Suppr超能文献

比较一种简单的前列腺放射治疗剂量引导干预技术与现有的解剖图像引导方法。

Comparison of a simple dose-guided intervention technique for prostate radiotherapy with existing anatomical image guidance methods.

机构信息

Regional Medical Physics Department, Freeman Hospital, Newcastle upon Tyne, UK.

出版信息

Br J Radiol. 2012 Feb;85(1010):127-34. doi: 10.1259/bjr/13032912. Epub 2011 Mar 8.

Abstract

OBJECTIVES

A simple dose-guided intervention technique for prostate radiotherapy using an isodose overlay method combined with soft-tissue-based corrective couch shifts has been proposed previously. This planning study assesses the potential clinical impact of such a correction strategy.

METHODS

10 patients, each with 8-11 on-treatment CT studies (n=97), were assessed using this technique and compared with no intervention, bony anatomy intervention and soft-tissue intervention methods. Each assessment technique used a 4-mm action level for intervention. Outcomes were evaluated using measures of sensitivity, specificity and dosimetric effect, and compared across intervention techniques. Dosimetric effect was defined as the change in dosimetric coverage by the 95% isodose from the no intervention case of an evaluation construct called the verification target volume.

RESULTS

Bony anatomy, soft tissue and dosimetric overlay-based interventions demonstrated sensitivity of 0.56, 0.73 and 1.00 and specificity of 0.64, 0.20 and 0.66, respectively. A detrimental dosimetric effect was shown in 7% of interventions for each technique, with benefit in 30%, 35% and 55% for bony anatomy, soft tissue and dosimetric overlay techniques, respectively.

CONCLUSION

Used in conjunction with soft-tissue-based corrective couch shifts, the dosimetric overlay technique allows effective filtering out of dosimetrically unnecessary interventions, making it more likely that any intervention made will result in improved target volume coverage.

摘要

目的

先前提出了一种使用等剂量叠加方法结合基于软组织的校正床移位的简单剂量引导干预技术,用于前列腺放射治疗。本研究旨在评估这种校正策略的潜在临床影响。

方法

使用该技术评估了 10 名患者(每名患者有 8-11 个治疗期间的 CT 研究,n=97),并与无干预、骨性解剖干预和软组织干预方法进行了比较。每种评估技术均使用 4mm 的干预行动水平。通过敏感性、特异性和剂量学效应评估结果,并在干预技术之间进行比较。剂量学效应定义为评估结构的验证靶区中,95%等剂量线从无干预情况下的剂量覆盖变化。

结果

骨性解剖、软组织和基于剂量学叠加的干预方法的敏感性分别为 0.56、0.73 和 1.00,特异性分别为 0.64、0.20 和 0.66。三种技术的干预中分别有 7%显示出有害的剂量学效应,骨性解剖、软组织和基于剂量学叠加的干预技术分别有 30%、35%和 55%具有获益。

结论

与基于软组织的校正床移位相结合使用,剂量学叠加技术可以有效地过滤掉剂量学上不必要的干预,从而更有可能使任何干预都能提高靶区覆盖。

相似文献

本文引用的文献

9
Low-dose megavoltage cone-beam CT for radiation therapy.用于放射治疗的低剂量兆伏级锥形束CT
Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 2005 Feb 1;61(2):552-60. doi: 10.1016/j.ijrobp.2004.10.011.

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验