Suh H H, Tseng L L
Department of Pharmacology and Toxicology, Medical College of Wisconsin, Milwaukee.
Neuropharmacology. 1990 Mar;29(3):207-14. doi: 10.1016/0028-3908(90)90003-a.
The effects of the intrathecal injection of thiorphan (an inhibitor of enkephalinase inhibitor), bestatin (an inhibitor of aminopeptidase), desipramine (an inhibitor of the uptake of noradrenaline) and fluoxetine (an inhibitor of the uptake of serotonin) on the antinociception induced by beta-endorphin and morphine, administered intracerebroventricularly, were studied in male ICR mice. Antinociceptive effects were assessed by the tail-flick and hot-plate tests. Thiorphan (16 micrograms) and bestatin (16 micrograms), injected intrathecally, potentiated inhibition of the tail-flick response, induced by beta-endorphin but not by morphine administered intracerebroventricularly, whereas desipramine (6 micrograms) and fluoxetine (6 micrograms), injected intrathecally potentiated inhibition of the tail-flick response induced by morphine, but not by beta-endorphin, administered intracerebroventricularly. Thiorphan, bestatin, desipramine or fluoxetine, given intrathecally, did not antagonize inhibition of the hot-plate response, induced by beta-endorphin or morphine administered intracerebroventricularly. The results indicate that inhibition of the tail-flick response, induced by beta-endorphin administered intracerebroventricularly, is mediated by the opioid system, but not by noradrenergic and serotonergic systems in the spinal cord. On the other hand, the inhibition of the tail-flick response, induced by morphine given intracerebroventricularly, is mediated by noradrenergic and serotonergic systems, but not by the opioid system in the spinal cord. The lack of effect of enzyme inhibitors and inhibitors of the uptake of biogenic amines intrathecally on beta-endorphin- and morphine-induced inhibition of the hot-plate response, is due to the supraspinal nature of the nociceptive hot-plate response. The present results further support the hypothesis, proposed previously, that intracerebroventricularly injected beta-endorphin and morphine elicit antinociception by activating different descending inhibitory systems.
在雄性ICR小鼠中,研究了鞘内注射硫磷酰胺(脑啡肽酶抑制剂)、贝司他汀(氨肽酶抑制剂)、地昔帕明(去甲肾上腺素摄取抑制剂)和氟西汀(5-羟色胺摄取抑制剂)对脑室内注射β-内啡肽和吗啡诱导的抗伤害感受的影响。通过甩尾试验和热板试验评估抗伤害感受作用。鞘内注射硫磷酰胺(16微克)和贝司他汀(16微克)增强了β-内啡肽诱导的甩尾反应抑制,但未增强脑室内注射吗啡诱导的甩尾反应抑制;而鞘内注射地昔帕明(6微克)和氟西汀(6微克)增强了吗啡诱导的甩尾反应抑制,但未增强脑室内注射β-内啡肽诱导的甩尾反应抑制。鞘内注射硫磷酰胺、贝司他汀、地昔帕明或氟西汀不会拮抗脑室内注射β-内啡肽或吗啡诱导的热板反应抑制。结果表明,脑室内注射β-内啡肽诱导的甩尾反应抑制由阿片系统介导,而非脊髓中的去甲肾上腺素能和5-羟色胺能系统介导。另一方面,脑室内注射吗啡诱导的甩尾反应抑制由去甲肾上腺素能和5-羟色胺能系统介导,而非脊髓中的阿片系统介导。鞘内注射酶抑制剂和生物胺摄取抑制剂对β-内啡肽和吗啡诱导的热板反应抑制缺乏作用,是由于伤害性热板反应的脊髓上性质。本研究结果进一步支持了先前提出的假说,即脑室内注射β-内啡肽和吗啡通过激活不同的下行抑制系统引发抗伤害感受。