Rushton Alison, Wright Chris, Heneghan Nicola, Eveleigh Gillian, Calvert Melanie, Freemantle Nick
School of Health and Population Sciences, College of Medicine and Dentistry, University of Birmingham, Edgbaston, Birmingham, UK.
BMJ Open. 2011 Nov 14;1(2):e000265. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2011-000265. Print 2011.
Objective To evaluate effectiveness of physiotherapy management in patients experiencing whiplash associated disorder II, on clinically relevant outcomes in the short and longer term. Design Systematic review and meta-analysis. Two reviewers independently searched information sources, assessed studies for inclusion, evaluated risk of bias and extracted data. A third reviewer mediated disagreement. Assessment of risk of bias was tabulated across included trials. Quantitative synthesis was conducted on comparable outcomes across trials with similar interventions. Meta-analyses compared effect sizes, with random effects as primary analyses. Data sources Predefined terms were employed to search electronic databases. Additional studies were identified from key journals, reference lists, authors and experts. Eligibility criteria for selecting studies Randomised controlled trials (RCTs) published in English before 31 December 2010 evaluating physiotherapy management of patients (>16 years), experiencing whiplash associated disorder II. Any physiotherapy intervention was included, when compared with other types of management, placebo/sham, or no intervention. Measurements reported on ≥1 outcome from the domains within the international classification of function, disability and health, were included. Results 21 RCTs (2126 participants, 9 countries) were included. Interventions were categorised as active physiotherapy or a specific physiotherapy intervention. 20/21 trials were evaluated as high risk of bias and one as unclear. 1395 participants were incorporated in the meta-analyses on 12 trials. In evaluating short term outcome in the acute/sub-acute stage, there was some evidence that active physiotherapy intervention reduces pain and improves range of movement, and that a specific physiotherapy intervention may reduce pain. However, moderate/considerable heterogeneity suggested that treatments may differ in nature or effect in different trial patients. Differences between participants, interventions and trial designs limited potential meta-analyses. Conclusions Inconclusive evidence exists for the effectiveness of physiotherapy management for whiplash associated disorder II. There is potential benefit for improving range of movement and pain short term through active physiotherapy, and for improving pain through a specific physiotherapy intervention.
目的 评估物理治疗管理对Ⅱ型挥鞭样损伤相关疾病患者短期和长期临床相关结局的有效性。设计 系统评价和荟萃分析。两名评价者独立检索信息来源、评估纳入研究、评价偏倚风险并提取数据。第三名评价者协调分歧。对纳入试验的偏倚风险评估进行列表统计。对采用相似干预措施的试验中的可比结局进行定量综合分析。荟萃分析比较效应量,以随机效应模型作为主要分析方法。数据来源 使用预定义术语检索电子数据库。从主要期刊、参考文献列表、作者和专家处识别其他研究。选择研究的纳入标准 2010年12月31日前发表的英文随机对照试验(RCT),评估对Ⅱ型挥鞭样损伤相关疾病患者(年龄>16岁)的物理治疗管理。与其他类型的管理、安慰剂/假治疗或不干预相比,纳入任何物理治疗干预措施。纳入在国际功能、残疾和健康分类领域中报告的≥1项结局的测量数据。结果 纳入21项RCT(2126名参与者,9个国家)。干预措施分为主动物理治疗或特定物理治疗干预。21项试验中有20项被评估为高偏倚风险,1项为不清楚。12项试验中的1395名参与者纳入荟萃分析。在评估急性/亚急性期的短期结局时,有一些证据表明主动物理治疗干预可减轻疼痛并改善活动范围,且特定物理治疗干预可能减轻疼痛。然而,中度/相当大的异质性表明,不同试验中的治疗方法在性质或效果上可能存在差异。参与者、干预措施和试验设计之间的差异限制了潜在的荟萃分析。结论 关于物理治疗管理对Ⅱ型挥鞭样损伤相关疾病有效性的证据尚无定论。主动物理治疗在短期内改善活动范围和疼痛方面可能有益,特定物理治疗干预在改善疼痛方面可能有益