• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

利用 HMO 为医疗补助人群服务:对利用有何影响,HMO 的类型是否重要?

Using HMOs to serve the Medicaid population: what are the effects on utilization and does the type of HMO matter?

机构信息

Department of Health Policy and Management, Bloomberg School of Public Health, Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, MD 21205, USA.

出版信息

Health Econ. 2011 Apr;20(4):446-60. doi: 10.1002/hec.1602.

DOI:10.1002/hec.1602
PMID:21394815
Abstract

States have increasingly used Health Maintenance Organizations (HMOs) to provide medical services to the Medicaid population. However, the effects of these initiatives on total health-care expenses, the mix of utilization, and access to care remain unclear. We examine the effect of changes in Medicaid HMO penetration between 1996 and 2002 on these outcomes using data for the nonelderly Medicaid population in the Community Tracking Study's Household Survey. We develop market-level measures of Medicaid HMO penetration from CMS and InterStudy data, distinguish whether the HMOs specialize in serving the Medicaid population, and use a market fixed-effects model to focus on changes in HMO penetration rates over time. Although limited by imprecise estimates, we find some evidence that utilization and access are related to the market penetration rates of commercial and Medicaid-dominant HMOs, but the pattern of results we observe does not appear to be consistent with welfare improvements.

摘要

各州越来越多地使用健康维护组织(HMO)为医疗补助人群提供医疗服务。然而,这些举措对总医疗费用、利用情况的组合以及获得医疗服务的影响仍不清楚。我们使用社区追踪研究家庭调查中的非老年医疗补助人口数据,考察了 1996 年至 2002 年间医疗补助 HMO 普及率变化对这些结果的影响。我们从 CMS 和 InterStudy 数据中制定了医疗补助 HMO 普及率的市场水平衡量标准,区分了 HMO 是否专门为医疗补助人群服务,并使用市场固定效应模型来关注 HMO 普及率随时间的变化。尽管受到估计不精确的限制,但我们发现一些证据表明,利用情况和获得医疗服务的机会与商业和 Medicaid 主导型 HMO 的市场普及率有关,但我们观察到的结果模式似乎不符合福利改善。

相似文献

1
Using HMOs to serve the Medicaid population: what are the effects on utilization and does the type of HMO matter?利用 HMO 为医疗补助人群服务:对利用有何影响,HMO 的类型是否重要?
Health Econ. 2011 Apr;20(4):446-60. doi: 10.1002/hec.1602.
2
Has the increase in HMO enrollment within the Medicaid population changed the pattern of health service use and expenditures?医疗补助人群中健康维护组织(HMO)参保人数的增加是否改变了医疗服务使用模式和支出情况?
Med Care. 2003 Jul;41(7 Suppl):III24-III34. doi: 10.1097/01.MLR.0000076021.02410.DB.
3
Medicaid HMO penetration and its mix: did increased penetration affect physician participation in urban markets?医疗补助健康维护组织(HMO)的渗透率及其构成:渗透率的提高是否影响了城市市场中医师的参与度?
Health Serv Res. 2008 Feb;43(1 Pt 2):363-83. doi: 10.1111/j.1475-6773.2007.00763.x.
4
Hospital expenditures and utilization: the impact of HMOs.医院支出与利用情况:健康维护组织的影响
Am J Manag Care. 1999 Jul;5(7):853-64.
5
Do HMOs make a difference? Introduction.健康维护组织(HMOs)有作用吗?引言。
Inquiry. 1999;36(4):374-7.
6
Does Medicaid managed care market penetration impact provider participation, costs, utilization, and access?医疗补助管理式医疗的市场渗透率会影响医疗服务提供者的参与度、成本、利用率和可及性吗?
Find Brief. 2010 Sep;13(4):1-4.
7
Do HMOs make a difference? Access to health care.健康维护组织(HMOs)有作用吗?获得医疗保健服务的情况。
Inquiry. 1999;36(4):390-9.
8
Medicaid and managed health care: enrollment in HMOs and other alternative health systems.医疗补助与管理式医疗保健:加入健康维护组织及其他替代医疗系统的情况。
GHAA J. 1987 Summer;8(1):49-62.
9
An opportunity for HMOs to use marketing to increase enrollee satisfaction.健康维护组织利用营销提高参保人满意度的契机。
Manag Care. 2001 Jan;10(1):38-9, 43-5, 49-52 passim.
10
Serving distinct populations: performance in Medicaid HMOs and commercial HMOs.服务不同人群:医疗补助健康维护组织和商业健康维护组织的表现。
Health Care Manag (Frederick). 2011 Oct-Dec;30(4):301-12. doi: 10.1097/HCM.0b013e3182350f6f.

引用本文的文献

1
Effects of Medicaid managed care on early detection of cancer: Evidence from mandatory Medicaid managed care program in Pennsylvania.医疗补助管理式医疗对癌症早期检测的影响:来自宾夕法尼亚州强制性医疗补助管理式医疗计划的证据。
Health Serv Res. 2024 Oct;59(5):e14348. doi: 10.1111/1475-6773.14348. Epub 2024 Jul 3.
2
State-Level Variation in Medicaid Managed Care Enrollment and Specialty Care for Publicly Insured Children.州级层面的医疗补助管理式医疗参保率和公众保险儿童专科护理的差异。
JAMA Netw Open. 2023 Oct 2;6(10):e2336415. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2023.36415.
3
Medicaid prevalence and opioid use disorder treatment access disparities.
医疗补助的普及程度和阿片类药物使用障碍治疗机会的差异。
Health Serv Res. 2022 Apr;57(2):422-429. doi: 10.1111/1475-6773.13920. Epub 2021 Dec 18.
4
Racial and Ethnic Differences in Managed Care Enrollment Among US Children.美国儿童在管理式医疗参保中的种族和民族差异。
JAMA Netw Open. 2021 Apr 1;4(4):e214162. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2021.4162.
5
Medicaid managed care and preventable emergency department visits in the United States.美国的医疗补助管理式医疗和可预防的急诊就诊。
PLoS One. 2020 Oct 29;15(10):e0240603. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0240603. eCollection 2020.
6
Association of Medicaid-Focused or Commercial Medicaid Managed Care Plan Type With Outpatient and Acute Care.医疗补助重点计划或商业医疗补助管理式医疗计划类型与门诊和急性护理的关联。
JAMA Intern Med. 2020 Dec 1;180(12):1672-1679. doi: 10.1001/jamainternmed.2020.5408.
7
Is enrollment in a Medicaid health maintenance organization associated with less preventable hospitalizations?参加医疗补助健康维护组织是否与较少的可预防住院率相关?
Prev Med Rep. 2019 Jul 26;16:100964. doi: 10.1016/j.pmedr.2019.100964. eCollection 2019 Dec.
8
Breast and Cervical Cancer Screening Among Medicaid Beneficiaries: The Role of Physician Payment and Managed Care.医疗补助受益人群的乳腺癌和宫颈癌筛查:医生薪酬和管理式医疗的作用。
Med Care Res Rev. 2020 Feb;77(1):34-45. doi: 10.1177/1077558718771123. Epub 2018 May 4.
9
A Leak in the Lifeboat: The effect of Medicaid managed care on the vitality of safety-net hospitals.救生艇上的漏洞:医疗补助管理式医疗对安全网医院活力的影响
J Regul Econ. 2016 Dec;50(3):251-270. doi: 10.1007/s11149-016-9312-8. Epub 2016 Dec 18.
10
Length of Stay and Inpatient Costs Under Medicaid Managed Care in Florida.佛罗里达州医疗补助管理式医疗下的住院时长及住院费用
Inquiry. 2015 Oct 14;52. doi: 10.1177/0046958015610762. Print 2015.