Suppr超能文献

SAFE 或 SORRY? 方案对医院和养老院护士患者安全知识的影响:一项整群随机试验。

The effect of the SAFE or SORRY? programme on patient safety knowledge of nurses in hospitals and nursing homes: a cluster randomised trial.

机构信息

Scientific Institute for Quality of Healthcare, Radboud University Nijmegen Medical Centre, Nijmegen, The Netherlands.

出版信息

Int J Nurs Stud. 2010 Sep;47(9):1117-25. doi: 10.1016/j.ijnurstu.2010.02.001. Epub 2010 Mar 3.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Patients in hospitals and nursing homes are at risk for the development of often preventable adverse events. Guidelines for the prevention of many types of adverse events are available, however compliance with these guidelines appears to be lacking. As a result many patients do not receive appropriate care. We developed a patient safety program that allows organisations to implement multiple guidelines simultaneously and therefore facilitates guideline use to improve patient safety. This program was developed for three frequently occurring nursing care related adverse events: pressure ulcers, urinary tract infections and falls. For the implementation of this program we developed educational activities for nurses as a main implementation strategy.

OBJECTIVES

The aim of this study is to describe the effect of interactive and tailored education on the knowledge levels of nurses.

DESIGN

A cluster randomised trial was conducted between September 2006 and July 2008.

SETTINGS

Ten hospital wards and ten nursing home wards participated in this study. Prior to baseline, randomisation of the wards to an intervention or control group was stratified for centre and type of ward.

PARTICIPANTS

All nurses from participating wards.

METHODS

A knowledge test measured nurses' knowledge on the prevention of pressure ulcers, urinary tract infections and falls, during baseline en follow-up. The results were analysed for hospitals and nursing homes separately.

RESULTS

After correction for baseline, the mean difference between the intervention and the control group on hospital nurses' knowledge on the prevention of the three adverse events was 0.19 points on a zero to ten scale (95% CI: -0.03 to 0.42), in favour of the intervention group. There was a statistically significant effect on knowledge of pressure ulcers, with an improved mean mark of 0.45 points (95% CI: 0.10-0.81). For the other two topics there was no statistically significant effect. Nursing home nurses' knowledge did neither improve (0 points, CI: -0.35 to 0.35) overall, nor for the separate subjects.

CONCLUSION

The educational intervention improved hospital nurses' knowledge on the prevention of pressure ulcers only. More research on long term improvement of knowledge is needed.

摘要

背景

医院和养老院的患者面临着经常可预防的不良事件的风险。有许多预防各种不良事件的指南,但似乎缺乏对这些指南的遵守。结果,许多患者没有得到适当的护理。我们开发了一个患者安全计划,使组织能够同时实施多种指南,从而促进指南的使用,以提高患者安全性。该计划是为三种经常发生的护理相关不良事件开发的:压疮、尿路感染和跌倒。为了实施该计划,我们为护士开发了教育活动作为主要实施策略。

目的

本研究的目的是描述互动和量身定制的教育对护士知识水平的影响。

设计

这是一项在 2006 年 9 月至 2008 年 7 月之间进行的群组随机试验。

设置

10 个医院病房和 10 个养老院病房参与了这项研究。在基线之前,根据中心和病房类型对病房进行了干预组和对照组的随机分组。

参与者

所有参与病房的护士。

方法

在基线和随访期间,通过知识测试测量护士预防压疮、尿路感染和跌倒的知识。分别对医院和养老院进行分析。

结果

校正基线后,干预组与对照组医院护士在预防这三种不良事件方面的知识差异平均为 0.19 分(0 至 10 分),有利于干预组。在压疮预防方面,知识的平均得分有显著提高,提高了 0.45 分(95%置信区间:0.10-0.81)。对于其他两个主题,没有统计学上的显著效果。总体而言,养老院护士的知识没有改善(0 分,95%置信区间:-0.35 至 0.35),也没有改善对单独主题的知识。

结论

教育干预仅提高了医院护士在压疮预防方面的知识。需要进一步研究以了解知识的长期改善情况。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验