Servicio de Enfermedades Infecciosas, Hospital Universitario de Bellvitge, IDIBELL, Departamento de Ciencias Clínicas, Universidad de Barcelona, Red Española de Investigación en Patología Infecciosa, Instituto de Salud Carlos III, Barcelona, Spain.
Enferm Infecc Microbiol Clin. 2011 Mar;29 Suppl 1:26-33. doi: 10.1016/S0213-005X(11)70015-5.
Interferon-γ-based assays, collectively known as IFN-γ release assays (IGRAs), have emerged as a reliable alternative to the old tuberculin skin test (TST) for the immunodiagnosis of tuberculosis (TB) infection. The 2 commercially available tests, the enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA), QuantiFERON-TB Gold Intube (QFT-IT), and the enzyme-linked immunospot assay (ELISPOT), T-SPOT.TB, are more accurate than TST for the diagnosis of TB, since they are highly specific and correlate better with the existence of risk factors for the infection. According to the available data, T-SPOT.TB obtains a higher number of positive results than QFT-IT, while its specificity seems to be lower. Although the sensitivity of the IFN-γ -based assays may be impaired to some extent by cellular immunosuppression and extreme ages of life, they perform better than TST in these situations. Data from longitudinal studies suggest that IFN-γ-based tests are better predictors of subsequent development of active TB than TST; however this prognostic value has not been consistently demonstrated. This review focuses on the clinical use of the IFN-γ -based tests in different risk TB groups, and notes the main limitations and areas for future development.
干扰素-γ 检测法,统称干扰素-γ 释放试验(IGRAs),已经成为一种可靠的选择,取代旧的结核菌素皮肤试验(TST),用于结核病(TB)感染的免疫诊断。两种商业化的检测方法,酶联免疫吸附试验(ELISA),QuantiFERON-TB Gold In-Tube(QFT-IT)和酶联免疫斑点试验(ELISPOT),T-SPOT.TB,比 TST 更准确地诊断 TB,因为它们具有高度的特异性,并且与感染的危险因素存在更好地相关。根据现有数据,T-SPOT.TB 比 QFT-IT 获得更多的阳性结果,而其特异性似乎较低。虽然细胞免疫抑制和生命的极端年龄在某种程度上可能会影响基于干扰素-γ 的检测法的敏感性,但在这些情况下,它们比 TST 表现更好。来自纵向研究的数据表明,基于干扰素-γ 的检测法比 TST 更好地预测随后发生的活动性 TB;然而,这种预测价值尚未得到一致证明。这篇综述侧重于在不同 TB 风险组中使用基于干扰素-γ 的检测法,并指出了主要的局限性和未来的发展领域。