Epidemiology Section, School of Public Health, Louisiana State University Health Sciences Center, 1615 Poydras Street, New Orleans, LA 70112, USA.
J Stud Alcohol Drugs. 2011 Mar;72(2):232-9. doi: 10.15288/jsad.2011.72.232.
Evaluations of social norms marketing campaigns to reduce college student drinking have produced conflicting results. This study examines whether the effectiveness of such campaigns may be moderated by on-premise alcohol outlet density in the surrounding community.
Multilevel analyses were conducted of student survey responses (N= 19,838) from 32 U.S. colleges that took part in one of two 4-year randomized, controlled trials completed for the Social Norms Marketing Research Project (SNMRP). In the models, students by year were nested within treatment (n = 16) and control group (n = 16) campuses, which were characterized by the on-premise outlet density in their surrounding community. The moderating effect of outlet density was introduced into the models as an interaction between the treatment effect (i.e., the effect of the social norms marketing campaigns over time) and outlet density. The models were also stratified by campus alcohol outlet density (high vs. low) to examine the effect of the intervention in each type of setting.
There was a significant interaction between the treatment effect and on-premise alcohol outlet density for one of the drinking outcomes targeted by the SNMRP intervention, the number of drinks when partying, and marginal evidence of interaction effects for two other outcomes, maximum recent consumption and a composite drinking scale. In stratified analyses, an intervention effect was observed for three of the four outcomes among students from campuses with lower on-premise alcohol outlet density, whereas no intervention effect was observed among students from campuses with higher on-premise alcohol outlet density.
The findings suggest that the campus alcohol environment moderates the effect of social norms marketing interventions. Social norms marketing intervention may be less effective on campuses with higher densities of on-sale alcohol outlets.
评估旨在减少大学生饮酒的社会规范营销活动的结果相互矛盾。本研究检验了此类活动的有效性是否可能受到周围社区内现场酒精销售点密度的调节。
对参与社会规范营销研究项目(SNMRP)的 32 所美国大学的学生调查答复(N=19838)进行了多层次分析。在模型中,学生按年份被嵌套在处理组(n=16)和对照组(n=16)校园中,这些校园的特点是其周围社区的现场销售点密度。将销售点密度的调节作用作为处理效果(即社会规范营销活动随时间的变化效果)与销售点密度之间的交互作用引入模型中。模型还按校园酒精销售点密度(高或低)进行分层,以检验干预措施在每种设置下的效果。
针对 SNMRP 干预措施针对的饮酒结果之一,即聚会时的饮酒量,处理效果与现场酒精销售点密度之间存在显著的交互作用,并且对于另外两个结果,即最近最大饮酒量和综合饮酒量表,也有边际交互作用的证据。在分层分析中,对于来自酒精销售点密度较低的校园的学生的四个结果中的三个,干预效果明显,而对于来自酒精销售点密度较高的校园的学生,没有观察到干预效果。
这些发现表明,校园酒精环境调节了社会规范营销干预的效果。在酒精销售点密度较高的校园中,社会规范营销干预的效果可能会降低。