Suppr超能文献

全球风险方法应更好地应用于法国高血压患者:模拟研究与观察研究的比较。

The global risk approach should be better applied in French hypertensive patients: a comparison between simulation and observation studies.

机构信息

Departamento de Pre-clínicas, Escuela de Medicina, Universidad de Valparaíso, Valparaíso, Chile.

出版信息

PLoS One. 2011 Mar 3;6(3):e17508. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0017508.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

The prediction of the public health impact of a preventive strategy provides valuable support for decision-making. International guidelines for hypertension management have introduced the level of absolute cardiovascular risk in the definition of the treatment target population. The public health impact of implementing such a recommendation has not been measured.

METHODOLOGY/PRINCIPAL FINDINGS: We assessed the efficiency of three treatment scenarios according to historical and current versions of practice guidelines on a Realistic Virtual Population representative of the French population aged from 35 to 64 years: 1) BP≥160/95 mm Hg; 2) BP≥140/90 mm Hg and 3) BP≥140/90 mm Hg plus increased CVD risk. We compared the eligibility following the ESC guidelines with the recently observed proportion of treated amongst hypertensive individuals reported by the Etude Nationale Nutrition Santé survey. Lowering the threshold to define hypertension multiplied by 2.5 the number of eligible individuals. Applying the cardiovascular risk rule reduced this number significantly: less than 1/4 of hypertensive women under 55 years and less than 1/3 of hypertensive men below 45 years of age. This was the most efficient strategy. Compared to the simulated guidelines application, men of all ages were undertreated (between 32 and 60%), as were women over 55 years (70%). By contrast, younger women were over-treated (over 200%).

CONCLUSION

The global CVD risk approach to decide for treatment is more efficient than the simple blood pressure level. However, lack of screening rather than guideline application seems to explain the low prescription rates among hypertensive individuals in France. Multidimensional analyses required to obtain these results are possible only through databases at the individual level: realistic virtual populations should become the gold standard for assessing the impact of public health policies at the national level.

摘要

背景

预防性策略的公共卫生影响预测为决策提供了有价值的支持。国际高血压管理指南在治疗目标人群的定义中引入了绝对心血管风险水平。尚未衡量实施此类建议对公共卫生的影响。

方法/主要发现:我们根据历史和当前版本的实践指南,在代表法国 35 至 64 岁人群的真实虚拟人群中评估了三种治疗方案的效率:1)BP≥160/95mmHg;2)BP≥140/90mmHg;3)BP≥140/90mmHg 且心血管风险增加。我们将 ESC 指南下的资格与最近通过 Etude Nationale Nutrition Santé 调查报告的高血压患者治疗比例进行了比较。将高血压的定义门槛降低到 140/90mmHg 会使符合条件的人数增加两倍。应用心血管风险规则会显著减少这个数字:55 岁以下的女性高血压患者中不到 1/4,45 岁以下的男性高血压患者中不到 1/3。这是最有效的策略。与模拟指南应用相比,所有年龄段的男性都存在治疗不足(32%至 60%),55 岁以上的女性也存在治疗不足(70%)。相比之下,年轻女性治疗过度(超过 200%)。

结论

决定治疗的全球 CVD 风险方法比单纯的血压水平更有效。然而,在法国,高血压患者处方率低似乎是由于缺乏筛查而不是指南的应用。获得这些结果所需的多维分析只能通过个人层面的数据库进行:真实虚拟人群应该成为评估国家层面公共卫生政策影响的黄金标准。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/3ac5/3048301/8fd03fa73f7a/pone.0017508.g001.jpg

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验