Suppr超能文献

抑郁症状自评与临床医生评定测量方法的比较:一项自然主义研究。

Comparison of self-rated and clinician-rated measures of depressive symptoms: a naturalistic study.

作者信息

Dorz Stella, Borgherini Giuseppe, Conforti Donatella, Scarso Caterina, Magni Guido

机构信息

Affective Disorders Unit, Casa di Cura Parco dei Tigli, Padova, Italy.

出版信息

Psychol Psychother. 2004 Sep;77(Pt 3):353-61. doi: 10.1348/1476083041839349.

Abstract

In order to assess the concordance between self-rating and clinician's assessment tools of depression, as well as factors involved in the differences between auto and hetero evaluation, 198 depressed in-patients were assessed at admission and at discharge using the Montgomery Asberg Depression Rating Scale (10-item version, MADRS) and the self-rating scale Symptoms CheckList (90-item version, SCL-90). We found that about 18% of patients overestimated and about 15% underestimated their depressive symptomatology (SCL-90 depression subscale) relative to the psychiatrist's assessment. Logistic regression analysis showed that the presence of personality disorders and previous history of psychiatric disorders predicted the overestimating group. Discriminant analysis showed that approximately 75% of participants were correctly classified when previous history of psychiatric disorders, presence of personality disorders and age were entered separately into the equation.

摘要

为了评估抑郁症自评工具与临床医生评估工具之间的一致性,以及自评与他评差异所涉及的因素,我们使用蒙哥马利-阿斯伯格抑郁评定量表(10项版本,MADRS)和自评量表症状自评量表(90项版本,SCL-90),对198名抑郁症住院患者在入院时和出院时进行了评估。我们发现,相对于精神科医生的评估,约18%的患者高估了自己的抑郁症状(SCL-90抑郁分量表),约15%的患者低估了自己的抑郁症状。逻辑回归分析表明,人格障碍的存在和既往精神疾病史可预测高估组。判别分析表明,当将既往精神疾病史、人格障碍的存在和年龄分别纳入方程时,约75%的参与者被正确分类。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验