• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

制定并测试决策框以促进初级保健中的共享决策——研究方案。

Developing and user-testing Decision boxes to facilitate shared decision making in primary care--a study protocol.

机构信息

Research Center of the CHUQ, Saint-Francois d'Assise Hospital, and Department de médecine familliale, University Laval, Quebec City, Canada.

出版信息

BMC Med Inform Decis Mak. 2011 Mar 9;11:17. doi: 10.1186/1472-6947-11-17.

DOI:10.1186/1472-6947-11-17
PMID:21385470
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC3060840/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Applying evidence is one of the most challenging steps of evidence-based clinical practice. Healthcare professionals have difficulty interpreting evidence and translating it to patients. Decision boxes are summaries of the most important benefits and harms of diagnostic, therapeutic, and preventive health interventions provided to healthcare professionals before they meet the patient. Our hypothesis is that Decision boxes will prepare clinicians to help patients make informed value-based decisions. By acting as primers, the boxes will enhance the application of evidence-based practices and increase shared decision making during the clinical encounter. The objectives of this study are to provide a framework for developing Decision boxes and testing their value to users.

METHODS/DESIGN: We will begin by developing Decision box prototypes for 10 clinical conditions or topics based on a review of the research on risk communication. We will present two prototypes to purposeful samples of 16 family physicians distributed in two focus groups, and 32 patients distributed in four focus groups. We will use the User Experience Model framework to explore users' perceptions of the content and format of each prototype. All discussions will be transcribed, and two researchers will independently perform a hybrid deductive/inductive thematic qualitative analysis of the data. The coding scheme will be developed a priori from the User Experience Model's seven themes (valuable, usable, credible, useful, desirable, accessible and findable), and will include new themes suggested by the data (inductive analysis). Key findings will be triangulated using additional publications on the design of tools to improve risk communication. All 10 Decision boxes will be modified in light of our findings.

DISCUSSION

This study will produce a robust framework for developing and testing Decision boxes that will serve healthcare professionals and patients alike. It is the first step in the development and implementation of a new tool that should facilitate decision making in clinical practice.

摘要

背景

将证据应用于临床实践是循证实践中最具挑战性的步骤之一。医疗保健专业人员在解释证据并将其转化为患者方面存在困难。决策框是在医疗保健专业人员与患者见面之前为他们提供的诊断、治疗和预防健康干预措施最重要的益处和危害的摘要。我们的假设是,决策框将使临床医生能够帮助患者做出基于价值的知情决策。通过充当入门书,这些盒子将增强基于证据的实践的应用,并在临床遇到时增加共同决策。本研究的目的是为开发决策框提供框架,并测试其对用户的价值。

方法/设计:我们将首先根据风险沟通研究回顾,为 10 种临床情况或主题开发决策框原型。我们将向分布在两个焦点小组中的 16 名家庭医生和分布在四个焦点小组中的 32 名患者展示两个原型。我们将使用用户体验模型框架来探索用户对每个原型的内容和格式的看法。所有讨论都将被转录,两名研究人员将对数据进行独立的混合演绎/归纳主题定性分析。编码方案将根据用户体验模型的七个主题(有价值、可用、可信、有用、理想、可及和可查找)预先制定,并将包括数据中提出的新主题(归纳分析)。关键发现将使用有关改进风险沟通工具设计的其他出版物进行三角测量。根据我们的发现,将对所有 10 个决策框进行修改。

讨论

本研究将为开发和测试决策框提供一个强大的框架,为医疗保健专业人员和患者提供服务。这是开发和实施新工具的第一步,该工具应有助于临床实践中的决策制定。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/47ed/3060840/9bd495e9c135/1472-6947-11-17-4.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/47ed/3060840/e88095776df4/1472-6947-11-17-1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/47ed/3060840/1d32c92bc2a8/1472-6947-11-17-2.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/47ed/3060840/b846e319dc4c/1472-6947-11-17-3.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/47ed/3060840/9bd495e9c135/1472-6947-11-17-4.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/47ed/3060840/e88095776df4/1472-6947-11-17-1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/47ed/3060840/1d32c92bc2a8/1472-6947-11-17-2.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/47ed/3060840/b846e319dc4c/1472-6947-11-17-3.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/47ed/3060840/9bd495e9c135/1472-6947-11-17-4.jpg

相似文献

1
Developing and user-testing Decision boxes to facilitate shared decision making in primary care--a study protocol.制定并测试决策框以促进初级保健中的共享决策——研究方案。
BMC Med Inform Decis Mak. 2011 Mar 9;11:17. doi: 10.1186/1472-6947-11-17.
2
Decision boxes for clinicians to support evidence-based practice and shared decision making: the user experience.临床医生支持循证实践和共享决策的决策框:用户体验。
Implement Sci. 2012 Aug 3;7:72. doi: 10.1186/1748-5908-7-72.
3
Barriers and facilitators to implementing Decision Boxes in primary healthcare teams to facilitate shared decisionmaking: a study protocol.实施决策盒以促进初级保健团队中的共享决策:研究方案。
BMC Med Inform Decis Mak. 2012 Aug 6;12:85. doi: 10.1186/1472-6947-12-85.
4
Developing a two-sided intervention to facilitate shared decision-making in haemophilia: decision boxes for clinicians and patient decision aids for patients.制定一种双向干预措施以促进血友病的共同决策:为临床医生设计决策框,为患者设计患者决策辅助工具。
Haemophilia. 2014 Nov;20(6):800-6. doi: 10.1111/hae.12495. Epub 2014 Oct 2.
5
The future of Cochrane Neonatal.考克兰新生儿协作网的未来。
Early Hum Dev. 2020 Nov;150:105191. doi: 10.1016/j.earlhumdev.2020.105191. Epub 2020 Sep 12.
6
Decision aids linked to evidence summaries and clinical practice guidelines: results from user-testing in clinical encounters.与证据总结和临床实践指南相关的决策辅助工具:临床诊疗中用户测试的结果
BMC Med Inform Decis Mak. 2021 Jun 29;21(1):202. doi: 10.1186/s12911-021-01541-7.
7
Digital encounter decision aids linked to clinical practice guidelines: results from user testing SHARE-IT decision aids in primary care.数字邂逅决策辅助工具与临床实践指南相关联:在初级保健中测试 SHARE-IT 决策辅助工具的结果。
BMC Med Inform Decis Mak. 2023 May 22;23(1):97. doi: 10.1186/s12911-023-02186-4.
8
Interventions for improving the adoption of shared decision making by healthcare professionals.提高医疗保健专业人员采用共同决策的干预措施。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2010 May 12(5):CD006732. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD006732.pub2.
9
Evidence summaries (decision boxes) to prepare clinicians for shared decision-making with patients: a mixed methods implementation study.为帮助临床医生与患者进行共同决策而准备的证据总结(决策框):一项混合方法实施研究。
Implement Sci. 2014 Oct 5;9:144. doi: 10.1186/s13012-014-0144-6.
10
Blood tests in primary care: A qualitative study of communication and decision-making between doctors and patients.基层医疗中的血液检测:医生与患者间沟通和决策的定性研究。
Health Expect. 2022 Oct;25(5):2453-2461. doi: 10.1111/hex.13564. Epub 2022 Jul 19.

引用本文的文献

1
Continuous adaptation of conversation aids for uterine fibroids treatment options in a four-year multi-center implementation project.在一个为期四年的多中心实施项目中,不断调整对话辅助工具以适应子宫肌瘤治疗方案。
BMC Med Inform Decis Mak. 2024 Sep 30;24(1):277. doi: 10.1186/s12911-024-02637-6.
2
Colorectal Cancer Screening Decision Based on Predicted Risk: Protocol for a Pilot Randomized Controlled Trial.基于预测风险的结直肠癌筛查决策:一项试点随机对照试验方案
JMIR Res Protoc. 2023 Sep 7;12:e46865. doi: 10.2196/46865.
3
What do women and healthcare professionals expect of decision aids for breast cancer screening? A qualitative study in France.

本文引用的文献

1
Helping Doctors and Patients Make Sense of Health Statistics.帮助医生和患者理解健康统计数据。
Psychol Sci Public Interest. 2007 Nov;8(2):53-96. doi: 10.1111/j.1539-6053.2008.00033.x. Epub 2007 Nov 1.
2
Evaluation of email alerts in practice: Part 2. Validation of the information assessment method.实践中电子邮件警报的评估:第 2 部分。信息评估方法的验证。
J Eval Clin Pract. 2010 Dec;16(6):1236-43. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2753.2009.01313.x. Epub 2010 Aug 15.
3
Training family physicians in shared decision making for the use of antibiotics for acute respiratory infections: a pilot clustered randomized controlled trial.
女性和医疗保健专业人员对乳腺癌筛查决策辅助工具的期望是什么?法国的一项定性研究。
BMJ Open. 2022 Mar 15;12(3):e058879. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2021-058879.
4
Systematic Development of Patient Decision Aids: An Update from the IPDAS Collaboration.系统开发患者决策辅助工具:来自 IPDAS 合作组织的最新更新。
Med Decis Making. 2021 Oct;41(7):736-754. doi: 10.1177/0272989X211014163. Epub 2021 Jun 19.
5
An Analytical Mobile App for Shared Decision Making About Prenatal Screening: Protocol for a Mixed Methods Study.一款用于产前筛查共同决策的分析型移动应用程序:一项混合方法研究的方案
JMIR Res Protoc. 2019 Oct 8;8(10):e13321. doi: 10.2196/13321.
6
Integrating patient perspectives in medical decision-making: a qualitative interview study examining potentials within the rare disease information exchange process in practice.将患者观点融入医疗决策中:一项定性访谈研究,旨在探讨实践中罕见病信息交流过程中的潜力。
BMC Med Inform Decis Mak. 2019 Sep 18;19(1):188. doi: 10.1186/s12911-019-0911-z.
7
Integrating user behavior with engineering design of point-of-care diagnostic devices: theoretical framework and empirical findings.将用户行为与即时诊断设备的工程设计相结合:理论框架和实证研究结果。
Lab Chip. 2019 Jun 25;19(13):2241-2255. doi: 10.1039/c9lc00188c.
8
User-testing an interactive option grid decision aid for prostate cancer screening: lessons to improve usability.用户测试交互式选项网格决策辅助工具在前列腺癌筛查中的应用:提高可用性的经验教训。
BMJ Open. 2019 May 27;9(5):e026748. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2018-026748.
9
Tailoring and evaluating an intervention to improve shared decision-making among seniors with dementia, their caregivers, and healthcare providers: study protocol for a randomized controlled trial.定制和评估一项干预措施以改善老年痴呆症患者、其护理人员和医疗服务提供者之间的共同决策:一项随机对照试验的研究方案
Trials. 2018 Jun 25;19(1):332. doi: 10.1186/s13063-018-2697-1.
10
Policymaker experiences with rapid response briefs to address health-system and technology questions in Uganda.政策制定者运用快速反应简报解决乌干达卫生系统和技术问题的经验。
Health Res Policy Syst. 2017 May 3;15(1):37. doi: 10.1186/s12961-017-0200-1.
培训家庭医生在急性呼吸道感染中使用抗生素方面进行共享决策:一项试点聚类随机对照试验。
Health Expect. 2011 Mar;14 Suppl 1(Suppl 1):96-110. doi: 10.1111/j.1369-7625.2010.00616.x.
4
User testing and stakeholder feedback contributed to the development of understandable and useful Summary of Findings tables for Cochrane reviews.用户测试和利益相关者的反馈有助于为 Cochrane 综述开发出易于理解和有用的发现摘要表。
J Clin Epidemiol. 2010 Jun;63(6):607-19. doi: 10.1016/j.jclinepi.2009.12.013.
5
Who profits from visual aids: overcoming challenges in people's understanding of risks [corrected].谁从视觉辅助中受益:克服人们对风险理解的挑战 [已更正]。
Soc Sci Med. 2010 Apr;70(7):1019-25. doi: 10.1016/j.socscimed.2009.11.031. Epub 2010 Jan 28.
6
Shared decision making interventions for people with mental health conditions.针对患有精神疾病的人群的共同决策干预措施。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2010 Jan 20;2010(1):CD007297. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD007297.pub2.
7
The Statin Choice decision aid in primary care: a randomized trial.他汀类药物选择决策辅助在基层医疗中的应用:一项随机试验。
Patient Educ Couns. 2010 Jul;80(1):138-40. doi: 10.1016/j.pec.2009.10.008. Epub 2009 Dec 2.
8
Accessing pre-appraised evidence: fine-tuning the 5S model into a 6S model.获取预先评估的证据:将5S模型微调为6S模型。
Evid Based Nurs. 2009 Oct;12(4):99-101. doi: 10.1136/ebn.12.4.99-b.
9
Decision aids for people facing health treatment or screening decisions.为面临医疗治疗或筛查决策的人群提供的决策辅助工具。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2009 Jul 8(3):CD001431. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD001431.pub2.
10
Assessing the quality of decision support technologies using the International Patient Decision Aid Standards instrument (IPDASi).使用国际患者决策辅助标准工具(IPDASi)评估决策支持技术的质量。
PLoS One. 2009;4(3):e4705. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0004705. Epub 2009 Mar 4.