Scientific Institute for Quality of Healthcare, Radboud University Nijmegen Medical Centre, The Netherlands.
Int J Nurs Stud. 2011 Sep;48(9):1040-8. doi: 10.1016/j.ijnurstu.2011.02.017. Epub 2011 Mar 17.
Patient care guidelines are usually implemented one at a time, yet patients are at risk for multiple, often preventable, adverse events simultaneously.
This study aimed to test the effect of the SAFE or SORRY? programme on the incidence of three adverse events (pressure ulcers, urinary tract infections and falls). This paper describes Part I of the study: the effect on the incidence of adverse events.
A cluster randomised trial was conducted between September 2006 and November 2008. After a three-month baseline period the intervention was implemented followed by a nine-month follow-up period.
Ten wards from four hospitals and ten wards from six nursing homes were stratified for institute and ward type and then randomised to intervention or usual care group.
During baseline and follow-up, patients (≥18 years) with an expected length of stay of at least five days, were asked to participate.
The SAFE or SORRY? programme consisted of the essential recommendations of guidelines for the three adverse events. A multifaceted implementation strategy was used for the implementation: education, patient involvement and feedback on process and outcome indicators. The usual care group continued care as usual. Data were collected on the incidence of adverse events and a Poisson regression model was used to estimate the rate ratio of the adverse events between the intervention and the usual care group at follow-up.
At follow-up, 2201 hospital patients with 3358 patient weeks and 392 nursing home patients with 5799 patient weeks were observed. Poisson regression analyses showed a rate ratio for the development of an adverse event in favour of the intervention group of 0.57 (95% CI: 0.34-0.95) and 0.67 (95% CI: 0.48-0.99) for hospital patients and nursing home patients respectively.
This study showed that implementing multiple guidelines simultaneously is possible, which is promising. Patients in the intervention groups developed 43% and 33% fewer adverse events compared to the usual care groups in hospitals and nursing homes respectively. Even so, more research is necessary to underline these results.
clinicaltrials.gov, number NCT00365430.
患者护理指南通常是一次实施一个,但患者同时面临多种经常可预防的不良事件的风险。
本研究旨在测试 SAFE 或 SORRY?方案对三种不良事件(压疮、尿路感染和跌倒)发生率的影响。本文介绍了研究的第一部分:对不良事件发生率的影响。
这是一项于 2006 年 9 月至 2008 年 11 月期间进行的群组随机试验。在进行了三个月的基线期后,实施了干预措施,随后进行了九个月的随访期。
四家医院的十个病房和六家养老院的十个病房按机构和病房类型分层,然后随机分配到干预组或常规护理组。
在基线期和随访期,均邀请预计住院时间至少五天的患者(年龄≥18 岁)参与研究。
SAFE 或 SORRY?方案包含了针对三种不良事件的指南的基本建议。实施了多方面的实施策略:教育、患者参与以及对过程和结果指标的反馈。常规护理组继续常规护理。收集不良事件的发生率数据,并使用泊松回归模型估计干预组和常规护理组在随访时不良事件的发生率比。
在随访期,观察到 2201 名医院患者(3358 个患者周)和 392 名养老院患者(5799 个患者周)。泊松回归分析显示,干预组发生不良事件的发生率比为 0.57(95%置信区间:0.34-0.95),医院患者和养老院患者分别为 0.67(95%置信区间:0.48-0.99)。
本研究表明,同时实施多项指南是可行的,这是有希望的。与常规护理组相比,干预组的医院患者和养老院患者发生的不良事件分别减少了 43%和 33%。即便如此,仍需要进一步研究来证实这些结果。
clinicaltrials.gov,编号 NCT00365430。