Suppr超能文献

肺静脉隔离术联合辅助治疗心房颤动的系统评价和荟萃分析。

Pulmonary vein isolation plus adjunctive therapy for the treatment of atrial fibrillation: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

机构信息

Department of Internal Medicine, Penn State Hershey Medical Center, 500 University Drive, Hershey, PA, 17033, USA.

Division of Cardiology, Penn State Hershey Medical Center, Heart and Vascular Institute, Hershey, PA, USA.

出版信息

J Interv Card Electrophysiol. 2024 Apr;67(3):523-537. doi: 10.1007/s10840-023-01609-6. Epub 2023 Aug 4.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Pulmonary vein isolation (PVI) is the primary technique for ablation of atrial fibrillation (AF). It is unclear whether adjunctive therapies in addition to PVI can reduce atrial arrhythmia recurrence (AAR) compared to PVI alone in patients with AF.

METHODS

A meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials comparing PVI plus an adjunctive therapy (autonomic modulation, linear ablation, non-pulmonary vein trigger ablation, epicardial PVI [hybrid ablation], or left atrial substrate modification) to PVI alone was conducted. The primary outcome was AAR. Cumulative odd's ratios (OR) and 95% confidence intervals (CI) were calculated for each treatment type.

RESULTS

Forty-six trials were identified that included 8,500 participants. The mean age (± standard deviation) was 60.2 (±4.1) years, and 27.2% of all patients were female. The mean follow-up time was 14.6 months. PVI plus autonomic modulation and PVI plus hybrid ablation were associated with a relative 53.1% (OR 0.47; 95% CI 0.32 to 0.69; p < 0.001) and 59.1% (OR 0.41; 95% CI 0.23 to 0.75; p = 0.003) reduction in AAR, respectively, compared to PVI alone. All categories had at least moderate interstudy heterogeneity except for hybrid ablation.

CONCLUSION

Adjunctive autonomic modulation and epicardial PVI may improve the effectiveness of PVI. Larger, multi-center randomized controlled trials are needed to evaluate the efficacy of these therapies.

摘要

背景

肺静脉隔离(PVI)是治疗心房颤动(AF)的主要消融技术。目前尚不清楚在 AF 患者中,与单独 PVI 相比,除 PVI 之外的附加治疗是否可以降低心房心律失常复发(AAR)。

方法

对比较 PVI 加辅助治疗(自主神经调节、线性消融、非肺静脉触发消融、心外膜 PVI[杂交消融]或左心房基质修饰)与单独 PVI 的随机对照试验进行了荟萃分析。主要结局是 AAR。为每种治疗类型计算累积奇数比(OR)和 95%置信区间(CI)。

结果

确定了 46 项试验,共纳入 8500 名参与者。平均年龄(±标准差)为 60.2(±4.1)岁,所有患者中有 27.2%为女性。平均随访时间为 14.6 个月。与单独 PVI 相比,PVI 加自主神经调节和 PVI 加杂交消融分别与 AAR 降低 53.1%(OR 0.47;95%CI 0.32 至 0.69;p<0.001)和 59.1%(OR 0.41;95%CI 0.23 至 0.75;p=0.003)相关。除杂交消融外,所有类别均至少存在中度异质性。

结论

附加自主神经调节和心外膜 PVI 可能提高 PVI 的有效性。需要更大规模、多中心的随机对照试验来评估这些治疗的疗效。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验