomechanical study.在水泥-水泥翻修关节成形术中,水泥-骨结合比水泥-水泥结合弱。一项比较生物力学研究。
PLoS One. 2021 Feb 11;16(2):e0246740. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0246740. eCollection 2021.