• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

应用简化的 Bishop 评分预测阴道分娩。

Using a simplified Bishop score to predict vaginal delivery.

机构信息

From the Eunice Kennedy Shriver National Institute of Child Health and Human Development, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, Maryland.

出版信息

Obstet Gynecol. 2011 Apr;117(4):805-811. doi: 10.1097/AOG.0b013e3182114ad2.

DOI:10.1097/AOG.0b013e3182114ad2
PMID:21383643
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC3297470/
Abstract

OBJECTIVE

The Bishop score is the most commonly used method to assess the readiness of the cervix for induction. However, it was created without modern statistical methods. Our objective was to determine whether a simplified score can predict vaginal delivery equally well.

METHODS

Data were analyzed for 5,610 nulliparous women with singleton, uncomplicated pregnancies between 37 0/7 and 41 6/7 weeks of gestation undergoing labor induction. These women had all five components of the Bishop score recorded. Logistic regression was performed and a simplified score created with significant components. Positive and negative predictive values and positive likelihood ratios were calculated.

RESULTS

In the regression model, only dilation, station, and effacement were significantly associated with vaginal delivery (P<.01). The simplified Bishop score was then devised using these three components (range 0-9) and compared with the original Bishop score (range 0-13) for prediction of successful induction, resulting in vaginal delivery. Compared with the original Bishop score (greater than 8), the simplified Bishop score (greater than 5) had a similar or better positive predictive value (87.7% compared with 87.0%), negative predictive value (31.3% compared with 29.8%), positive likelihood ratio (2.34 compared with 2.19), and correct classification rate (51.0% compared with 47.3%). Application of the simplified Bishop score in other populations, including indicated induction and spontaneous labor at term and preterm, were associated with similar vaginal delivery rates compared with the original Bishop score.

CONCLUSION

The simplified Bishop score comprised of dilation, station, and effacement attains a similarly high predictive ability of successful induction as the original score.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

II.

摘要

目的

Bishop 评分是评估宫颈引产准备情况最常用的方法。然而,它是在没有现代统计方法的情况下创建的。我们的目的是确定简化评分是否可以同样很好地预测阴道分娩。

方法

对 5610 名初产妇进行了数据分析,这些产妇的单胎、无并发症妊娠处于 37 0/7 至 41 6/7 孕周,正在进行引产。这些女性的 Bishop 评分的所有五个组成部分都有记录。进行了逻辑回归,并创建了一个具有显著成分的简化评分。计算了阳性和阴性预测值以及阳性似然比。

结果

在回归模型中,只有扩张、位置和消失与阴道分娩显著相关(P<.01)。然后,使用这三个组成部分(范围 0-9)设计了简化的 Bishop 评分,并将其与原始 Bishop 评分(范围 0-13)进行比较,以预测成功引产和阴道分娩。与原始 Bishop 评分(大于 8)相比,简化的 Bishop 评分(大于 5)具有相似或更好的阳性预测值(87.7%比 87.0%)、阴性预测值(31.3%比 29.8%)、阳性似然比(2.34 比 2.19)和正确分类率(51.0%比 47.3%)。简化 Bishop 评分在其他人群中的应用,包括有指征的引产、足月和早产时的自发性分娩,与原始 Bishop 评分相比,阴道分娩率相似。

结论

由扩张、位置和消失组成的简化 Bishop 评分与原始评分一样具有很高的预测引产成功能力。

证据水平

II。

相似文献

1
Using a simplified Bishop score to predict vaginal delivery.应用简化的 Bishop 评分预测阴道分娩。
Obstet Gynecol. 2011 Apr;117(4):805-811. doi: 10.1097/AOG.0b013e3182114ad2.
2
Externally Validated Prediction Model of Vaginal Delivery After Preterm Induction With Unfavorable Cervix.经宫颈条件不佳的早产引产患者阴道分娩的外部验证预测模型。
Obstet Gynecol. 2020 Oct;136(4):716-724. doi: 10.1097/AOG.0000000000004039.
3
Bishop score and ultrasound assessment of the cervix for prediction of time to onset of labor and time to delivery in prolonged pregnancy.Bishop评分及宫颈超声评估对过期妊娠发动分娩时间及分娩时间的预测
Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 2006 Sep;28(3):298-305. doi: 10.1002/uog.2746.
4
Insulin-like growth factor binding protein 1, Bishop score, and sonographic cervical length: tolerability and prediction of vaginal birth and vaginal birth within 24 hours following labour induction in nulliparous women.胰岛素样生长因子结合蛋白 1、Bishop 评分和超声宫颈长度:在初产妇中诱导分娩后对阴道分娩和 24 小时内阴道分娩的耐受性和预测。
BJOG. 2017 Jul;124(8):1274-1283. doi: 10.1111/1471-0528.14175. Epub 2016 Jun 27.
5
Simplified Bishop score including parity predicts successful induction of labor.包括产次的简化 Bishop 评分可预测引产成功。
Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol. 2016 Aug;203:309-14. doi: 10.1016/j.ejogrb.2016.06.007. Epub 2016 Jul 5.
6
Favorable Simplified Bishop Score after cervical ripening associated with decreased cesarean birth rate.宫颈成熟后简化 Bishop 评分良好与剖宫产率降低相关。
Am J Obstet Gynecol MFM. 2022 Mar;4(2):100534. doi: 10.1016/j.ajogmf.2021.100534. Epub 2021 Nov 20.
7
Is the Bishop-score significant in predicting the success of labor induction in multiparous women?Bishop评分在预测经产妇引产成功率方面有意义吗?
J Perinatol. 2017 May;37(5):480-483. doi: 10.1038/jp.2016.260. Epub 2017 Feb 9.
8
Transvaginal ultrasound measurement of cervical length in the supine and upright positions versus Bishop score in predicting successful induction of labor at term.经阴道超声测量仰卧位和直立位宫颈长度与 Bishop 评分在预测足月引产成功中的比较
Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 2009 Feb;33(2):213-20. doi: 10.1002/uog.6219.
9
Preinduction sonographic measurement of cervical length in the prediction of successful induction of labor.引产术前超声测量宫颈长度对预测引产成功的作用
Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 2001 Dec;18(6):623-8. doi: 10.1046/j.0960-7692.2001.00580.x.
10
Transvaginal sonographic measurement of cervical length vs. Bishop score in labor induction at term: tolerability and prediction of Cesarean delivery.足月引产时经阴道超声测量宫颈长度与Bishop评分的比较:耐受性及剖宫产预测
Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 2007 May;29(5):568-73. doi: 10.1002/uog.4018.

引用本文的文献

1
Nulliparas at Term with Premature Rupture of Membranes and an Unfavorable Cervix: Labor Induction with Prostaglandin or Oxytocin? A Retrospective Matched Case Study.足月未产妇胎膜早破且宫颈条件不佳:使用前列腺素还是缩宫素引产?一项回顾性配对病例研究。
J Clin Med. 2024 Jun 9;13(12):3384. doi: 10.3390/jcm13123384.
2
Membrane stripping in group B streptococcus carriers does not impede adequate intrapartum antibiotic prophylaxis: a retrospective study.B族链球菌携带者的胎膜剥除并不妨碍充分的产时抗生素预防:一项回顾性研究。
Front Med (Lausanne). 2024 Apr 5;11:1368998. doi: 10.3389/fmed.2024.1368998. eCollection 2024.
3
Digital Examination vs. 4D Transperineal Ultrasound-Do They Compare in Labour Management? A Pilot Study.指检与经会阴四维超声检查——它们在产程管理中效果相当吗?一项初步研究。
Diagnostics (Basel). 2024 Jan 30;14(3):293. doi: 10.3390/diagnostics14030293.
4
The Correct Indication to Induce Labour in a Swiss Cantonal Hospital.瑞士某州立医院引产的正确指征
J Clin Med. 2023 Oct 14;12(20):6515. doi: 10.3390/jcm12206515.
5
Reassessing the Bishop score in clinical practice for induction of labor leading to vaginal delivery and for evaluation of cervix ripening.重新评估临床实践中用于引产以实现阴道分娩及评估宫颈成熟度的 Bishop 评分。
Placenta Reprod Med. 2023 Jan 31;2. doi: 10.54844/prm.2023.0353. Epub 2023 Jun 29.
6
Assessing uterine electrophysiology prior to elective term induction of labor.在择期足月引产之前评估子宫电生理学。
Curr Res Physiol. 2023 Jul 21;6:100103. doi: 10.1016/j.crphys.2023.100103. eCollection 2023.
7
A predictive model for successfully inducing active labor among pregnant women: Combining cervical status assessment and clinical characteristics.一种预测孕妇成功引产的模型:结合宫颈状态评估和临床特征。
Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol X. 2023 May 3;18:100196. doi: 10.1016/j.eurox.2023.100196. eCollection 2023 Jun.
8
Eclampsia and Its Treatment Modalities: A Review Article.子痫及其治疗方式:一篇综述文章。
Cureus. 2022 Sep 12;14(9):e29080. doi: 10.7759/cureus.29080. eCollection 2022 Sep.
9
Labor induction in China: a nationwide survey.中国的引产:一项全国性调查。
BMC Pregnancy Childbirth. 2022 Jun 1;22(1):463. doi: 10.1186/s12884-022-04760-6.
10
Failed induction of labor and associated factors in Adama Hospital Medical College, Oromia Regional State, Ethiopia.埃塞俄比亚奥罗米亚州阿达马医院医学院引产失败及相关因素
SAGE Open Med. 2022 Mar 14;10:20503121221081009. doi: 10.1177/20503121221081009. eCollection 2022.

本文引用的文献

1
Contemporary cesarean delivery practice in the United States.当代美国的剖宫产实践。
Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2010 Oct;203(4):326.e1-326.e10. doi: 10.1016/j.ajog.2010.06.058. Epub 2010 Aug 12.
2
Preinduction cervical assessment.诱导前宫颈评估。
Clin Obstet Gynecol. 2006 Sep;49(3):564-72. doi: 10.1097/00003081-200609000-00016.
3
Predictors of successful labor induction with oral or vaginal misoprostol.口服或阴道用米索前列醇引产成功的预测因素。
J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med. 2004 May;15(5):319-23. doi: 10.1080/14767050410001702195.
4
Prediction of successful induction of labor at term: role of clinical history, digital examination, ultrasound assessment of the cervix, and fetal fibronectin assay.足月引产成功的预测:临床病史、指诊、宫颈超声评估及胎儿纤维连接蛋白检测的作用
Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2003 Nov;189(5):1361-7. doi: 10.1067/s0002-9378(03)00725-7.
5
PELVIC SCORING FOR ELECTIVE INDUCTION.择期引产的骨盆评分
Obstet Gynecol. 1964 Aug;24:266-8.
6
Diagnosis and management of gestational hypertension and preeclampsia.妊娠期高血压疾病和子痫前期的诊断与管理
Obstet Gynecol. 2003 Jul;102(1):181-92. doi: 10.1016/s0029-7844(03)00475-7.
7
Chronic hypertension in pregnancy.妊娠期慢性高血压
Obstet Gynecol. 2002 Aug;100(2):369-77. doi: 10.1016/s0029-7844(02)02128-2.
8
Induction of labour for suspected fetal macrosomia.因怀疑胎儿巨大而引产。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2000(2):CD000938. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD000938.
9
Factors predicting successful labor induction.预测引产成功的因素。
Obstet Gynecol. 1996 Dec;88(6):990-2. doi: 10.1016/s0029-7844(96)00321-3.
10
Prelabor evaluation of inducibility.引产可诱导性的产前评估。
Obstet Gynecol. 1982 Aug;60(2):137-47.