Department of Intensive Care, Academic Medical Center, University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
Anesthesiology. 2011 May;114(5):1138-43. doi: 10.1097/ALN.0b013e31820d8676.
With adaptive support ventilation, respiratory rate and tidal volume (V(T)) are a function of the Otis least work of breathing formula. We hypothesized that adaptive support ventilation in an open lung ventilator strategy would deliver higher V(T)s to patients with acute lung injury.
Patients with acute lung injury were ventilated according to a local guideline advising the use of lower V(T) (6-8 ml/kg predicted body weight), high concentrations of positive end-expiratory pressure, and recruitment maneuvers. Ventilation parameters were recorded when the ventilator was switched to adaptive support ventilation, and after recruitment maneuvers. If V(T) increased more than 8 ml/kg predicted body weight, airway pressure was limited to correct for the rise of V(T).
Ten patients with a mean (±SD) Pao(2)/Fio(2) of 171 ± 86 mmHg were included. After a switch from pressure-controlled ventilation to adaptive support ventilation, respiratory rate declined (from 31 ± 5 to 21 ± 6 breaths/min; difference = 10 breaths/min, 95% CI 3-17 breaths/min, P = 0.008) and V(T) increased (from 6.5 ± 0.8 to 9.0 ± 1.6 ml/kg predicted body weight; difference = 2.5 ml, 95% CI 0.4-4.6 ml/kg predicted body weight, P = 0.02). Pressure limitation corrected for the rise of V(T), but minute ventilation declined, forcing the user to switch back to pressure-controlled ventilation.
Adaptive support ventilation, compared with pressure-controlled ventilation in an open lung strategy setting, delivers a lower respiratory rate-higher V(T) combination. Pressure limitation does correct for the rise of V(T), but leads to a decline in minute ventilation.
适应性支持通气(adaptive support ventilation,ASV)使呼吸频率和潮气量(tidal volume,V(T))成为 Otis 最小呼吸功公式的函数。我们假设在开放肺通气策略中使用 ASV 会向急性肺损伤(acute lung injury,ALI)患者输送更高的 V(T)。
根据当地指南建议使用较低的 V(T)(预测体重的 6-8ml/kg)、高浓度的呼气末正压(positive end-expiratory pressure,PEEP)和复张手法,对 ALI 患者进行通气。当通气机切换至适应性支持通气(adaptive support ventilation,ASV)并在复张手法后记录通气参数。如果 V(T)增加超过预测体重的 8ml/kg,则限制气道压力以纠正 V(T)的升高。
共纳入 10 例平均(±标准差)氧分压/吸入氧分数(Pao(2)/Fio(2))为 171±86mmHg 的患者。从压力控制通气切换至适应性支持通气后,呼吸频率下降(从 31±5 次/分降至 21±6 次/分;差值为 10 次/分,95%置信区间为 3-17 次/分,P=0.008),V(T)增加(从 6.5±0.8ml/kg 预测体重增至 9.0±1.6ml/kg 预测体重;差值为 2.5ml,95%置信区间为 0.4-4.6ml/kg 预测体重,P=0.02)。压力限制纠正了 V(T)的升高,但分钟通气量下降,迫使使用者切换回压力控制通气。
与开放肺策略中的压力控制通气相比,ASV 提供了更低的呼吸频率-更高的 V(T)组合。压力限制确实纠正了 V(T)的升高,但导致分钟通气量下降。