Wu M-K, Dummer P M H, Wesselink P R
Department of Cariology Endodontology Pedodontology, Academic Centre for Dentistry Amsterdam (ACTA), Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
Int Endod J. 2006 May;39(5):343-56. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2591.2006.01092.x.
Bacterial sampling of prepared root canals is used to determine the presence and character of the remaining microbiota. However, it is likely that current sampling techniques only identify organisms in the main branches of the root canal system whereas it is unlikely that they can sample areas beyond the apical end-point of preparation and filling, or in lateral canals, canal extensions, apical ramifications, isthmuses and within dentinal tubules. Thus, it may be impossible by current techniques to identify residual post-treatment root canal infection. In histologic observations of root apices, bacteria have been found in inaccessible inter-canal isthmuses and accessory canals often in the form of biofilms. There is no in vivo evidence to support the assumption that these bacteria can be entombed effectively in the canal system by the root filling and thus be rendered harmless. As a consequence of this residual root infection, post-treatment apical periodontitis, which may be radiographically undetectable, may persist or develop as a defence mechanism to prevent the systemic spread of bacteria and/or their byproducts to other sites of the body. Histologic observation of root apices with surrounding bone removed from either patients or human cadavers has demonstrated that post-treatment apical periodontitis is associated with 50-90% of root filled human teeth. Thus, if the objective of root canal treatment is to eliminate apical periodontitis at a histological level, current treatment procedures are inadequate. It is essential that our knowledge of the local and systemic consequences of both residual post-treatment root infection and post-treatment apical periodontitis be improved. The continued development of treatments that can effectively eliminate root infection is therefore a priority in clinical endodontic research. Post-treatment disease following root canal treatment is most often associated with poor quality procedures that do not remove intra-canal infection; this scenario can be corrected via a nonsurgical approach. However, infection remaining in the inaccessible apical areas, extraradicular infection including apically extruded dentine debris with bacteria present in dentinal tubules, true radicular cysts, and foreign body reactions require a surgical intervention.
对预备后的根管进行细菌采样,用于确定残余微生物群的存在及特征。然而,当前的采样技术可能仅能识别根管系统主要分支中的微生物,而不太可能对超出预备和充填根尖终点以外的区域、侧支根管、根管分支、根尖分支、峡部以及牙本质小管内的区域进行采样。因此,采用当前技术可能无法识别根管治疗后残留的感染。在根尖的组织学观察中,已在难以到达的根管峡部和副根管中发现细菌,且这些细菌通常以生物膜的形式存在。目前尚无体内证据支持以下假设:这些细菌可通过根管充填有效地包埋在根管系统中,从而变得无害。由于这种残留的根管感染,根管治疗后根尖周炎(可能在影像学上无法检测到)可能会持续存在或发展,作为一种防御机制以防止细菌和/或其副产物向身体其他部位的全身扩散。对患者或人类尸体去除周围骨质的根尖进行组织学观察表明,根管治疗后根尖周炎与50% - 90%的根管充填后的人类牙齿相关。因此,如果根管治疗的目标是在组织学水平上消除根尖周炎,那么当前的治疗程序是不充分的。我们必须增进对根管治疗后残留感染和根尖周炎的局部及全身后果的了解。因此,持续开发能够有效消除根管感染的治疗方法是临床牙髓病学研究的首要任务。根管治疗后的疾病通常与未能有效清除根管内感染的低质量操作有关;这种情况可通过非手术方法纠正。然而,残留于难以到达的根尖区域的感染、包括根尖挤出的含有牙本质小管内细菌的牙本质碎屑的根外感染、真正的根囊肿以及异物反应则需要手术干预。