Suppr超能文献

应用简化的 Bishop 评分预测阴道分娩。

Using a simplified Bishop score to predict vaginal delivery.

机构信息

From the Eunice Kennedy Shriver National Institute of Child Health and Human Development, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, Maryland.

出版信息

Obstet Gynecol. 2011 Apr;117(4):805-811. doi: 10.1097/AOG.0b013e3182114ad2.

Abstract

OBJECTIVE

The Bishop score is the most commonly used method to assess the readiness of the cervix for induction. However, it was created without modern statistical methods. Our objective was to determine whether a simplified score can predict vaginal delivery equally well.

METHODS

Data were analyzed for 5,610 nulliparous women with singleton, uncomplicated pregnancies between 37 0/7 and 41 6/7 weeks of gestation undergoing labor induction. These women had all five components of the Bishop score recorded. Logistic regression was performed and a simplified score created with significant components. Positive and negative predictive values and positive likelihood ratios were calculated.

RESULTS

In the regression model, only dilation, station, and effacement were significantly associated with vaginal delivery (P<.01). The simplified Bishop score was then devised using these three components (range 0-9) and compared with the original Bishop score (range 0-13) for prediction of successful induction, resulting in vaginal delivery. Compared with the original Bishop score (greater than 8), the simplified Bishop score (greater than 5) had a similar or better positive predictive value (87.7% compared with 87.0%), negative predictive value (31.3% compared with 29.8%), positive likelihood ratio (2.34 compared with 2.19), and correct classification rate (51.0% compared with 47.3%). Application of the simplified Bishop score in other populations, including indicated induction and spontaneous labor at term and preterm, were associated with similar vaginal delivery rates compared with the original Bishop score.

CONCLUSION

The simplified Bishop score comprised of dilation, station, and effacement attains a similarly high predictive ability of successful induction as the original score.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

II.

摘要

目的

Bishop 评分是评估宫颈引产准备情况最常用的方法。然而,它是在没有现代统计方法的情况下创建的。我们的目的是确定简化评分是否可以同样很好地预测阴道分娩。

方法

对 5610 名初产妇进行了数据分析,这些产妇的单胎、无并发症妊娠处于 37 0/7 至 41 6/7 孕周,正在进行引产。这些女性的 Bishop 评分的所有五个组成部分都有记录。进行了逻辑回归,并创建了一个具有显著成分的简化评分。计算了阳性和阴性预测值以及阳性似然比。

结果

在回归模型中,只有扩张、位置和消失与阴道分娩显著相关(P<.01)。然后,使用这三个组成部分(范围 0-9)设计了简化的 Bishop 评分,并将其与原始 Bishop 评分(范围 0-13)进行比较,以预测成功引产和阴道分娩。与原始 Bishop 评分(大于 8)相比,简化的 Bishop 评分(大于 5)具有相似或更好的阳性预测值(87.7%比 87.0%)、阴性预测值(31.3%比 29.8%)、阳性似然比(2.34 比 2.19)和正确分类率(51.0%比 47.3%)。简化 Bishop 评分在其他人群中的应用,包括有指征的引产、足月和早产时的自发性分娩,与原始 Bishop 评分相比,阴道分娩率相似。

结论

由扩张、位置和消失组成的简化 Bishop 评分与原始评分一样具有很高的预测引产成功能力。

证据水平

II。

相似文献

1
Using a simplified Bishop score to predict vaginal delivery.应用简化的 Bishop 评分预测阴道分娩。
Obstet Gynecol. 2011 Apr;117(4):805-811. doi: 10.1097/AOG.0b013e3182114ad2.
5
Simplified Bishop score including parity predicts successful induction of labor.包括产次的简化 Bishop 评分可预测引产成功。
Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol. 2016 Aug;203:309-14. doi: 10.1016/j.ejogrb.2016.06.007. Epub 2016 Jul 5.

引用本文的文献

6
Assessing uterine electrophysiology prior to elective term induction of labor.在择期足月引产之前评估子宫电生理学。
Curr Res Physiol. 2023 Jul 21;6:100103. doi: 10.1016/j.crphys.2023.100103. eCollection 2023.
8
Eclampsia and Its Treatment Modalities: A Review Article.子痫及其治疗方式:一篇综述文章。
Cureus. 2022 Sep 12;14(9):e29080. doi: 10.7759/cureus.29080. eCollection 2022 Sep.
9
Labor induction in China: a nationwide survey.中国的引产:一项全国性调查。
BMC Pregnancy Childbirth. 2022 Jun 1;22(1):463. doi: 10.1186/s12884-022-04760-6.

本文引用的文献

1
Contemporary cesarean delivery practice in the United States.当代美国的剖宫产实践。
Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2010 Oct;203(4):326.e1-326.e10. doi: 10.1016/j.ajog.2010.06.058. Epub 2010 Aug 12.
2
Preinduction cervical assessment.诱导前宫颈评估。
Clin Obstet Gynecol. 2006 Sep;49(3):564-72. doi: 10.1097/00003081-200609000-00016.
7
Chronic hypertension in pregnancy.妊娠期慢性高血压
Obstet Gynecol. 2002 Aug;100(2):369-77. doi: 10.1016/s0029-7844(02)02128-2.
8
Induction of labour for suspected fetal macrosomia.因怀疑胎儿巨大而引产。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2000(2):CD000938. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD000938.
9
Factors predicting successful labor induction.预测引产成功的因素。
Obstet Gynecol. 1996 Dec;88(6):990-2. doi: 10.1016/s0029-7844(96)00321-3.

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验