Suppr超能文献

商业周期与工作场所伤害发生率:来自美国的证据

The business cycle and the incidence of workplace injuries: evidence from the U.S.A.

机构信息

National Institute for Occupational Safety and Health (NIOSH), Office of the Director, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC), Washington, DC, USA.

出版信息

J Safety Res. 2011 Feb;42(1):1-8. doi: 10.1016/j.jsr.2010.10.008. Epub 2010 Dec 1.

Abstract

INTRODUCTION

The current study explored the association between the business cycle and the incidence of workplace injuries to identify cyclically sensitive industries and the relative contribution of physical capital and labor utilization within industries.

METHOD

Bureau of Labor Statistics nonfatal injury rates from 1976 through 2007 were examined across five industry sectors with respect to several macroeconomic indicators. Within industries, injury associations with utilization of labor and physical capital over time were tested using time series regression methods.

RESULTS

Pro-cyclical associations between business cycle indicators and injury incidence were observed in mining, construction, and manufacturing but not in agriculture or trade. Physical capital utilization was the highest potential contributor to injuries in mining while labor utilization was the highest potential contributor in construction. In manufacturing each effect had a similar association with injuries.

CONCLUSION

The incidence of workplace injury is associated with the business cycle. However, the degree of association and the mechanisms through with the business cycle affects the incidence of workplace injuries was not the same across industries.

IMPACT ON INDUSTRY

The results suggest that firms in the construction, manufacturing, and mining industries should take additional precautionary safety measures during cyclical upturns. Potential differences among industries in the mechanisms through which the business cycle affects injury incidence suggest different protective strategies for those industries. For example, in construction, additional efforts might be undertaken to ensure workers are adequately trained and not excessively fatigued, while safety procedures continue to be followed even during boom times.

摘要

简介

本研究旨在探讨商业周期与工作场所伤害发生率之间的关系,以确定对周期性敏感的行业,以及各行业中实物资本和劳动力利用的相对贡献。

方法

本研究利用时间序列回归方法,检验了 1976 年至 2007 年期间五个行业部门的非致命伤害率与几个宏观经济指标之间的关系。在各行业内,还检验了随着时间推移,劳动力和实物资本利用与伤害之间的关联。

结果

在采矿业、建筑业和制造业中观察到商业周期指标与伤害发生率之间呈顺周期性关联,但在农业或贸易部门中则没有这种关联。在采矿业中,实物资本利用是导致伤害的最大潜在因素,而在建筑业中,劳动力利用则是导致伤害的最大潜在因素。在制造业中,每个因素与伤害的关联程度相似。

结论

工作场所伤害的发生率与商业周期有关。然而,商业周期影响工作场所伤害发生率的关联程度和机制在不同行业中并不相同。

对行业的影响

研究结果表明,建筑、制造和采矿行业的企业在商业周期上升期间应采取额外的预防安全措施。商业周期影响伤害发生率的机制在不同行业之间存在差异,这表明这些行业需要采取不同的保护策略。例如,在建筑业,可能需要额外努力确保工人得到充分培训,并且不过度疲劳,同时即使在繁荣时期也要继续遵守安全程序。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验