• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

相似文献

1
How does early detection by screening affect disease progression? Modeling estimated benefits in prostate cancer screening.早期筛查如何影响疾病进展?前列腺癌筛查中模型估计的获益。
Med Decis Making. 2011 Jul-Aug;31(4):550-8. doi: 10.1177/0272989X10396717. Epub 2011 Mar 15.
2
Prostate-specific antigen screening in the United States vs in the European Randomized Study of Screening for Prostate Cancer-Rotterdam.美国与欧洲前列腺癌筛查随机研究-鹿特丹的前列腺特异性抗原筛查比较。
J Natl Cancer Inst. 2010 Mar 3;102(5):352-5. doi: 10.1093/jnci/djp533. Epub 2010 Feb 8.
3
Lead time and overdiagnosis in prostate-specific antigen screening: importance of methods and context.前列腺特异性抗原筛查中的提前期和过度诊断:方法及背景的重要性
J Natl Cancer Inst. 2009 Mar 18;101(6):374-83. doi: 10.1093/jnci/djp001. Epub 2009 Mar 10.
4
Do Treatment Differences between Arms Affect the Main Outcome of ERSPC Rotterdam?手臂之间的治疗差异是否会影响 ERSPC Rotterdam 的主要结局?
J Urol. 2015 Aug;194(2):336-42. doi: 10.1016/j.juro.2015.02.045. Epub 2015 Feb 16.
5
Gleason score, age and screening: modeling dedifferentiation in prostate cancer.格里森评分、年龄与筛查:前列腺癌去分化建模
Int J Cancer. 2006 Nov 15;119(10):2366-71. doi: 10.1002/ijc.22158.
6
7
Could Differences in Treatment Between Trial Arms Explain the Reduction in Prostate Cancer Mortality in the European Randomized Study of Screening for Prostate Cancer?试验组间治疗差异能否解释前列腺癌筛查的欧洲随机研究中前列腺癌死亡率的降低?
Eur Urol. 2019 Jun;75(6):1015-1022. doi: 10.1016/j.eururo.2019.03.010. Epub 2019 Mar 28.
8
Screening for prostate cancer with the prostate-specific antigen test: a review of current evidence.用前列腺特异性抗原检测进行前列腺癌筛查:当前证据回顾。
JAMA. 2014 Mar 19;311(11):1143-9. doi: 10.1001/jama.2014.2085.
9
Detection of prostate cancer: the impact of the European Randomized Study of Screening for Prostate Cancer (ERSPC).前列腺癌的检测:欧洲前列腺癌筛查随机研究(ERSPC)的影响
Can J Urol. 2005 Feb;12 Suppl 1:2-6; discussion 92-3.
10
Landmarks in prostate cancer screening.前列腺癌筛查的里程碑。
BJU Int. 2012 Oct;110 Suppl 1:3-7. doi: 10.1111/j.1464-410X.2012.011428.x.

引用本文的文献

1
Cost effectiveness analysis of prostate cancer screening strategies in Germany: A microsimulation study.德国前列腺癌筛查策略的成本效益分析:一项微观模拟研究。
Int J Cancer. 2025 Oct 15;157(8):1662-1679. doi: 10.1002/ijc.35513. Epub 2025 Jul 16.
2
Strong association between reduction of late-stage cancers and reduction of cancer-specific mortality in meta-regression of randomized screening trials across multiple cancer types.在多个癌症类型的随机筛查试验的荟萃回归中,晚期癌症的减少与癌症特异性死亡率的降低之间存在很强的关联。
J Med Screen. 2024 Dec;31(4):211-222. doi: 10.1177/09691413241256744. Epub 2024 May 26.
3
Clinical performance and utility: A microsimulation model to inform the design of screening trials for a multi-cancer early detection test.临床性能和实用性:用于为多癌种早期检测试验设计筛选试验提供信息的微模拟模型。
J Med Screen. 2024 Sep;31(3):140-149. doi: 10.1177/09691413241228041. Epub 2024 Feb 2.
4
Dying To Find Out: The Cost of Time at the Dawn of the Multicancer Early Detection Era.《急于求成:多癌种早期检测时代黎明之际的时间成本》。
Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev. 2023 Aug 1;32(8):1003-1010. doi: 10.1158/1055-9965.EPI-22-1275.
5
Modelled mortality benefits of multi-cancer early detection screening in England.英格兰多癌种早期检测筛查的建模死亡率获益。
Br J Cancer. 2023 Jul;129(1):72-80. doi: 10.1038/s41416-023-02243-9. Epub 2023 Apr 25.
6
Cost-Effectiveness Analysis of Prostate Cancer Screening in the UK: A Decision Model Analysis Based on the CAP Trial.英国前列腺癌筛查的成本效益分析:基于 CAP 试验的决策模型分析。
Pharmacoeconomics. 2022 Dec;40(12):1207-1220. doi: 10.1007/s40273-022-01191-1. Epub 2022 Oct 6.
7
Evaluation of Prostate Cancer Screening Strategies in a Low-Resource, High-risk Population in the Bahamas.在巴哈马资源匮乏、高危人群中评估前列腺癌筛查策略。
JAMA Health Forum. 2022 May 20;3(5):e221116. doi: 10.1001/jamahealthforum.2022.1116. eCollection 2022 May.
8
Stage Shift as an Endpoint in Cancer Screening Trials: Implications for Evaluating Multicancer Early Detection Tests.作为癌症筛查试验终点的阶段转变:对评估多癌种早期检测试验的影响。
Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev. 2022 Jul 1;31(7):1298-1304. doi: 10.1158/1055-9965.EPI-22-0024.
9
Racial/Ethnic Differences in Cancer Diagnosed after Metastasis: Absolute Burden and Deaths Potentially Avoidable through Earlier Detection.转移性癌症诊断后的种族/民族差异:通过早期检测可避免的绝对负担和死亡人数。
Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev. 2022 Mar 1;31(3):521-527. doi: 10.1158/1055-9965.EPI-21-0823.
10
Cellular rewiring in lethal prostate cancer: the architect of drug resistance.致命性前列腺癌中的细胞重排:耐药性的建筑师。
Nat Rev Urol. 2020 May;17(5):292-307. doi: 10.1038/s41585-020-0298-8. Epub 2020 Mar 16.

本文引用的文献

1
Estimating key parameters in periodic breast cancer screening-application to the Canadian National Breast Screening Study data.估算周期性乳腺癌筛查中的关键参数-应用于加拿大国家乳腺癌筛查研究数据。
Cancer Epidemiol. 2010 Aug;34(4):429-33. doi: 10.1016/j.canep.2010.04.001.
2
Cancer screening in the United States, 2010: a review of current American Cancer Society guidelines and issues in cancer screening.美国 2010 年癌症筛查:对现行美国癌症协会指南的回顾以及癌症筛查中的问题。
CA Cancer J Clin. 2010 Mar-Apr;60(2):99-119. doi: 10.3322/caac.20063.
3
Effects of mammography screening under different screening schedules: model estimates of potential benefits and harms.不同筛查计划下的乳腺 X 线筛查效果:潜在获益和危害的模型评估。
Ann Intern Med. 2009 Nov 17;151(10):738-47. doi: 10.7326/0003-4819-151-10-200911170-00010.
4
Effect of rising chemotherapy costs on the cost savings of colorectal cancer screening.化疗费用上涨对结直肠癌筛查成本节约的影响。
J Natl Cancer Inst. 2009 Oct 21;101(20):1412-22. doi: 10.1093/jnci/djp319. Epub 2009 Sep 24.
5
Prostate cancer diagnosis and treatment after the introduction of prostate-specific antigen screening: 1986-2005.前列腺特异性抗原筛查引入后的前列腺癌诊断与治疗:1986 - 2005年
J Natl Cancer Inst. 2009 Oct 7;101(19):1325-9. doi: 10.1093/jnci/djp278. Epub 2009 Aug 31.
6
Screening and prostate-cancer mortality in a randomized European study.一项欧洲随机研究中的筛查与前列腺癌死亡率
N Engl J Med. 2009 Mar 26;360(13):1320-8. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa0810084. Epub 2009 Mar 18.
7
Lead time and overdiagnosis in prostate-specific antigen screening: importance of methods and context.前列腺特异性抗原筛查中的提前期和过度诊断:方法及背景的重要性
J Natl Cancer Inst. 2009 Mar 18;101(6):374-83. doi: 10.1093/jnci/djp001. Epub 2009 Mar 10.
8
At what costs will screening with CT colonography be competitive? A cost-effectiveness approach.CT结肠成像筛查在何种成本下具有竞争力?一种成本效益分析方法。
Int J Cancer. 2009 Mar 1;124(5):1161-8. doi: 10.1002/ijc.24025.
9
Cost-effectiveness of opportunistic versus organised mammography screening in Switzerland.瑞士机会性乳腺钼靶筛查与组织性乳腺钼靶筛查的成本效益
Eur J Cancer. 2009 Jan;45(1):127-38. doi: 10.1016/j.ejca.2008.09.015. Epub 2008 Nov 27.
10
Evaluating test strategies for colorectal cancer screening: a decision analysis for the U.S. Preventive Services Task Force.评估结直肠癌筛查的检测策略:美国预防服务工作组的决策分析
Ann Intern Med. 2008 Nov 4;149(9):659-69. doi: 10.7326/0003-4819-149-9-200811040-00244. Epub 2008 Oct 6.

早期筛查如何影响疾病进展?前列腺癌筛查中模型估计的获益。

How does early detection by screening affect disease progression? Modeling estimated benefits in prostate cancer screening.

机构信息

Department of Public Health, Erasmus MC Rotterdam, The Netherlands.

出版信息

Med Decis Making. 2011 Jul-Aug;31(4):550-8. doi: 10.1177/0272989X10396717. Epub 2011 Mar 15.

DOI:10.1177/0272989X10396717
PMID:21406620
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC4789305/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Simulation models are essential tools for estimating benefits of cancer screening programs. Such models include a screening-effect model that represents how early detection by screening followed by treatment affects disease-specific survival. Two commonly used screening-effect models are the stage-shift model, where mortality benefits are explained by the shift to more favorable stages, and the cure model, where early detection enhances the chances of cure from disease.

OBJECTIVE

This article describes commonly used screening-effect models and analyses their predicted mortality benefit in a model for prostate cancer screening.

METHOD

The MISCAN simulation model was used to predict the reduction of prostate cancer mortality in the European Randomized Study of Screening for Prostate Cancer (ERSPC) Rotterdam. The screening-effect models were included in the model. For each model the predictions of prostate cancer mortality reduction were calculated. The study compared 4 screening-effect models, which are versions of the stage-shift model or the cure model.

RESULTS

The stage-shift models predicted, after a follow-up of 9 years, reductions in prostate cancer mortality varying from 38% to 63% for ERSPC-Rotterdam compared with a 27% reduction observed in the ERSPC. The cure models predicted reductions in prostate cancer mortality varying from 21% to 27%.

CONCLUSIONS

The differences in predicted mortality reductions show the importance of validating models to observed trial mortality data. The stage-shift models considerably overestimated the mortality reduction. Therefore, the stage-shift models should be used with care, especially when modeling the effect of screening for cancers with long lead times, such as prostate cancer.

摘要

背景

模拟模型是估计癌症筛查计划效益的重要工具。此类模型包括一个筛查效果模型,该模型表示通过筛查和治疗早期发现如何影响特定疾病的生存。两种常用的筛查效果模型是阶段转移模型,其中死亡率的益处是通过向更有利的阶段转移来解释的,以及治愈模型,其中早期发现提高了治愈疾病的机会。

目的

本文描述了常用的筛查效果模型,并在前列腺癌筛查的模型中分析了它们对预测死亡率获益的影响。

方法

使用 MISCAN 模拟模型预测欧洲前列腺癌筛查随机研究(ERSPC)鹿特丹分部的前列腺癌死亡率降低。该模型包括了筛查效果模型。为每个模型计算了前列腺癌死亡率降低的预测值。本研究比较了 4 种筛查效果模型,它们是阶段转移模型或治愈模型的变体。

结果

经过 9 年的随访,阶段转移模型预测 ERSPC-Rotterdam 与 ERSPC 相比,前列腺癌死亡率降低幅度在 38%至 63%之间,而观察到的降低幅度为 27%。治愈模型预测前列腺癌死亡率降低幅度在 21%至 27%之间。

结论

预测死亡率降低的差异表明了验证模型与观察试验死亡率数据的重要性。阶段转移模型大大高估了死亡率的降低。因此,应谨慎使用阶段转移模型,特别是在模拟具有较长潜伏期的癌症(如前列腺癌)的筛查效果时。