Department of Health and Exercise Science, The University of Oklahoma, Norman, Oklahoma, USA.
Scand J Med Sci Sports. 2011 Aug;21(4):510-8. doi: 10.1111/j.1600-0838.2010.01290.x. Epub 2011 Mar 16.
The focal point of previous literature was establishing the efficacy of blood flow restriction training with respect to muscular strength, muscular hypertrophy, and muscular endurance. After mounting evidence supporting the efficacy of low-intensity blood flow restriction training, research has shifted to the overall safety of this training modality. The aim of this review was to summarize the research on the overall safety of blood flow restriction training, focusing on the cardiovascular system (central and peripheral), muscle damage, oxidative stress, and nerve conduction velocity responses compared with those observed with regular exercise. Although still sparse, the blood flow restriction training research thus far is promising with respect to safety outcomes. Individuals respond similarly to blood flow restriction training and to regular exercise; however, longer term studies are required to better understand the chronic effects of low-intensity blood flow restriction training and possible safety issues.
以往文献的重点是确定血流限制训练在肌肉力量、肌肉肥大和肌肉耐力方面的功效。在越来越多的证据支持低强度血流限制训练的功效后,研究转向了这种训练方式的整体安全性。本综述的目的是总结血流限制训练的整体安全性研究,重点关注与常规运动相比,血流限制训练对心血管系统(中枢和外周)、肌肉损伤、氧化应激和神经传导速度的影响。尽管目前的血流限制训练研究还很稀少,但就安全性结果而言,该研究很有前景。个体对血流限制训练和常规运动的反应相似;然而,需要进行更长时间的研究,以更好地了解低强度血流限制训练的慢性影响和可能存在的安全问题。