• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

挥鞭样损伤患者在疼痛、功能或预后方面与其他非特异性颈部疼痛患者有差异吗?

Do whiplash patients differ from other patients with non-specific neck pain regarding pain, function or prognosis?

作者信息

Verhagen Arianne P, Lewis Martyn, Schellingerhout Jasper M, Heymans Martijn W, Dziedzic Krysia, de Vet Henrica C W, Koes Bart W

机构信息

Erasmus MC, Department General Practice, PO Box 2040, 3000 CA Rotterdam, The Netherlands.

出版信息

Man Ther. 2011 Oct;16(5):456-62. doi: 10.1016/j.math.2011.02.009. Epub 2011 Mar 13.

DOI:10.1016/j.math.2011.02.009
PMID:21406332
Abstract

We evaluated whether patients with self-reported whiplash differed in perceived pain, functional limitation and prognosis from patients with other painful neck complaints. Data from three Dutch trials and an English trial were used all evaluating conservative treatment in neck pain patients in primary care. All patients had non-specific neck pain. Information on any trauma or injury came from self-report at baseline. We compared frequencies of baseline variables and outcome at short-term and long term for whiplash and non-trauma neck pain patients separately. The total study population consisted of 804 neck pain patients. Of these patients 133 reported (16.5%) that an injury was the cause of their neck pain. In all trials there were 17-18% more male patients in the whiplash group. At follow-up pain decreased between 12 and 28%, function 10%, and 25-50% of patients recovered in all trials. Post-treatment improvements in pain, function and recovery were comparable between whiplash and non-trauma patients. We also found no different prognostic factors between whiplash and non-trauma patients. Overall we found in a population with mild to moderate pain no clinically relevant differences between patients with self-reported whiplash and patients with other painful neck complaints. The findings suggest that whiplash patients with mild to moderate pain should not be considered a specific subgroup of patients with non-specific neck pain.

摘要

我们评估了自我报告有挥鞭样损伤的患者与其他颈部疼痛患者在疼痛感知、功能受限及预后方面是否存在差异。使用了来自三项荷兰试验和一项英国试验的数据,所有这些试验均评估了初级保健中颈部疼痛患者的保守治疗。所有患者均患有非特异性颈部疼痛。关于任何创伤或损伤的信息来自基线时的自我报告。我们分别比较了挥鞭样损伤患者和非创伤性颈部疼痛患者基线变量的频率以及短期和长期的结局。总研究人群包括804名颈部疼痛患者。其中133名患者(16.5%)报告称损伤是其颈部疼痛的原因。在所有试验中,挥鞭样损伤组男性患者比其他组多17 - 18%。在随访中,所有试验中疼痛减轻了12%至28%,功能改善了10%,25%至50%的患者康复。挥鞭样损伤患者和非创伤性患者在治疗后疼痛、功能及恢复方面的改善相当。我们还发现挥鞭样损伤患者和非创伤性患者之间不存在不同的预后因素。总体而言,我们发现在轻度至中度疼痛人群中,自我报告有挥鞭样损伤的患者与其他颈部疼痛患者之间不存在临床相关差异。这些发现表明,轻度至中度疼痛的挥鞭样损伤患者不应被视为非特异性颈部疼痛患者中的一个特定亚组。

相似文献

1
Do whiplash patients differ from other patients with non-specific neck pain regarding pain, function or prognosis?挥鞭样损伤患者在疼痛、功能或预后方面与其他非特异性颈部疼痛患者有差异吗?
Man Ther. 2011 Oct;16(5):456-62. doi: 10.1016/j.math.2011.02.009. Epub 2011 Mar 13.
2
Clinical assessment of prognostic factors for long-term pain and handicap after whiplash injury: a 1-year prospective study.挥鞭样损伤后长期疼痛和功能障碍预后因素的临床评估:一项为期1年的前瞻性研究。
Eur J Neurol. 2008 Nov;15(11):1222-30. doi: 10.1111/j.1468-1331.2008.02301.x. Epub 2008 Sep 18.
3
Delayed recovery in patients with whiplash-associated disorders.颈背部挥鞭伤相关性疾病患者的恢复期延长。
Injury. 2012 Jul;43(7):1141-7. doi: 10.1016/j.injury.2012.03.006. Epub 2012 Apr 2.
4
Chronic neck pain. An epidemiological, psychological and SPECT study with emphasis on whiplash-associated disorders.慢性颈痛。一项流行病学、心理学及单光子发射计算机断层扫描研究,重点关注挥鞭样损伤相关疾病。
Acta Orthop Suppl. 2006 Feb;77(320):preceding 1, 3-33.
5
Pain and Disability in the Jaw and Neck Region following Whiplash Trauma.挥鞭样损伤后颌面部及颈部区域的疼痛与功能障碍
J Dent Res. 2016 Sep;95(10):1155-60. doi: 10.1177/0022034516653598. Epub 2016 Jun 15.
6
Catastrophizing and causal beliefs in whiplash.挥鞭伤中的灾难化思维与因果信念
Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2008 Oct 15;33(22):2427-33; discussion 2434. doi: 10.1097/BRS.0b013e318183c6ca.
7
Prognosis after whiplash injury: where to from here? Discussion paper 4.挥鞭样损伤预后:前路在何方?讨论文件 4。
Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2011 Dec 1;36(25 Suppl):S330-4. doi: 10.1097/BRS.0b013e3182388523.
8
The risk assessment score in acute whiplash injury predicts outcome and reflects biopsychosocial factors.急性颈挥鞭伤的风险评估评分可预测结局,并反映生物-心理-社会因素。
Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2011 Dec 1;36(25 Suppl):S263-7. doi: 10.1097/BRS.0b013e31823881d6.
9
Reduced head steadiness in whiplash compared with non-traumatic neck pain.与非创伤性颈部疼痛相比,挥鞭样损伤的头部稳定性降低。
J Rehabil Med. 2010 Jan;42(1):35-41. doi: 10.2340/16501977-0484.
10
Neuropsychological functioning and MMPI-2 profiles in chronic neck pain: a comparison of whiplash and non-traumatic groups.慢性颈部疼痛患者的神经心理功能与明尼苏达多相人格调查表-2剖面图:鞭打损伤组与非创伤组的比较
J Clin Exp Neuropsychol. 2005 Feb;27(2):151-63. doi: 10.1080/13803390490515487.

引用本文的文献

1
The nosological classification of whiplash-associated disorder: a narrative review.挥鞭样损伤相关障碍的疾病分类:一篇叙述性综述。
J Can Chiropr Assoc. 2021 Apr;65(1):76-93.
2
Prediction models of health-related quality of life in different neck pain conditions: a cross-sectional study.不同颈部疼痛状况下健康相关生活质量的预测模型:一项横断面研究。
Patient Prefer Adherence. 2018 May 1;12:657-666. doi: 10.2147/PPA.S162702. eCollection 2018.
3
Subgroups based on thermal and pressure pain thresholds in women with chronic whiplash display differences in clinical presentation - an explorative study.
基于慢性颈痛女性的热痛和压痛阈值的亚组显示出临床表型的差异 - 一项探索性研究。
J Pain Res. 2012;5:511-21. doi: 10.2147/JPR.S37062. Epub 2012 Nov 8.
4
Physiotherapy rehabilitation for whiplash associated disorder II: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomised controlled trials.挥鞭样损伤相关疾病II的物理治疗康复:随机对照试验的系统评价与荟萃分析
BMJ Open. 2011 Nov 14;1(2):e000265. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2011-000265. Print 2011.
5
An increased response to experimental muscle pain is related to psychological status in women with chronic non-traumatic neck-shoulder pain.对实验性肌肉疼痛的反应增加与慢性非创伤性颈肩痛女性的心理状态有关。
BMC Musculoskelet Disord. 2011 Oct 12;12:230. doi: 10.1186/1471-2474-12-230.