• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

自评精神病症状在抑郁住院患者中的有效性。

The validity of self-rated psychotic symptoms in depressed inpatients.

机构信息

Department of Psychiatry and Psychotherapy, Ludwig-Maximilians-University Munich, Nussbaumstrasse 7, 80336 Munich, Germany.

出版信息

Eur Psychiatry. 2012 Oct;27(7):547-52. doi: 10.1016/j.eurpsy.2011.01.004. Epub 2011 Mar 9.

DOI:10.1016/j.eurpsy.2011.01.004
PMID:21392943
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Self-ratings of psychotic experiences might be biased by depressive symptoms.

METHOD

Data from a large naturalistic multicentre trial on depressed inpatients (n=488) who were assessed on a biweekly basis until discharge were analyzed. Self-rated psychotic symptoms as assessed with the 90-Item Symptom Checklist (SCL-90) were correlated with the SCL-90 total score, the SCL-90 depression score, the Beck Depression Inventory (BDI), the Hamilton Depression Rating Scale 21 item (HAMD-21) total score, the Montgomery Åsberg Depression Rating Scale (MADRS) total score and the clinician-rated paranoid-hallucinatory score of the Association for Methodology and Documentation in Psychiatry (AMDP) scale.

RESULTS

At discharge the SCL-90 psychosis score correlated highest with the SCL-90 depression score (0.78, P<0.001) and with the BDI total score (0.64, P<0.001). Moderate correlations were found for the MADRS (0.34, P<0.001), HAMD (0.37, P<0.001) and AMDP depression score (0.33, P<0.001). Only a weak correlation was found between the SCL-90 psychosis score and the AMDP paranoid-hallucinatory syndrome score (0.15, P<0.001). Linear regression showed that change in self-rated psychotic symptoms over the treatment course was best explained by a change in the SCL-90 depression score (P<0.001). The change in clinician-rated AMDP paranoid-hallucinatory score had lesser influence (P=0.02).

CONCLUSIONS

In depressed patients self-rated psychotic symptoms correlate poorly with clinician-rated psychotic symptoms. Caution is warranted when interpreting results from epidemiological surveys using self-rated psychotic symptom questionnaires as indicators of psychotic symptoms. Depressive symptoms which are highly prevalent in the general population might influence such self-ratings.

摘要

背景

自评的精神病体验可能会受到抑郁症状的影响。

方法

对接受双周评估直至出院的 488 例住院抑郁症患者的大型自然主义多中心试验数据进行了分析。使用 90 项症状清单(SCL-90)自评精神病症状,并与 SCL-90 总分、SCL-90 抑郁得分、贝克抑郁量表(BDI)、汉密尔顿抑郁量表 21 项(HAMD-21)总分、蒙哥马利抑郁评定量表(MADRS)总分以及精神病学方法和文献协会(AMDP)评定的临床医生评定的偏执-幻觉评分相关。

结果

在出院时,SCL-90 精神病评分与 SCL-90 抑郁评分(0.78,P<0.001)和 BDI 总分(0.64,P<0.001)相关性最高。与 MADRS(0.34,P<0.001)、HAMD(0.37,P<0.001)和 AMDP 抑郁评分(0.33,P<0.001)呈中度相关。SCL-90 精神病评分与 AMDP 偏执-幻觉综合征评分仅呈弱相关(0.15,P<0.001)。线性回归显示,治疗过程中自评精神病症状的变化主要由 SCL-90 抑郁评分的变化来解释(P<0.001)。临床医生评定的 AMDP 偏执-幻觉评分的变化影响较小(P=0.02)。

结论

在抑郁症患者中,自评精神病症状与临床医生评定的精神病症状相关性较差。在使用自评精神病症状问卷作为精神病症状指标的流行病学调查中,解释结果时需要谨慎。在普通人群中普遍存在的高度流行的抑郁症状可能会影响这种自评。

相似文献

1
The validity of self-rated psychotic symptoms in depressed inpatients.自评精神病症状在抑郁住院患者中的有效性。
Eur Psychiatry. 2012 Oct;27(7):547-52. doi: 10.1016/j.eurpsy.2011.01.004. Epub 2011 Mar 9.
2
Comparison of self-rated and clinician-rated measures of depressive symptoms: a naturalistic study.抑郁症状自评与临床医生评定测量方法的比较:一项自然主义研究。
Psychol Psychother. 2004 Sep;77(Pt 3):353-61. doi: 10.1348/1476083041839349.
3
Self- and clinician-rated Montgomery-Asberg Depression Rating Scale: evaluation in clinical practice.患者自评和临床医生评定的蒙哥马利-阿斯伯格抑郁评定量表:在临床实践中的评估。
J Affect Disord. 2010 Mar;121(3):268-72. doi: 10.1016/j.jad.2009.06.037. Epub 2009 Aug 5.
4
The relationship of demographic, clinical, cognitive and personality variables to the discrepancy between self and clinician rated depression.人口统计学、临床、认知和人格变量与自我和临床医生评定的抑郁程度之间的差异的关系。
J Affect Disord. 2010 Jul;124(1-2):202-6. doi: 10.1016/j.jad.2009.11.011. Epub 2009 Dec 9.
5
A factor analytic comparison of three commonly used depression scales (HAMD, MADRS, BDI) in a large sample of depressed inpatients.在一个大型抑郁症住院患者样本中,对三种常用抑郁量表(HAMD、MADRS、BDI)进行因子分析比较。
BMC Psychiatry. 2023 Jul 28;23(1):548. doi: 10.1186/s12888-023-05038-7.
6
A comparison of the Major Depression Inventory (MDI) and the Beck Depression Inventory (BDI) in severely depressed patients.重性抑郁障碍患者中 Major Depression Inventory(MDI)与 Beck Depression Inventory(BDI)的对比。
Int J Psychiatry Clin Pract. 2011 Mar;15(1):56-61. doi: 10.3109/13651501.2010.507870. Epub 2010 Sep 22.
7
IDS-C and IDS-sr: psychometric properties in depressed in-patients.IDS-C和IDS-sr:抑郁症住院患者的心理测量特性
J Affect Disord. 1999 Dec;56(2-3):95-101. doi: 10.1016/s0165-0327(99)00055-5.
8
[Investigation of episode-characteristics of unipolar psychotic depression].[单相精神病性抑郁症发作特征的研究]
Nervenarzt. 2000 May;71(5):393-400. doi: 10.1007/s001150050574.
9
Clinical validation of the Psychotic Depression Assessment Scale (PDAS) against independent global severity ratings in older adults.老年患者精神病性抑郁评估量表(PDAS)与独立的全球严重程度评定量表的临床验证。
Acta Neuropsychiatr. 2018 Aug;30(4):203-208. doi: 10.1017/neu.2018.2. Epub 2018 Mar 4.
10
The Symptom Checklist-core depression (SCL-CD6) scale: psychometric properties of a brief six item scale for the assessment of depression.症状清单-核心抑郁(SCL-CD6)量表:一种用于评估抑郁的简短六项目量表的心理测量特性。
Scand J Public Health. 2014 Feb;42(1):82-8. doi: 10.1177/1403494813500591. Epub 2013 Aug 27.

引用本文的文献

1
Comprehensive Psychopathological Assessment Based on the Association for Methodology and Documentation in Psychiatry (AMDP) System: Development, Methodological Foundation, Application in Clinical Routine, and Research.基于精神病学方法与文献协会(AMDP)系统的综合精神病理学评估:发展、方法学基础、在临床常规中的应用及研究
Front Psychiatry. 2017 Apr 7;8:45. doi: 10.3389/fpsyt.2017.00045. eCollection 2017.
2
Psychotic and schizotypal symptoms in non-psychotic patients with obsessive-compulsive disorder.患有强迫症的非精神病患者的精神病性和分裂型症状
BMC Psychiatry. 2015 May 28;15:121. doi: 10.1186/s12888-015-0502-1.
3
Rating scales measuring the severity of psychotic depression.
评估精神病性抑郁严重程度的评定量表。
Acta Psychiatr Scand. 2015 Nov;132(5):335-44. doi: 10.1111/acps.12449. Epub 2015 May 27.
4
DSM-5 reviewed from different angles: goal attainment, rationality, use of evidence, consequences--part 1: general aspects and paradigmatic discussion of depressive disorders.从不同角度审视《精神疾病诊断与统计手册》第五版:目标达成、合理性、证据运用、后果——第1部分:抑郁症的一般方面及范例性讨论
Eur Arch Psychiatry Clin Neurosci. 2015 Feb;265(1):5-18. doi: 10.1007/s00406-014-0520-x. Epub 2014 Aug 14.