Department of Medicine and Cardiac Arrhythmia Service, Massachusetts General Hospital Heart Center, Boston, Massachusetts, USA.
Heart Rhythm. 2011 Jul;8(7):994-1000. doi: 10.1016/j.hrthm.2011.02.033. Epub 2011 Mar 10.
Pulmonary vein isolation (PVI) is recognized as a potentially curative treatment for atrial fibrillation (AF). Ablation of complex fractionated atrial electrograms (CFAEs) in addition to PVI has been advocated as a means to improve procedural outcomes, but the benefit remains unclear.
This study sought t synthesize the available data testing the incremental benefit of adding CFAE ablation to PVI.
We performed a meta-analysis of controlled studies comparing the effect of PVI with CFAE ablation vs. PVI alone in patients with paroxysmal and nonparoxysmal AF.
Of the 481 reports identified, 8 studies met our inclusion criteria. There was a statistically significant increase in freedom from atrial tachyarrhythmia (AT) with the addition of CFAE ablation (relative risk [RR] 1.15, P = .03). In the 5 reports of nonparoxysmal AF (3 randomized controlled trials, 1 controlled clinical trial, and 1 trial using matched historical controls), addition of CFAE ablation resulted in a statistically significant increase in freedom from AT (n = 112 of 181 [62%] for PVI+CFAE vs. n = 84 of 179 [47%] for PVI alone; RR 1.32, P = .02). In trials of paroxysmal AF (3 randomized controlled trials and 1 trial using matched historical controls), addition of CFAE ablation did not result in a statistically significant increase in freedom from AT (n = 131 of 166 [79%] for PVI+CFAE vs. n = 122 of 164 [74%] for PVI alone; RR 1.04, P = .52).
In these studies of patients with nonparoxysmal AF, addition of CFAE ablation to PVI results in greater improvement in freedom from AF. No additional benefit of this combined approach was observed in patients with paroxysmal AF.
肺静脉隔离(PVI)被认为是治疗心房颤动(AF)的潜在治愈方法。除 PVI 外,消融复杂碎裂心房电图(CFAE)也被提倡用于改善手术结果,但获益仍不清楚。
本研究旨在综合分析评估 PVI 联合 CFAE 消融术与单纯 PVI 术治疗阵发性和非阵发性 AF 的疗效差异。
我们对比较 PVI 联合 CFAE 消融术与单纯 PVI 术治疗阵发性和非阵发性 AF 患者的对照研究进行了荟萃分析。
在 481 份报告中,有 8 项研究符合我们的纳入标准。与单纯 PVI 相比,PVI 联合 CFAE 消融术可显著提高无房性快速性心律失常(AT)的发生率(相对危险度[RR]1.15,P=0.03)。在 5 项非阵发性 AF 报告(3 项随机对照试验、1 项对照临床试验和 1 项采用匹配历史对照的试验)中,PVI 联合 CFAE 消融术可显著提高无 AT 的发生率(PVI+CFAE 组 181 例中有 112 例[62%],PVI 组 179 例中有 84 例[47%];RR 1.32,P=0.02)。在阵发性 AF 试验(3 项随机对照试验和 1 项采用匹配历史对照的试验)中,PVI 联合 CFAE 消融术并不能显著提高无 AT 的发生率(PVI+CFAE 组 166 例中有 131 例[79%],PVI 组 164 例中有 122 例[74%];RR 1.04,P=0.52)。
在这些非阵发性 AF 患者的研究中,PVI 联合 CFAE 消融术可显著提高 AF 无复发率。在阵发性 AF 患者中,这种联合方法没有额外获益。