van Gaal Betsie G I, Schoonhoven Lisette, Hulscher Marlies E J L, Mintjes Joke A J, Borm George F, Koopmans Raymond T C M, van Achterberg Theo
Radboud University Nijmegen Medical Centre, the Netherlands.
BMC Health Serv Res. 2009 Apr 1;9:58. doi: 10.1186/1472-6963-9-58.
Patients in hospitals and nursing homes are at risk of the development of, often preventable, adverse events (AEs), which threaten patient safety. Guidelines for prevention of many types of AEs are available, however, compliance with these guidelines appears to be lacking. Besides general barriers that inhibit implementation, this non-compliance is associated with the large number of guidelines competing for attention. As implementation of a guideline is time-consuming, it is difficult for organisations to implement all available guidelines. Another problem is lack of feedback about performance using quality indicators of guideline based care and lack of a recognisable, unambiguous system for implementation. A program that allows organisations to implement multiple guidelines simultaneously may facilitate guideline use and thus improve patient safety.The aim of this study is to develop and test such an integral patient safety program that addresses several AEs simultaneously in hospitals and nursing homes. This paper reports the design of this study.
The patient safety program addresses three AEs: pressure ulcers, falls and urinary tract infections. It consists of bundles and outcome and process indicators based on the existing evidence based guidelines. In addition it includes a multifaceted tailored implementation strategy: education, patient involvement, and a computerized registration and feedback system. The patient safety program was tested in a cluster randomised trial on ten hospital wards and ten nursing home wards. The baseline period was three months followed by the implementation of the patient safety program for fourteen months. Subsequently the follow-up period was nine months. Primary outcome measure was the incidence of AEs on every ward. Secondary outcome measures were the utilization of preventive interventions and the knowledge of nurses regarding the three topics. Randomisation took place on ward level. The results will be analysed separately for hospitals and nursing homes.
Major challenges were the development of the patient safety program including a digital registration and feedback system and the implementation of the patient safety program.
Trial registration: ClinicalTrials.gov ID [NCT00365430].
医院和疗养院的患者面临发生不良事件(AE)的风险,其中许多不良事件往往是可以预防的,这对患者安全构成威胁。虽然有预防多种不良事件的指南,但似乎缺乏对这些指南的遵守情况。除了抑制实施的一般障碍外,这种不遵守还与大量相互竞争关注的指南有关。由于指南的实施耗时,组织很难实施所有可用的指南。另一个问题是缺乏基于指南护理的质量指标的绩效反馈,以及缺乏可识别、明确的实施系统。一个允许组织同时实施多个指南的项目可能会促进指南的使用,从而提高患者安全。本研究的目的是开发并测试这样一个综合患者安全项目,该项目能同时解决医院和疗养院中的多种不良事件。本文报告了该研究的设计。
患者安全项目解决三种不良事件:压疮、跌倒和尿路感染。它由基于现有循证指南的集束以及结果和过程指标组成。此外,它还包括多方面的定制实施策略:教育、患者参与以及计算机化的登记和反馈系统。患者安全项目在十个医院病房和十个疗养院病房的整群随机试验中进行了测试。基线期为三个月,随后实施患者安全项目为期十四个月。随后的随访期为九个月。主要结局指标是每个病房的不良事件发生率。次要结局指标是预防性干预措施的使用情况以及护士对这三个主题的知识掌握情况。随机化在病房层面进行。结果将分别针对医院和疗养院进行分析。
主要挑战在于患者安全项目的开发,包括数字登记和反馈系统,以及患者安全项目的实施。
试验注册:ClinicalTrials.gov 标识符 [NCT00365430]