Suppr超能文献

口腔炎症过程与全身健康。第 2 部分:根尖周炎症过程如何影响全身健康?

Oral inflammatory process and general health. Part 2: How does the periapical inflammatory process compromise general health?

机构信息

Section of Endodontics, Department of Odontostomatological Discipline, Catholic University of the Sacred Heart, Rome, Italy.

出版信息

Eur Rev Med Pharmacol Sci. 2011 Jan;15(1):35-51.

Abstract

At present, the focal infection theory still has very controversial aspects. In spite of the great number of studies, there is no evidence that focal infections or even antigenic mimicry are responsible for anything other than sporadic abscesses/infections and possibly rare autoimmune disorders. linflammation of endodontic origin (i.e., apical periodontitis--AP) has not received the same attention as inflammation originating from the periodontium. Endodontics is a microbiological problem, since the bacterial infection is the "prime mover" of pulp (before) and periapical (later) disease. The aims of endodontic treatment have to be considered from a microbiological viewpoint. Considering these problems in this second part of their study, the Authors, after close examination of the virulence of microorganisms and of the host defense, analyze the endodontic infection and microbiological species. They emphasize the possibility of a relationship between periapical inflammatory lesions and bacterial endocarditis in preventing metafocal disease. Bacterial endocarditis deserves special mention because despite involving specialists of two scientific fields, its prophylaxis is almost always assigned to medical practice, and especially, to dentistry. Given the dangers of the disease, antibiotic prophylaxis is both absolutely necessary and can be very effective, and it should be used especially in clinical situations with high risk individuals. However, the ability of antibiotic therapy to prevent or reduce the frequency, magnitude or duration of bacteremia associated with a dental procedure is controversial. Studies should also be undertaken to determine to compare the efficacy of endodontic treatment with alternative therapy such as implants, prosthetic replacements or no treatment other than extraction. To date, these studies have not been carried out, and there is no evidence to support the theory that modern endodontic therapy is not safe and effective.

摘要

目前,病灶感染理论仍存在许多争议。尽管进行了大量研究,但没有证据表明病灶感染甚至抗原模拟与除了散发性脓肿/感染和可能罕见的自身免疫疾病以外的任何疾病有关。源于牙髓的炎症(即根尖周炎-AP)没有像源于牙周组织的炎症那样受到同样的关注。牙髓病学是一个微生物学问题,因为细菌感染是牙髓(之前)和根尖周(之后)疾病的“启动者”。牙髓治疗的目的必须从微生物学的角度来考虑。在研究的第二部分中,作者们在仔细研究了微生物的毒力和宿主防御之后,分析了牙髓感染和微生物种类。他们强调了根尖周炎症病变与细菌性心内膜炎之间存在关系的可能性,这种关系可预防远隔部位的疾病。细菌性心内膜炎值得特别提及,因为尽管涉及两个科学领域的专家,但它的预防几乎总是归医疗实践,特别是牙科负责。鉴于这种疾病的危险,抗生素预防既绝对必要又非常有效,尤其应在具有高风险个体的临床情况下使用。然而,抗生素治疗预防或减少与牙科手术相关的菌血症的频率、程度或持续时间的能力存在争议。还应开展研究,以确定比较根管治疗与替代疗法(如种植体、修复体替代或除拔牙以外的其他治疗)的疗效。迄今为止,尚未开展这些研究,也没有证据支持现代根管治疗不安全和有效的理论。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验